Collaborative evaluation engages key program stakeholders actively in the evaluation process. Distance between external evaluators and program staff is often minimal, based on the assumption that a collaborative stance will strengthen evaluation results and increase utilization of evaluation findings. Convincing empirical evidence to support these assumptions is scarce. This study uses evaluation findings from a county-wide, comprehensive, early childhood education initiative to support the contention that a collaborative approach can substantively improve evaluation findings.
Barley, A.Z. and M. Jenness (1993) `Cluster Evaluation: A Method to Strengthen Evaluation in Smaller Programs with Similar Purposes', Evaluation Practice14(2): 141-7.
2.
Burke, B. (1998) `Evaluation for a Change: Reflections on Participatory Methodology', New Directions for Program Evaluation80: 43-56.
3.
Callaway, S., M. Arnold and P. Norman (eds) (1993) Community Voices: Leadership Development for Community Decision-making, Program Implementation Guide. Prepared with Funding from the W. K. Kellogg Foundation . Greensboro, NC: Cooperative Extension Program, North Carolina A&T State University.
4.
Chelimsky, E. (1986) `What Have We Learned about the Politics of Program Evaluation', Evaluation Practice8(1): 5-22.
5.
Ciarlo, J. A., ed. (1981) Utilizing Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Coupal, F.P. and M. Simoneau (1998) `A Case Study of Participatory Evaluation in Haiti' , New Directions for Program Evaluation80: 69-79.
7.
Cousins, J.B. and L.M. Earl (1992) `The Case for Participatory Evaluation', Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis14(4): 397-418.
8.
Cousins, J.B. and L.M. Earl (1995) Participatory Evaluation in Education: Studies of Evaluation Use and Organizational Learning. London: Falmer.
9.
Cousins, J.B., J.J. Donohue and G.A. Bloom (1996) `Collaborative Evaluation in North America: Evaluators' Self-reported Opinions, Practices, and Consequences', Evaluation Practice17(3): 207-26.
10.
Cousins, J.B. and E. Whitmore (1998) `Framing Participatory Evaluation', New Directions for Program Evaluation80: 5-23.
11.
Fetterman, D.M. (1995) `In Response to Dr Daniel Stufflebeam's "Empowerment Evaluation, Objectivist Evaluation, and Evaluation Standards: Where the Future of Evaluation Should Not Go and Where It Needs to Go" ', Evaluation Practice16(2): 179-99.
12.
Fetterman, D.M. (1996) `Empowerment Evaluation: An Introduction to Theory and Practice', in D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian and A. Wandersman (eds) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment and Accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Gaventa, J., V. Creed and J. Morrissey (1998) `Scaling Up: Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation of a Federal Empowerment Program', New Directions for Program Evaluation80: 81-94.
14.
Greene, J.G. (1987) `Stakeholder Participation and Utilization in Program Evaluation', Evaluation Review12(2): 91-116.
15.
Guba, E.G. and Y.S. Lincoln (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Henry, R. (1992) `A Delicate Balance: The Role of the Cluster Evaluator in Relation to the Foundation Project Directors'. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Evaluation Association . 4-7 November, Seattle, WA.
17.
Jenness, M. and Z.A. Barley (1992) `A Constructivist Approach to Cluster Evaluation' . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Evaluation Association. 4-7 November, Seattle, WA.
18.
Kellogg Foundation (1991) Information on Cluster Evaluation. Battlecreek, MIAuthor.
19.
King, J.A. (1998) `Making Sense of Participatory Evaluation Practice' , New Directions for Program Evaluation80: 57-67.
20.
Knott, T.D. (1988) `The Impact of Major Consumer Groups on Health Care Evaluation', New Directions for Program Evaluation39: 33-46.
21.
Levin, H.M. (1996) `Empowerment Evaluation and Accelerated Schools' , in D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian and A. Wandersman (eds) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment and Accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Linney, J.A. and A. Wandersman (1996) `Empowering Community Groups with Evaluation Skills: The Prevention Plus III Model', in D. M. Fetterman , S. J. Kaftarian and A. Wandersman (eds) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment and Accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Mansberger, N.B. (1993) `Making Sense Out of a Mixed Bag of Data: The Use of Working Hypotheses'. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Dallas, TX, 3-6 November.
24.
Mowbray, C.T. (1988) `Getting the System to Respond to Evaluation Findings' , New Directions for Program Evaluation39: 47-58.
25.
O'Sullivan, R.G. (1989) `A Positive Paradigm for Pondering: Wholistic Health and Educational Program Evaluation'. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North Carolina Association for Research in Education : Research Triangle Park, NC.
26.
O'Sullivan, R.G. (1995) `From Judges to Collaborators: Evaluators' Role in Science Curriculum Reform', New Directions for Program Evaluation65: 19-30.
27.
O'Sullivan, R.G., J. Clinton, H. Schmidt-Davis and S. Wall (1996) First Year Smart Start Evaluation of the Forsyth Early Childhood Partnership. Greensboro, NC: Teaching to Diversity, University of North Carolina at Greensboro .
28.
O'Sullivan, R.G., A. D'Agostino, B. Prohm, L. Roche and H. Schmidt-Davis (1997) 1997 Annual Evaluation Report of the Forsyth Early Childhood Partnership. Greensboro, NC: Teaching to Diversity, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
29.
O'Sullivan, R.G. and J.M. O'Sullivan (1994) `Evaluation Voices: Promoting Cluster Evaluation from Within Programs'. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Evaluation Society: Quebec, Canada.
30.
O'Sullivan, R.G. and J.M. O'Sullivan (1998) `Evaluation Voices: Promoting Evaluation from Within Programs through Collaboration', Evaluation and Program Planning21(1): 21-9.
Patton, M.Q. (1988) `Integrating Evaluation into a Program for Increased Utility and Cost-effectiveness', New Directions for Program Evaluation39: 85-94.
Pearl, J.B. and A. Rubino (1993) `The Power of Cluster Evaluation Networking Conferences' , Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Dallas, TX, 3-6 November.
35.
Scriven, M. (1996a) `Evaluation: The State of the Art', in Proceedings of the Australasian Evaluation Society; extracts in Evaluation News and Comment5(2).
36.
Scriven, M. (1996b) `Types of Evaluation and Types of Evaluators' , Evaluation Practice17(2): 151-61.
37.
Seefeldt, M. (1992) `Conflicts in Conceptual Framework, Design, Audience Expectation, and Evaluator Style'. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Evaluation Association. 4-7 November, Seattle, WA.
38.
Smith, M.F. (1988) `Evaluation Utilization Revisited', New Directions for Program Evaluation39: 7-20.
39.
Stevens, C.T. and M. Dial (1994) `What Constitutes Misuse?'New Directions for Program Evaluation64: 3-14.
40.
Stufflebeam, D.L. (1994) `Empowerment Evaluation, Objectivist Evaluation, and Evaluation Standards: Where the Future of Evaluation Should Not Go and Where it Needs to Go', Evaluation Practice15(3): 321-38.
41.
Weiss, C.H. (1998) `Have we Learned Anything New About the Use of Evaluation?' American Journal of Evaluation19(1): 21-33.
