This study investigates international tourists’ personality-based psychographic traits and their destination preferences in Indonesia. Given the increasing importance of understanding diverse tourist behaviours to support sustainable destination development, particularly in emerging markets, this research addresses a critical gap in the application of psychographic segmentation in a developing-country context. Guided by Plog's psychographic model, it explores how allocentric, midcentric and psychocentric personality types influence destination choice, focusing on Indonesia's emerging super-priority tourist destinations. An online survey of 304 international tourists, predominantly from Europe, was analysed using descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations and multinomial logistic regression controlling for demographic and travel behaviour variables. The findings show that allocentric tourists are the majority (69.74%) and prefer emerging destinations such as Likupang, Lake Toba and Labuan Bajo, which offer novel, culturally rich experiences. Midcentric tourists (25%) tend to prefer Bali, a mature destination, but remain open to new sites. Psychocentric tourists (5.26%) largely choose Bali. These findings highlight the significant influence of psychographic traits on destination preferences and underscore the moderating roles of destination maturity, infrastructure and branding in shaping tourist behaviour. The model explains about 28% of variance in destination choice, reflecting meaningful explanatory power given the complexity of travel decisions. The study advances theory by integrating destination attributes with psychographic segmentation and challenges the static view of psychographic types by acknowledging behavioural dynamism influenced by cultural and technological changes. It contributes valuable insights to tourism scholarship, validating Plog's model in a developing economy and informing sustainable tourism development and destination planning.
AgarwalSSinghP (2022) Understanding psychographics in tourism: A tool for segmenting tourists. In: SharmaAHassanA (eds) Future of Tourism in Asia. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1669-3_12
2.
AgrestiA (2013) Categorical Data Analysis. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
3.
AlbayrakTCaberM (2018) Examining the relationship between tourist motivation and satisfaction by two competing methods. Tourism Management69: 201–213.
4.
AlbertoAHallCM (2021) Shock of the new: The rhetoric of global urban tourism in the rebuild of Christchurch, New Zealand. In: The Power of New Urban Tourism. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 175–188.
5.
AlegreJCladeraMSardM (2011) Analysing the influence of tourist motivations on tourist expenditure at a sun-and-sand destination. Tourism Economics17(4): 813–832.
6.
AndreuRClaverEQuerD (2014) Destination attributes and Chinese outbound tourism to Europe. Journal of China Tourism Research10(3): 275–291.
7.
BayarsaikhanTKimSTGimTHT (2020) International tourists’ destination choice differences according to Plog’s personality types: analyzing the case of Mongolia based on the recreation opportunity spectrum. International Journal of Urban Sciences24(4): 485–515.
8.
ButlerR (2004) The tourism area life cycle in the twenty-first century. In: LewAAHallCMWilliamsAM (eds) A Companion to Tourism. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 159–170.
9.
ChavanPVhatkarAShoukatMH, et al. (2025) Tourist tales uncovered: navigating satisfaction through psychographics and destination impressions–a systematic literature review. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research30(1): 127–145.
10.
CreswellJW (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
11.
Cruz-MilánO (2018) Plog’s model of personality-based psychographic traits in tourism: A review of empirical research. In: CamilleriA (ed) Tourism Planning and Destination Marketing. England: Emerald, 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787562912.
12.
Cruz-MilánO (2022) One model, one construct, different psychographic measures: a comparison of three scales of allocentrism-psychocentrism. Tourism and Hospitality Research23(4): 471–493.
13.
DolnicarS (2020) Market segmentation analysis in tourism: a perspective paper. Tourism Review75(1): 45–48.
14.
DolnicarSGrünBLeischF (2018) Market Segmentation Analysis: Understanding It, Doing It, and Making It Useful. New York: Springer.
15.
DryglasDSalamagaM (2018) Segmentation by push motives in health tourism destinations: a case study of Polish spa resorts. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management9: 234–246.
16.
FieldA (2013) Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. Los Angeles: Sage.
17.
FrancisLJMansfieldSMcKennaU (2021) Psychographic segmentation of cathedral visitors in England and Wales: introducing the visitor expectations type scales 2.0 (VETS 2.0). Mental Health, Religion & Culture24(6): 535–553.
18.
González-RodríguezMRDomínguez-QuinteroAMPaddisonB (2019) The direct and indirect influence of experience quality on satisfaction: the importance of emotions. Current Issues in Tourism23(22): 2779–2797.
19.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJ, et al. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Pearson.
20.
HandlerITanCSL (2022) Impact of Japanese travelers’ psychographics on domestic travel intention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Vacation Marketing30(1): 166–185.
21.
HashimotoT (2024) Allocentric and psychocentric. In: JafariJXiaoH (eds) Encyclopedia of Tourism. Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland, 31–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74923-1_5.
22.
HosmerDWJrLemeshowSSturdivantRX (2013) Applied Logistic Regression. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
23.
IsaSMChinPNMohammadNU (2018) Muslim tourist perceived value: a study on Malaysia halal tourism. Journal of Islamic Marketing9(2): 402–420.
24.
LeeGO’LearyJTLeeSH, et al. (2002) Comparison and contrast of push and pull motivational effects on trip behavior: an application of a multinomial logistic regression model. Tourism Analysis7(2): 89–104.
25.
LegohérelPWongKK (2006) Market segmentation in the tourism industry and consumers’ spending: what about direct expenditures?Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing20(2): 15–30.
26.
