We are currently being challenged to urgently address the environmental crisis. Intervening in this complex ecology creates the need to adopt approaches that will reconcile natural and human systems, approaches for Planetary Health. In this article, we present a Planetary Health Framework as a conceptual dialogic approach for designing and evaluating interventions. Natural and human systems dimensions have been conceptualized in an integrated way, based on existing scientific knowledge. This framework is intended to be applied using a dialogic approach. We will also show, schematically, how the use of this approach can be overlaid on each of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals. The overall aim of this article is to contribute to a transformation in our field, to expand our role from existing narrowly focused evaluation practices to taking into account in our work, how interventions do or do not make a contribution to building a better future for all.
AlexanderS (2015a) Prosperous Descent: Crisis as an Opportunity in the Age of Limits, Collected Essays, vol. 1. Melbourne: Simplicity Institute.
2.
AlexanderS (2015b) Sufficiency Economy: Enough, for Everyone, Forever, Collected Essays, vol. 2. Melbourne: Simplicity Institute.
3.
BiermannF (2012) Planetary boundaries and earth system governance: Exploring the links. Ecological Economics81: 4–9.
4.
BlackDMorrisJNSmithC, et al. (1980) Inequalities in Health: The Black Report: The Health Divide. London: Penguin Books.
5.
BrousselleAMcDavidJ (2020) Evaluators in the Anthropocene. Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice26(2): 190–204.
6.
BuregeyaJ-MLoignonCBrousselleA (2019) Contribution to healthy places: Risks of equity free health impact assessment. Evaluation and Program Planning73: 138–45.
ChampagneFContandriopoulosAPBrousselleA, et al. (2017) L’évaluation dans le domaine de la santé: concepts et méthodes. In: BrousselleAChampagneFContadnriopoulosAP, et al. (eds) L’évaluation: Concepts et Méthodes. Montreal, QC, Canada: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, 49–70.
10.
DaleARobinsonJKingL, et al. (2020) Meeting the climate change challenge: Local government climate action in British Columbia, Canada. Climate Policy20: 866–80.
GubaEGLincolnYS (1989) The coming of age of evaluation. In: GubaEGLincolnYS (eds) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 21–49.
13.
KaranikolosMMladovskyPCylusJ, et al. (2013) Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe. The Lancet381(9874): 1323–31.
14.
LindblomC (1990) Inquiry and Change. London: Yale University Press.
15.
MathisonS (2018) Does evaluation contribute to the public good?Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice24(1): 113–19.
16.
Montrosse-MoorheadBBitarKArévaloJ, et al. (2019) Revolution in the making: Evaluation “done well” in the era of the SDGs with a youth participatory approach. In: Van den BergRDMagroCSalinas MulderS (eds) Evaluation for Transformational Change: Opportunities and Challenges for the Sustainable Development Goals. Exeter: IDEAS. https://ideas-global.org/transformational-evaluation/ (accessed 5 December 2019).
17.
NeriniFFSovacoolBHughesN, et al. (2019) Connecting climate action with other sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability2: 674–80.
18.
O’NeillDWFanningALLambWF, et al. (2018) A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability1(2): 88–95.
19.
PattonMQ (2011) Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Evaluation Use. New York: Guilford Press.
20.
PattonMQ (2020) Blue Marble Evaluation: Premises and Principles. New York: Guilford Press.
21.
PaulyD (2009) Aquacalypse now: The end of fish. The New Republic240(18): 24–7.
22.
PicciottoR (2015) Democratic evaluation for the 21st century. Evaluation21(2): 150–6.
23.
RaworthK (2017) Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st Century Economist. Hartford, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
RockströmJSteffenWNooneK, et al. (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature461: 472–5.
26.
Romero-LankaoPBulkeleyHPellingM, et al. (2018) Urban transformative potential in a changing climate. Nature Climate Change8: 754–6.
27.
RoweA (2018) Ecological thinking as a route to sustainability in evaluation. In: HopsonRCramF (eds) Tackling Wicked Problems in Complex Ecologies: The Role of Evaluation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 25–44.
28.
RoweA (2019) Sustainability-ready evaluation: A call to action (ed G Julnes). New Directions for Evaluation162: 29–48.
29.
Sánchez-BayoFWyckhuysKAG (2019) Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers. Biological Conservation232: 8–27.
SteffenWRichardsonKRockströmJ, et al. (2015) Sustainability: Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science347: 1259855.
32.
SternerTBarbierEBBatemanI, et al. (2019) Policy design for the Anthropocene. Nature Sustainability2: 14–21.
33.
StucklerDBasuS (2013) The Body Economic: Why Austerity Kills. New York: Basic Books.
34.
StucklerDBasuSSuhrckeM, et al. (2009) The public health effect of economic crises and alternative policy responses in Europe: An empirical analysis. The Lancet374(9686): 315–23.
TuckerCK (2019) A Planet of 3 Billion: Mapping Humanity’s Long History of Ecological Destruction and Finding Our Way to a Resilient Future. Washington, DC: Atlas Observatory Press.
37.
UittoJI (2019) Sustainable development evaluation: Understanding the nexus of natural and human systems (ed G Julnes). New Directions for Evaluation162: 49–67.
38.
UittoJIPuriJvan den BergRD (2017) Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development. Cham: Springer.
39.
United Nations (1997) Chapter IV: Coordination segment: Coordination of the policies and activities of the specialized agencies and other bodies of the United Nations system. Available at: https://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/pdf/ECOSOCAC1997.2.PDF (accessed 28 February 2020).
Van Der BergRDMagroCSalinas MulderS (2019) Introduction: Bringing challenges for evaluation for transformational change from Guanajuato to Prague. In: Van den BergRDMagroCSalinas MulderS (eds) Evaluation for Transformational Change: Opportunities and Challenges for the Sustainable Development Goals. Exeter: IDEAS. Available at: https://ideas-global.org/transformational-evaluation/ (accessed 5 December 2019).
43.
WaridelL (2019) La transition, c’est maintenant: Choisir aujourd’hui ce que sera demain. Montreal, QC, Canada: Ecosociété.
44.
WhitmeeSHainesABeyrerC, et al. (2015) Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: Report of The Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on planetary health. The Lancet386(10007): 1973–2028.
45.
WoodhouseELindblomC (1993) The Policy-making Process, 3rd edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46.
World Health Organization (WHO) (1946) Preamble to the Constitution of WHO (Adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19 June–22 July 1946; signed on 22 July 1946). Available at: https://www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf (accessed 20 December 2019).
