BarnesMMatkaESullivanH (2003) Evidence, understanding and complexity: Evaluation in non-linear systems. Evaluation9(3): 265–84.
2.
BartelsJ (1987) Kennis, geschiedenis, objectiviteit. Een filosofische reflectie op enkele ontwikkelingen in de wetenschapstheorie [Knowledge, history, objectivism: a philosophical reflection on certain developments in the theory of sciences]. Groningen: Konstapel.
3.
BolinskaA (2013) Epistemic representation, informativeness and the aim of faithful representation. Synthese190(2): 219–34.
4.
ByrneDS (1998) Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: An Introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.
5.
ByrneDS (2013) Evaluating complex social interventions in a complex world. Evaluation19(3): 217–28.
6.
ByrneDSCallaghanG (2014) Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: The State of the Art. London: Routledge.
7.
CallaghanG (2008) Evaluation and negotiated order: Developing the application of complexity theory. Evaluation14(4): 399–411.
ChecklandP (1981) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. New York: Wiley.
10.
ChettiparambA (2006) Metaphors in complexity theory and planning. Planning Theory5(1): 71–91.
11.
ColanderDKupersR (2014) Complexity and the Art of Public Policy: Solving Society’s Problems from the Bottom Up. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
DaviesR (2004) Scale, complexity and the representation of theories of change. Evaluation10(1): 101–21.
13.
EhrlichPRRavenPH (1964) Butterflies and plants: A study in coevolution. Evolution18(4): 586–608.
FloodRL (1999) Rethinking the Fifth Discipline: Learning Within the Unknowable. London: Routledge.
16.
ForresterJW (1971) World Dynamics. Cambridge: Wright-Allen Press.
17.
ForssKMarraMSchwartzR (eds) (2011) Evaluating the Complex: Attribution, Contribution, and Beyond. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
18.
FrançoisC (1999) Systemics and cybernetics in a historical perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science16(3): 203–19.
19.
FunnellSCRogersPJ (2011) Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
GerritsLM (2012) Punching Clouds: An Introduction to the Complexity of Public Decision-Making. Litchfield Park, AZ: Emergent Publications.
21.
GerritsLMMarksPK (2014) How fitness landscapes help further the social and behavioral sciences. Emergence: Complexity & Organization16(3): 1–17.
22.
GundersonLHHollingCS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
23.
HargreavesMBPodemsD (2012) Advancing systems thinking in evaluation: A review of four publications. American Journal of Evaluation33(3): 462–70.
24.
JuarreroARubinoCA (eds) (2010) Emergence, Complexity, and Self-organization: Precursors and Prototypes. Litchfield Park, AZ: Emergent Publications.
25.
KnuuttilaT (2011) Modelling and representing: An artefactual approach to model-based representation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A42(2): 262–71.
26.
McKelveyB (1999) Complexity theory in organization science: Seizing the promise or becoming a fad?Emergence1(1): 5–32.
27.
MarionR (1999) The Edge of Organization: Chaos and Complexity Theories of Formal Social Systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
28.
MitchellM (2009) Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
MorellJA (2010) Evaluation in the Face of Uncertainty: Anticipating Surprise and Responding to the Inevitable. New York: The Guilford Press.
30.
MowlesC (2014) Complex, but not quite complex enough: The turn to the complexity sciences in evaluation scholarship. Evaluation20(2): 160–75.
31.
PageSE (2011) Diversity and Complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
PattonMQ (2011) Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York: The Guilford Press.
33.
PattonMQ (2015) Book review: Evaluating the complex: attribution, contribution, and beyond. American Journal of Evaluation36: 419–29.
34.
PhelanSE (1999) A note on the correspondence between complexity and systems theory. Systemic Practice and Action Research12(3): 237–45.
35.
PrigogineIStengersI (1984) Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. New York: Bantam.
36.
RescherN (1998) Complexity: A Philosophical Overview. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
37.
RogersPJ (2008) Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Evaluation14(1): 29–48.
38.
RogersPJ (2011) Implications of complicated and complex characteristics for key tasks in evaluation. In: ForssKMarraMSchwartzR (eds), Evaluating the Complex: Attribution, Contribution, and Beyond. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 33–52.
39.
SandersonI (2000) Evaluation in complex policy systems. Evaluation6(4): 433–54.
40.
SengePM (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.
41.
SimonHA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society106(6): 467–82.
42.
StaceyRD (1992) Managing the Unknowable: Strategic Boundaries between Order and Chaos in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43.
StaceyRD (2012) Tools and Techniques of Leadership and Management: Meeting the Challenge of Complexity. London: Routledge.
44.
SwoyerC (1991) Structural representation and surrogative reasoning. Synthese87(3): 449–508.
45.
VerweijS (2015) Once the Shovel Hits the Ground: Evaluating the Management of Complex Implementation Processes of Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects with Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
46.
VerweijSGerritsLM (2013) Understanding and researching complexity with qualitative comparative analysis: Evaluating transportation infrastructure projects. Evaluation19(1): 40–55.
47.
VesterbyV (2008) Origins of Self-organization: Emergence and Cause. Goodyear, AZ: ISCE Publishing.
48.
Von BertalanffyL (1968) General System Theory. Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller.
49.
WaldropMM (1992) Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
50.
WaltonM (2014) Applying complexity theory: A review to inform evaluation design. Evaluation and Program Planning45: 119–26.
51.
WesthorpG (2012) Using complexity-consistent theory for evaluating complex systems. Evaluation18(4): 405–20.
52.
WestleyFZimmermanBPattonM (2007) Getting to Maybe: How the World Is Changed. Toronto: Vintage Canada
53.
WilliamsBHummelbrunnerR (2010) Systems Concepts in Action: A Practitioner’s Toolkit. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
54.
Wolf-BraniginM (2013) Using Complexity Theory for Research and Program Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
ZimmermanBLindbergCPlsekP (1998) Edgeware: Lessons from Complexity Science for Health Care Leaders. London: V H A, Incorporated.