Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Social impact investing is the use of private investment to fund social programs in various public welfare sectors. It is currently unclear which evaluative practices are used to determine the impact of social investment. This study describes how impact investments are evaluated and the factors that help explain variations in practice through survey (N = 161) and interview (N = 13) data from investors, intermediaries, entrepreneurs, and analysts. Study findings indicate that analysts typically rely on descriptive quantitative and qualitative data and analyses. Analysts’ background, training, and role; perceptions of the goals of the work; and the complexity of a program’s theory influence their evaluation approach. More nuanced or indirect impacts of investments may not be captured because evaluation activities tend to be limited in scope and scale. Future research should explore the work of those directly responsible for impact activities to better understand the conditions under which more sophisticated evaluation approaches might be employed.

Keywords

evaluation research on evaluation social impact investing social impact measurement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bannick

Goldman

Lee

. (2014) International development: Subject paper of the International Development Working Group. Available at: http://www.socialimpactinvestment.org/reports/International%20Development%20WG%20paper%20FINAL.pdf.

Bebbington

Gray

Owen

(1999) Seeing the wood for the trees: Taking the pulse of social and environmental accounting. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 12(1): 47–51.

Benford

Birnbaum

Dombrowski

(2014) Social Impact Investing: Financing Social Change. Gütersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

Best

Harji

(2012) Guidebook for Impact Investors: Impact Measurement. Toronto, Canada: Venture Deli/Purpose Capital.

Bonini

Emerson

(2005) Maximizing blended value: Building beyond the blended value map to sustainable investing, philanthropy and organizations. Available at: http://www.blendedvalue.org/wp-content/uploads/2004/02/pdf-max-blendedvalue.pdf.

Bonnet

(1992) Independent evaluation consulting TIG: 1992 industry survey. Evaluation Practice 13(3): 225–31.

Brest

Born

(2013) Up for debate: When can impact investing create real impact? Stanford Social Innovation Review 22–31.

Brewer

Hunter

(1989) Multimethod Research: A Synthesis of Styles. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

Bugg-Levine

Emerson

(2011) Impact Investing: Transforming How We Make Money While Making a Difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

10.

Christie

Masyn

(2010) Latent profiles of evaluators’ self-reported practice. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 2: 225–54.

11.

Christie

Quinones

Fierro

(2014) Informing the discussion on evaluator training: A look at evaluators’ course taking and professional practice. American Journal of Evaluation 35(2): 274–90.

12.

Cracknell

(1996) Evaluating aid development. Evaluation 2(1): 23–33.

13.

Crutchfield

McLeod Grant

(2012) Forces for Good: The Six Practices of High-Impact Nonprofits, Vol. 403. New York: Wiley.

14.

Deloitte

LLP

(2014) The State of the State 2014–2015: Government’s Inflection Point. New York: Deloitte LLP.

15.

Ebrahim

Rangan

(2010) The limits of nonprofit impact: A contingency framework for measuring social performance (Working Paper No. 10–099). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School General Management Unit.

16.

Emerson

(2003) The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review 45(4): 35–51.

17.

Global Impact Investing Network (2014) Impact reporting and investment standards (IRIS) fact sheet. Available at: https://iris.thegiin.org/assets/files/IRIS%20Factsheet%20August%202014.pdf.

18.

House

Howe

(2000) Deliberative democratic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation 85: 3–12.

19.

Hwang

Powell

(2009) The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit Sector. Administrative Science Quarterly 54(2): 268–98.

20.

Initiative for Global Development (2013) The business value of impact measurement. Available at: http://www.igdleaders.org/wp-content/uploads/Business_Value_of_Impact_Measurement_FINAL.pdf.

21.

Ivaldi

Scaratti

Nuti

(2015) The practice of evaluation as an evaluation of practices. Evaluation 21(4): 497–512.

22.

Jarosewich

Essenmacher

Lynch

. (2006) Independent consulting topical interest group: 2004 industry survey. New Directions for Evaluation 111: 9–21.

23.

Leeuw

(2002) Evaluation in Europe 2000: Challenges to a growth industry. Evaluation 8(1): 5–12.

24.

Milstein

Wetterhall

(1999) Framework for program evaluation in public health. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 48(RR-11): 1–39.

25.

Nicholls

(2009) We do good things, don’t we? Blended value accounting in social entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(6): 755–69.

26.

Olsen

Galimidi

(2008) Catalog of Approaches to Impact Measurement: Assessing Social Impact in Private Ventures. New York: Rockfeller Foundation.

27.

Petrick

Weber

(2013) The social impact investment ecosystem in Germany: Input for the meeting of the social impact investing taskforce established by the G8. Gütersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann Stiftung. Available at: http://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/user_upload/Impact_Investing_Ecosystem_Germany.pdf.

28.

Power

(1999) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

29.

Quarter

Mook

Richmond

(2003) What Counts: Social Accounting for Nonprofits and Cooperatives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

30.

Reeder

Colantonio

(2013) Measuring impact and non-financial returns in impact investing: A critical overview of concepts and practice (EIBURS Working Paper No. 2013/01). London: London School of Economics and Political Science. Available at: http://files.lsecities.net/files/2013/10/Measuring_Impact-full-length-Oct-2013.pdf.

31.

Richmond

Mook

Quarter

(2003) Social accounting for nonprofits: Two models. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 13(4): 308–24.

32.

Roche

(1999) Impact Assessment for Development Agencies: Learning to Value Change. Oxford: Oxfam.

33.

Rossi

Freeman

(1993) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, 5th edn. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

34.

Seymour

Ormiston

Dickson

(2013) Exploring the relationships between social impact assessment, strategy, practitioners, and praxis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics, Milan, Italy, June.

35.

Shadish

Cook

Leviton

(1991) Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories of Practice. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

36.

Sharir

Lerner

(2006) Gauging the success of social ventures initiated by individual social entrepreneurs. Journal of World Business 41: 6–20.

37.

Staskevicius

(2015) Measuring the ‘Impact’ in Impact Investing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Social Enterprise Initiative.

38.

Tashakkori

Teddlie

(1998) Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

39.

Vanclay

(2003) International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 21(1): 5–12.

40.

Weisbrod

(2004) The pitfalls of profits. Stanford Social Innovation Review 2: 40–7.

41.

World Bank (2003) Social Analysis Sourcebook: Incorporating Social Dimensions into Bank-Supported Projects. Washington, DC: World Bank.

42.

World Bank (2016) World Bank Group support tops $61 billion in fiscal year 2016. [Press Release]. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2016/07/12/world-bank-group-support-tops-61-billion-in-fiscal-year-2016.

Understanding evaluation practice within the context of social investment

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References