LiMCaiLALehtoXY, et al. (2010) A missing link in understanding revisit intention: the role of motivation and image. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing27(4): 335–348.
27.
LitvinSWGuttentagD (2023) There is no place like home for the holidays: who travels in the midst of a deadly pandemic?Journal of Travel Research62(5): 1077–1089.
28.
LitvinSWGuttentagDSmithWW (2021) Who should you market to in a crisis? Examining Plog’s model during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Travel Research61(5): 981–989.
29.
LitvinSWSmithWW (2015) A new perspective on the Plog psychographic system. Journal of Vacation Marketing22(2): 89–97.
30.
MannellRCIso-AholaSE (1987) Psychological nature of leisure and tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research14(3): 314–331.
31.
McKercherB (2006) Are psychographics predictors of destination life cycles?Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing19(1): 49–55.
32.
MerrittRKlineCCrawfordA, et al. (2016) An exploration of recreational activities while travelling relative to psychographic tendencies. Tourism Recreation Research41(3): 302–313.
33.
Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy (2023). Statistik Kunjungan Wisatawan Mancanegara Bulan Januari 2022.
34.
MoisaDGParapanosDHeapT (2025) The role of digital footprints for destination competitiveness and engagement: utilizing mobile technology for tourist segmentation integrating personality traits. International Journal of Tourism Research27(1): e70006.
35.
MondoTSLuzABTde OliveiraRDS, et al. (2025) Mapping perceived service quality in tourism resorts through user-generated content. Strategic Business Research100024.
NickersonNPEllisGD (1991) Traveler types and activation theory: a comparison of two models. Journal of Travel Research29(3): 26–31.
38.
OtooFEKimSAgrusaJ, et al. (2021) Classification of senior tourists according to personality traits. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research26(5): 539–556.
39.
Pandža-BajsI (2015) Tourist perceived value, relationship to satisfaction, and behavioral intentions: the example of the Croatian tourist destination Dubrovnik. Journal of Travel Research54(1): 122–134.
40.
ParkJYJangS (2014) Psychographics: static or dynamic?International Journal of Tourism Research16(4): 351–354.
41.
PintoHOdoiENogueiraC, et al. (2025) Pathways to progress: unveiling structural change in Africa through economic transformation, technology, talent, and tourism. Economies13(1): 21.
42.
PlogS (2001) Why destination areas rise and fall in popularity: an update of a Cornell Quarterly classic. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly42(3): 13–24.
43.
PlogSC (1974) Why destination areas rise and fall in popularity. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly14(4): 55–58.
44.
PlogSC (1990) A carpenter’s tools: an answer to Stephen L. J. Smith’s review of psychocentrism/allocentrism. Journal of Travel Research28(4): 43–45.
45.
PlogSC (1991) A carpenter’s tools re-visited: measuring allocentrism and psychocentrism properly…the first time. Journal of Travel Research29(4): 51.
46.
PlogSC (2002) The power of psychographics and the concept of venturesomeness. Journal of Travel Research40(3): 244–251.
47.
PlogSC (2008) The psychology of travel: Motivations and segment characteristics. In: BiedermanPSLaiJLaitamakiJM, et al. (eds) Travel and Tourism: An Industry Primer. New Jersey: Pearson, 64–95.
RamYHallCM (2026) Fifty years for Plog’s psychographic theory: lessons of replication and validity for tourist behaviour research. Current Issues in Tourism29(8): 1576–1591.
50.
RasoolimaneshSMSeyfiSRatherRA, et al. (2022) Investigating the mediating role of visitor satisfaction in the relationship between memorable tourism experiences and behavioral intentions in heritage tourism context. Tourism Review77(2): 687–709.
51.
RoHOlsonEDChoiY (2017) An exploratory study of gay travelers: socio-demographic analysis. Tourism Review72(1): 15–27.
52.
SetiawanHMarwaTWahabZ, et al. (2021) The strength of tourist involvement in mediating the relationship between experience value, destination image and tourist loyalty: an empirical study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business8(6): 1079–1090.
53.
SmithSLJ (1990a) A test of Plog’s allocentric/psychocentric model: evidence from seven nations. Journal of Travel Research28(4): 40–43.
54.
SmithSLJ (1990b) Another look at the carpenter's tools: a reply to plog. Journal of Travel Research29(2): 50–51.
55.
SrihadiTFSukandarDSoehadiAW (2016) Segmentation of the tourism market for Jakarta: classification of foreign visitors’ lifestyle typologies. Tourism Management Perspectives19: 32–39.
56.
StylidisDSitJBiranA (2018) Residents’ place image: a meaningful psychographic variable for tourism segmentation?Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing35(6): 715–725.
57.
SuhartantoDBrienAPrimianaI, et al. (2019) Tourist loyalty in creative tourism: the role of experience quality, value, satisfaction, and motivation. Current Issues in Tourism23(7): 867–879.
YooCKYoonDParkE (2018) Tourist motivation: an integral approach to destination choices. Tourism Review73(2): 169–185.
60.
ZhangHWuYBuhalisD (2018) A model of perceived image, memorable tourism experiences and revisit intention. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management8: 326–336.
61.
ZinsA (2008) Market segmentation in tourism: A critical review of 20 years’ research efforts. In: KronenbergCMüllerSPetersMPikkemaatBWeiemairK (eds) Change Management in Tourism: From the old to the new Tourism. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, 289–301.
