Using social network analysis to evaluate a complex policy network

Abstract

There are many challenges in evaluating international networks within the fields of health and international development. Use of conventional tools is not only difficult but may fail to provide the kind of information that is developmentally useful. Social network analysis tools offer many benefits for network evaluators. In particular, they allow documentation and analysis of inter-relationships between individuals and organizations, pointing to potential gaps as well as areas of development. This article describes the use of such tools in the evaluation of Sexuality Policy Watch (SPW), a global forum of organizations and individuals active within the field of sexuality, health and rights. It highlights the potential of these tools to provide visual representations of complex relationships within networks. In this case, the tools enabled the representation of SPW as a complex but ordered network, focused on sexual and reproductive rights, composed of individuals with a multiplicity of organizational affiliations.

Keywords

networks sexual health sexuality sexual rights social network analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amirkhanian

Kelly

Kabakchieva

McAuliffe

Vassileva

(2003) Social network HIV prevention intervention program for young men who have sex with men in Russia and Bulgaria. AIDS Education and Prevention 15(3): 205–20.

Davies

(2009) The use of social network analysis tools in the evaluation of social change communications. Unpublished manuscript produced as an input into a background conceptual paper for the Communication for Social Change Communication. URL (consulted 9 March 2011): http://www.communicationforsocialchange.org/pdfs/2nd%20draft%20the%20use%20of%20social%20network%20analysis%20tools%20in%20the%20evaluation%20of%20social%20change%20communications%20b.pdf

Drew

Aggleton

Boyce

Chalmers

Maxwell

Pachauri

Thomas

Warwick

Wood

(2009) Social network analysis to evaluate organizational networks on sexual health and rights. Development in Practice 21(7).

Durland

Fredericks

(2006) Social Network Analysis in Program Evaluation. New Directions in Evaluation, No. 107. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass/American Evaluation Association.

Hanneman

Riddle

(2005) Two mode networks. In: Hanneman

Riddle

(eds) Introduction to Social Network Methods. University of California, Riverside, Chapter 17. URL (consulted 9 March 2011): http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/C17_Two_mode.html

Institute of Education (2009) Evaluation of the Ford Foundation’s Global Dialogue on Sexual Health and Well-Being. