While existing research underscores the role of social media in promoting destination gastronomy and attracting food tourists, studies on destination live-streaming remain limited. Grounded in process virtualization theory, this study employs a mixed-methods approach to examine how viewers’ engagement with local gastronomy through destination live-streaming influences their gastronomy travel intentions. A qualitative study identifies five key characteristics of the virtualization mechanism: food visual appeal, food auditory imagery, social interaction, synchronicity, and source credibility. A subsequent quantitative study reveals that these characteristics positively influence process virtualizability, which in turn, enhances gastronomy travel intention. Destination gastronomy uniqueness moderates the relationship between process virtualizability and gastronomy travel intention. This study contributes to the growing literature on destination live-streaming and provides practical insights for live-streamers, live-streaming platforms, and destination marketers.
AckomPSOwusu KwatengKTettehFK, et al. (2022) Understanding e-government services: integration of process virtualization theory and user resistance. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance24(5): 418–434.
2.
AkarEYaran ÖgelİMedetoğluB (2024) How does gastronomy information presentation quality in social media affect the gastronomy destination image formation of travelers? A study on three gastronomy cities. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing41(7): 903–922.
3.
AkoğulESelçukGN (2025) Effect of international food tourists’ food experiences on place attachment and behavioral intentions: The moderating role of food variety seeking tendency. Journal of Vacation Marketing31(3): 753–770.
4.
AlarabiatAHujranOSoaresD, et al. (2023) Examining students’ continuous use of online learning in the post-COVID-19 era: an application of the process virtualization theory. Information Technology & People36(1): 21–47.
5.
AyabakanSBardhanIRZhengZ (2024) Impact of telehealth and process virtualization on healthcare utilization. Information Systems Research35(1): 45–65..
6.
BarbeitosIOliveiraT (2024) Continuance in Portuguese peer-to-peer accommodation services through the lens of process virtualization theory. Information Systems Management42(1): 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2024.2332197.
7.
BjörkPKauppinen-RäisänenH (2016) Local food: a source for destination attraction. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management28(1): 177–194.
8.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
9.
BrislinRW (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. Methodology2: 389–444.
10.
CankulDAriOPOkumusB (2021) The current practices of food and beverage photography and styling in food business. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology12(2): 287–306.
11.
ChenCFTsaiDC (2007) How destination image and evaluative factors affect behavioral intentions?Tourism Management28(4): 1115–1122.
12.
ChenXChenZ (2025) Impact of video content on gastronomic image construction and tourists’ intention to (re-) visit Macao. Tourism Recreation Research50(3): 506–520.https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2023.2296812.
13.
ChiCGDengDSChiOH, et al. (2024) Framing food tourism videos: what drives viewers’ attitudes and behaviors?Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research48(3): 533–548.
ComreyALLeeHB (1992) A first course in factor analysis. New York: Psychology Press.
17.
DaftRLLengelRH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science32(5): 554–571.
18.
DillmanDASmythJDChristianLM (2014) Internet, phone, mail, and mixed mode surveys: The tailored design method. 4th ed. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
19.
EllisAParkEKimS, et al. (2018) What is food tourism?Tourism Management68: 250–263.
20.
FanYWongIAZhangG, et al. (2024) A multiwave study on tourist well-being: the role of attention restoration, psychological-need and social-sharing satisfaction. Tourism Management Perspectives51: 101234.
21.
FengYParkJFengM (2023) What is holding back business process virtualization in the post-COVID-19 era? Based on process virtualization theory (PVT). Frontiers in Psychology14: 1084180.
22.
FrancisJJJohnstonMRobertsonC, et al. (2010) What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health25(10): 1229–1245.
23.
Fusté-FornéFFilimonN (2025) From post to table: the social media marketing of food tourism. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science39: 101107.
24.
GuoRYangZGaoH (2024) From screen to table: how Douyin food bloggers stimulate and convert viewer interests. Behavioral Sciences14(7): 602.
25.
HairJFHultGTMRingleCM, et al (2022) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 3rd ed.UK: Sage.
26.
HairJFTathamRLAndersonRE, et al. (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edUpper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
27.
HappESchnitzerMScholl-GrissemannU (2023) Ski touring on groomed slopes—exploring an alpine winter sports trend and potential tourism product. Tourism Management Perspectives48: 101155.
28.
