According to recent news reports, developments in biotechnology promise to transform our bodies and our lives. Stem cell research and cloning research are reported to offer us the prospect of being able to grow `spare' body parts and to replace diseased or damaged tissue, implying that there are no natural limits to life, and that the body-machine may be endlessly repaired, and even replicated. The birth of a cloned sheep, Dolly, announced in February 1997, is seen as a milestone development in this regard, suggesting that it is possible to defy `nature' by `turning back the biological clock'. While the development was heralded by many as pointing to new medical therapies, it also served to fuel widespread fears that the technology would soon be applied to cloning humans. This article explores how the news media `framed' issues on human cloning in the aftermath of the announcement of Dolly and thus may have heightened public concerns about its implications, particularly for `individuality' or `identity'. It draws on articles appearing in Australian newspapers, beginning with the initial stories on Dolly through to May 1999, when it was reported that Dolly had shown signs of premature ageing. The article highlights the role of the media in shaping public debate on biotechnology, particularly with regard to its impacts on the body, self and society.
Borger, J.
(2001) `Maverick Scientists Promise a Human Clone', The Guardian8 August: 1.
6.
Brock, D.W.
(1998) `Cloning Human Beings: An Assessment of the Ethical Issues Pro and Con', pp. 141-164 in M.C. Nussbaum and C.R. Sunstein (eds) Clones and Clones: Facts and Fantasies about Human Cloning. New York and London: W.W. Norton and Co.
7.
Brook, S.
(1999) `Dolly: She's Just Mutton Dressed Up as Lamb', The Australian28 May: 1.
8.
Bud, R.
(1995) `In the Engine of Industry: Regulators of Biotechnology, 1970-86', in M. Bauer (ed.) Resistance to New Technology: Nuclear Power, Information Technology and Biotechnology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Butler, D.
and M. Wadman (1997) `Calls for Cloning Ban Sell Science Short', Nature386(6620): 8-9.
10.
Connor, S.
(1997) `Pioneer Questions Viability of Cloning', The Australian28 July: 3.
11.
Conrad, P.
(1997) `Public Eyes and Private Genes: Historical Frames, News Constructions, and Social Problems', Social Problems44(2): 139-154.
12.
Conrad, P.
(1999) `Use of Expertise: Sources, Quotes, and Voice in the Reporting of Genetics in the News', Public Understanding of Science8: 258-302.
13.
Conrad, P.
(2001) `Genetic Optimism: Framing Genes and Mental Illness in the News', Culture, Medicine and Pyschiatry25: 225-247.
14.
Dayton, L.
(1998) `Alive and Cloning', The Sydney Morning Herald21 January: 9.
15.
Fairclough, N.
(1995a) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. New York: E. Arnold.
16.
Fairclough, N.
(1995b) Media Discourse. New York: E. Arnold.
17.
Farrar, S.
(1998) `Doctor Expects to Deliver Duplicates in Due Course', The Australian30 October: 13.
18.
Franklin, S.
(2001) `Culturing Biology: Cell Lines for the Second Millennium', Health5(3): 335-354.
19.
Gould, S.J.
(1998) `Dolly's Fashion and Louis's Passion', pp. 41-53 in M.C. Nussbaum and C.R. Sunstein (eds) Clones and Clones: Facts and Fantasies about Human Cloning. New York and London: W.W. Norton and Co.
20.
Hansen, A.
(1994) `Journalistic Practices and Science Reporting in the British Press', Public Understanding of Science3(2): 111-134.
21.
Hansen, A.
(2000) `Claims-Making and Framing in British Newspaper Coverage of the “Brent Spar” Controversy', pp. 55-72 in S. Allan, B. Adam and C. Carter (eds) Environmental Risks and the Media. London and New York: London.
22.
Hawkes, N.
and T. Rhodes (1997) `Human Clones within 2 Years', The Weekend Australian8 March: 15.
23.
Hayes, R.
(2000) `In the Pipeline: Genetically Modified Humans?', Multinational MonitorJanuary: 29-34.
24.
Hedgecoe, A.M.(1999) `Transforming Genes: Metaphors of Information and Language in Modern Genetics', Science as Culture8(2): 209-229.
25.
Hickman, B.
(1998) `Clone Plan Threatens to Create Human Monsters: Scientists', The Australian9 January: 5.
26.
Hornig, S.
(1992) `Framing Risk: Audience and Reader Factors', Journalism Quarterly69(3): 679-690.
27.
Hornig, S.
(1993) `Reading Risk: Public Response to Print Media Accounts of Technological Risk', Public Understanding of Science2: 95-109.
