The support of enterprise networks has an important role in the strategies and implementation of the EU’s cohesion policy programmes. Clustering and networking has become an instrument to increase the competitiveness of enterprises and consequently to create output and employment growth in less advantaged regions. However, so far, there is only weak evidence of the effects of networking projects on the competitiveness and business success of participating enterprises and on regional development. The article is based on a pilot study that tests network analysis as a method for evaluating networking projects, supported by the European Regional Development Fund. The study applied network analysis to identify a firm’s position in the project network and statistical methods to test the significance of identified network features that might explain business development. Preliminary results indicate that network characteristics can predict firm-level business indicators and firms’ assessments of the benefits of participating in the projects.
AbbottA (1997) Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the Chicago school. Social Forces75(4): 1149–82.
2.
AhvenharjuSHalonenMHjeltM. (2011) EAKR-toimenpideohjelmien ja kansallisen rakennerahastostrategian 2007–2013 arviointi vuosina 2007–2010. Teema 2: Innovaatiotoiminnan ja verkostoitumisen edistäminen ja osaamisrakenteiden vahvistaminen. Loppuraportti. Report, Ministry of Employment and the Economy, Finland, June.
3.
AnandBNKhannaT (2000) Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management Journal21(3): 295–315.
4.
AudretschDFeldmanM (2004) Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In: ThisseJ-F (eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Volume 4. Cities and Geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland, 2713–39.
5.
BaumJACCalabreseT (2000) Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal21(3): 267–94.
GouldRFernandezR (1989) Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology19(1): 89–126.
17.
GranovetterM (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–80.
18.
GranovetterM (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology91(3): 481–510.
19.
GranovetterM (1994) Business groups. In: SmelserNJSwedbergR (eds) The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 453–75.
20.
GulatiR (1998) Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal19(4): 293–317.
21.
GulatiRGargiuloM (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from?American Journal of Sociology104(5): 1439–93.
22.
JohansonJ-EMattilaMUusikyläP (1995) Johdatus verkostoanalyysiin. Helsinki: National Consume Research Centre.
23.
KalePSinghHPerlmutterH (2000) Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal21(3): 217–37.
24.
KatzNLazerD (2003) Building effective intra-organizational networks: The role of teams. Available at: http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/teamwork (accessed 3 January 2012).
25.
KoskiHPajarinenM (2010) Do business subsidies facilitate employment growth? Elinkeinoelämän Tutkimuslaitos: Keskusteluaiheita No 1235.
26.
LaaksoSKilpeläinenPItkonenK (2004) Keski-Suomen toimialatyön arviointi. Jyväskylä: Regional Council of Central Finland.
OliverAL (2001) Strategic alliances and the learning life-cycle of biotechnology firms. Organization Studies22(3): 467–89.
30.
PallaGDerényiIFarkasI. (2005) Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature435(7043): 814–18.
31.
PorterME (1998) Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review76(6): 77–90.
32.
PowellWWKoputKWSmith-DoerrL (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly41(1): 116–45.
33.
PowellWWKoputKWWhiteDR. (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology110(4): 1132–205.
StuartTE (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation. Strategic Management Journal21(8): 791–811.
36.
TokilaA (2011) Econometric studies of public support to entrepreneurship. PhD Thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
37.
TokilaATohmoTKilpeläinenP. (2008) Eteläisen Keski-Suomen Puualan ja Teräksen taitajat -projektin arviointiraportti. Report, JYKES, Finland, March.
38.
VedresBStarkD (2010) Structural folds: Generative disruption in overlapping groups. American Journal of Sociology115(4): 1150–90.
