This research evaluates Plog’s model of allocentricity and psychocentricity in order to test its effectiveness as a predictor of travel behavior. While some of Plog’s psychographic system’s behavioral characteristics were confirmed, the major finding related to the actual visitation patterns of the tested sample’s travel, with the vast majority of the sample’s travel, regardless of the traveler’s Plog classification, to destinations classified as psychocentric. Practical marketing and destination management implications are discussed.
BurnsPHoldenA (1995) Tourism: A New Perspective. London: Prentice Hall.
2.
ChandlerJA (2004) Comparing visitor profiles at heritage tourism destinations in eastern North Carolina. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing16(1): 53–63.
3.
ChandlerJACostelloCA (2002) A profile of visitors at heritage tourism destinations in East Tennessee according to Plog’s lifestyle and activity level preference model. Journal of Travel Research41(2): 161–166.
4.
ChonKSSparroweRT (2000) Welcome to Hospitality, 2nd ed. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing.
5.
CohenE (1972) Toward a sociology of international tourism. Social Research39 (1): 164–182.
CrossleyJCJamiesonLM (1993) Introduction to Commercial and Entrepreneurial Recreation. Champaign: Sagamore Publishing.
8.
GoeldnerCRRitchieJRB (2003) Tourism, Principles, Practices and Philosophies, 9th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9.
GrayHP (1970) Wanderlust and sunlust types [cited in N Leiper (1995)]. Tourism Management. Collingwood, Victoria: TAFE Publication, pp. 40–41.
10.
HofstedeG (2001) Cultural Consequences, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
11.
HudsonS (1999) Consumer behavior related to tourism. In PizamAMansfeldY (eds) Consumer Behavior in Travel and Tourism. New York: The Haworth Hospitality Press, pp. 7–32.
12.
LiMCaiLA (2012) The effects of personal values on travel motivations and behavior intention. Journal of Travel Research51(4): 473–487.
13.
LitvinSW (2006) Revisiting Plog’s model of allocentricity and psychocentricity … one more time. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly47(3): 245–253.
14.
LitvinSW (2010) Apocalypse not: a commentary on destination maturation models. Journal of Vacation Marketing16(2): 157–162.
15.
PlogSC (1974) Why destination areas rise and fall in popularity. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly14(4): 55–58.
16.
PlogSC (1990) A carpenter’s tools: an answer to Stephen L.J. Smith’s review of psychocentrism/allocentrism. Journal of Travel Research29(2): 43–45.
17.
PlogSC (1991) Leisure Travel: Making it a Growth Market … Again. New York: John Wiley & Son.
PlogSC (2001) Why destination areas rise and fall in popularity, an update of a classic. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly42(3): 13–24.
20.
PlogSC (2006) One mo, once: a commentary on the Litvin paper on the Plog Psychographic System. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly47(3): 254–259.
21.
RuskBM (1989) The perspectives and pitfalls of market segmentation studies in defining target markets for Canada’s tourism product. Proceedings of the Travel and Tourism Research Association Twentieth Annual Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 11–15, pp. 395–400.
22.
SmithSLJ (1990a) A test of Plog’s Allocentric/Psychocentric Model: evidence from seven nations. Journal of Travel Research28(4): 40–43.
23.
SmithSLJ (1990b) Another look at the carpenter’s tools: a reply to Plog. Journal of Travel Research29(2): 50–51.