28.
Hoy, A.
(1997) `Experts Rush to Embrace Cloning Process', The Sydney Morning Herald25 February: 8.
29.
Human Genetics Advisory Commission
(1998) Cloning Issues in Reproduction, Science and Medicine, January (www.dti.gov.uk/hgac).
30.
Humber, J.M.
and R.F. Almeder (eds) (1998) Human Cloning. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
31.
Jones, S.-A.
(1998) `Cloning', The West Australian (The Big Weekend Section) 31 January: 3.
32.
Kass, L.
(1997) `The Case Against Human Cloning', The Weekend Australian14 June: 20.
33.
Kerin, J.
and C. Collins (1998) `Double Take', The Weekend Australian24 January: 26.
34.
Kitzinger, J.
and J. Reilly (1997) `The Rise and Fall of Risk Reporting: Media Coverage of Human Genetics Research, “False Memory Syndrome” and “Mad Cow Disease”', European Journal of Communication12(3): 319-350.
35.
Kluger, J.
(1997) `Will We Follow the Sheep?', Time10 March: 10, 66-70.
36.
Klugman, C.M.
and T.H. Murray (1998) `Cloning, Historical Ethics, and NBAC', pp. 3-50 in J.M. Humber and R.F. Almeder (eds) Human Cloning. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
37.
Kolata, G.
(1997) Clone: The Road to Dolly and the Path Ahead. London: Allen Lane.
38.
Laqueur, T.
(1990) Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
McGee, G.
(ed.) (1998) The Human Cloning Debate. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Hills Books.
40.
Miller, M.M.
and B.P. Riechert (2000) `Interest Group Strategies and Journalistic Norms', in S. Allen, B. Adam and C. Carter (eds) Environmental Risks and the Media. London and New York: Routledge.
41.
Morris, S.
(2001) `Loophole Allows Human Cloning', The Guardian16 November: 15.
42.
Nash, J.M.
(1997) `The Age of Cloning: A Line Has Been Crossed, and Reproductive Biology Will Never Be the Same for People or for Sheep', Time10 March: 10, 62-115.
43.
Nelkin, D.
(1994) `Promotional Metaphors and their Popular Appeal', Public Understanding of Science3(1): 25-31.
44.
Nelkin, D.
and L. Andrews (1999) `DNA Identification and Surveillance Creep', in P. Conrad and J. Gabe (eds) Sociological Perspectives on the New Genetics. Oxford: Blackwell.
45.
Nussbaum, M.C.
and C.R. Sunstein (eds) (1998) Clones and Clones. New York and London: W.W. Norton and Co.
46.
Petersen, A.
(2001) `Biofantasies: Genetics and Medicine in the Print News Media', Social Science and Medicine52: 1255-1268.
47.
Potter, J.
and M. Weatherall (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.
48.
Priest, S.H.
(1994) `Structuring Public Debate on Biotechnology', Science Communication16(2): 166-179.
49.
Radford, T.
(2001) `Deaf to the Warning: Science and Society Are Not Ready', The Guardian8 August: 3.
50.
Ragg, M.
(1998) `Double Your Money', The Australian8 June: 10.
51.
Shickle, D.
(1999) `Cloning, God, Hitler and Mad Scientists: Arguments Used by the Public in the Cloning Debate on the Internet', in T.A. Caulfield and B. Williams-Jones (eds) The Commercialization of Genetic Research: Ethical, Legal, and Policy Issues. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
52.
Silver, L.M.
(1998) Remaking Eden: Cloning, Genetic Engineering and the Future of Human Kind?London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
53.
Smith, D.
(1997) `Send in the Clones', The Sydney Morning Herald1 March: 36.
54.
Smith, D.
(1999) `Mutton Dressed Up as Lamb', The Sydney Morning Herald28 May: 1.
55.
Turney, J.
(1998) Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
56.
Van Dijk, J.
(1998) Imagenation: Popular Images of Genetics. New York: New York University Press.
57.
Wall, W.
(1999) Sexing the Parrot: Changing the World with DNA. London: Cassell.
58.
Weiss, R.
and J. Delvecchio (1998) `Scientist “90% Ready” to Clone First Human', The Sydney Morning Herald8 January: 3.
59.
Wellcome Trust
(1998) Public Perspectives on Human Cloning, Medicine in Society Programme (www.wellcome.ac.uk).
60.
Wilmut, I.
, K. Campbell and C. Tudge (2000) The Second Creation: The Age of Biological Control by the Scientists who Cloned Dolly. London: Headline.