HeXYeCHuangS, et al. (2024) The “green persuasion effect” of negative messages: How and when message framing influences tourists’ environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Travel Research. 00472875241289571.
29.
HenninkMKaiserBN (2022) Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine292. Article 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523.
30.
Hernández-MéndezJBaute-DíazNGutiérrez-TañoD (2024) The effectiveness of virtual versus human influencer marketing for tourism destinations. Journal of Vacation Marketing. 13567667241276212.
31.
HortonDRichard WohlR (1956) Mass communication and para-social interaction: observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry19(3): 215–229.
32.
HutchinsonWDjafarovaELiuS, et al. (2024) Investigating the impact of food tourism vlogger entrepreneurs’ language characteristics on audiences’ attitude and behaviours. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research30(2/3): 735–772.
33.
JiangYBalajiMSLyuC (2024) Cultivating initial trust in ghost kitchens: a mixed-methods investigation of antecedents and consequences. International Journal of Hospitality Management119: 103727.
34.
JiangYChenC (2019) Event attendance motives, host city evaluation, and behavioral intentions: an empirical study of Rio 2016. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management31(8): 3270–3286.
35.
JiangYLyuCChenW, et al. (2025) Following mega sports events on social media impacts Gen Z travelers’ sports tourism intentions: the case of the 2022 Winter Olympic Games. Tourism Recreation Research50(2): 282–296.
36.
JiangYXuL (2022) What motivates tourists to dine in small local restaurants? A study on Generation Z adults in China. Anatolia33(2): 285–288.
37.
KangJWLeeHNamkungY (2018) The impact of restaurant patrons’ flow experience on SNS satisfaction and offline purchase intentions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management30(2): 797–816.
38.
KovalenkoADiasÁPereiraL, et al. (2023) Gastronomic experience and consumer behavior: analyzing the influence on destination image. Foods (Basel, Switzerland)12(2): 315.
39.
LacapJPMoranasRDomasigKP, et al. (2024) The indirect effects of authentic value and attitude toward food vlogs on the link between trustworthiness and visit intentions: a serial mediation analysis. The South East Asian Journal of Management18(2): 1.
40.
LeeDWanC (2023) The impact of mukbang live streaming commerce on consumers’ overconsumption behavior. Journal of Interactive Marketing58(2-3): 198–221.
41.
LeeJLimHKimWG (2025) Gestalt food presentation: its influence on visual appeal and engagement in the Instagram context. Tourism Management107: 105080.
42.
LiMChengMQuintalV, et al. (2023) From live streamer to viewer: exploring travel live streamer persuasive linguistic styles and their impacts on travel intentions. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing40(8): 764–777.
43.
LiYHayesS (2024) Comparing the influences of tourism live streaming and short-form video for young Chinese: a qualitative investigation. Journal of China Tourism Research20(1): 167–191.
44.
LiYLiXCaiJ (2021) How attachment affects user stickiness on live streaming platforms: a socio-technical approach perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services60: 102478.
45.
LiangXHuoYLuoP (2024) What drives impulsive travel intention in tourism live streaming? A chain mediation model based on SOR framework. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing41(2): 169–185.
46.
LindellMKWhitneyDJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology86(1): 114–121.
47.
LiuQXuLFengW, et al. (2023) Is tourism live streaming a double-edged sword? The paradoxical impact of online flow experience on travel intentions. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing40(8): 744–763.
48.
LuohHFTsaurSHLoPC (2020) Cooking for fun: the sources of fun in cooking learning tourism. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management17: 100442.
49.
LyuCJiangYBalajiMS (2025a) From interaction rituals to mental restoration: the role of psychological ownership in synchronous technology-mediated tourism. Tourism Management111: 105231.
50.
LyuCXuWJiangY (2025b) Elderly tourists’ motives for virtual tourism and its impact on subjective vitality. International Journal of Tourism Research27: e70104.
51.
MaloneySAxelsenMStoneC, et al. (2023) Defining and exploring online engagement fatigue in a university context. Computers and Education Open4: 100139.
52.
OfoedaJBoatengRAsmahA (2018) Virtualization of government-to-citizen engagement process: enablers and constraints. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries84(5): e12037.
53.
OrbenACMutakADablanderF, et al. (2018) From face-to-face to Facebook: probing the effects of passive consumption on interpersonal attraction. Frontiers in Psychology9: 1163.
54.
OverbyE (2008) Process virtualization theory and the impact of information technology. Organization Science19(2): 277–291.
55.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJ-Y, et al. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
56.
PrayagGRyanC (2012) Antecedents of tourists’ loyalty to Mauritius: the role and influence of destination image, place attachment, personal involvement, and satisfaction. Journal of Travel Research51(3): 342–356.
PuBDuCPhauI (2024) Effects of food experience on travel intention to the country of origin of food cuisine: a cross national study. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management58: 476–494.
59.
RoustaAJamshidiD (2020) Food tourism value: investigating the factors that influence tourists to revisit. Journal of Vacation Marketing26(1): 73–95.
60.
SalimMNHAzinuddinMMior ShariffuddinNS, et al. (2024) Destination social media foodscape and visit intention: double mediation assessment of food destination attractiveness and familiarity among gastronomy tourists. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology: 1–27. doi:10.1080/15428052.2024.2414059
61.
ScarpiDRaggiottoF (2023) A construal level view of contemporary heritage tourism. Tourism Management94: 104648.
62.
ShenYDuJLiuY, et al. (2024) The effect of social presence on user's participation willingness under tourism live streaming. International Journal of Tourism Research26(5): 2777.
63.
SilabanPHChenWKEunikeIJ, et al. (2023) Traditional restaurant managers’ use of sensory marketing to maintain customer satisfaction: findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Cogent Business & Management10(1): 2196788.
64.
SimmeringMJFullerCMRichardsonHAOcalYAtincGM (2015) Marker variable choice, reporting, and interpretation in the detection of common method variance: A review and demonstration. Organizational Research Methods18(3): 473–511.
65.
SthapitEPiramanayayagamSBjörkP (2020) Tourists’ motivations, emotions, and memorable local food experiences. Gastronomy and Tourism5(1): 17–32.
66.
TangYZhangYNingX (2023) Uncertainty in the platform market: the information asymmetry perspective. Computers in Human Behavior148: 107918.
67.
TomásSThomasMOliveiraT (2018) Evaluating the impact of virtualization characteristics on SaaS adoption. Enterprise Information Systems12(3): 259–278.
68.
TreemJWLeonardiPM (2013) Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association36(1): 143–189.
69.
VigliaGDolnicarSAcutiD, et al. (2024) If you want to learn about real behaviour, measure real behaviour. Journal of Sustainable Tourism32(11): 2245–2257.
70.
WongIASunDXiongX, et al. (2023) Craving alterreal authenticity through the post-postmodern lens: an experimental inquiry. Tourism Management94: 104654.
71.
XiaoGLeeMLeeCK, et al. (2025) Tourism live streamers as brand ambassadors: investigating their impact on destination brand value through social exchange theory. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology16(1): 174–193.
72.
YangZWangSYoonTH (2024) The effect of short-form video on travel decision-making process: an integration of AIDA and MGB models. International Journal of Tourism Research26(1): 2632.
73.
YuCCheahJHLiuY (2022) To stream or not to stream? Exploring factors influencing impulsive consumption through gastronomy livestreaming. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management34(9): 3394–3416.
74.
ZeugeASchaeferCWeigelA, et al. (2023) Crisis-driven digital transformation as a trigger for process virtualization: fulfilling knowledge work process requirements for remote work. International Journal of Information Management70: 102636.
75.
ZhangSNLiYQRuanWQ, et al. (2022) Would you enjoy virtual travel? The characteristics and causes of virtual tourists’ sentiment under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Tourism Management88: 104429.
76.
ZhangTLiBHuaN (2025a) Live-streaming tourism: model development and validations. Journal of Travel Research64(3): 559–575.
77.
ZhangZLiangXXueJ, et al. (2025b) Beneficial or troublesome? Revealing the double-edged effects of tourism live streaming affordances on viewers’ engagement. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing42(1): 133–159.
78.
ZhengCChenZZhangY, et al. (2022) Does vivid imagination deter visitation? The role of mental imagery processing in virtual tourism on tourists’ behavior. Journal of Travel Research61(7): 1528–1541.
79.
ZhengSWuMLiaoJ (2023) The impact of destination live streaming on viewers’ travel intention. Current Issues in Tourism26(2): 184–198.
80.
ZhouZWenSLiTT, et al. (2024) Virtual streamer and destination visitation: an attractiveness transfer perspective. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management33: 100922.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
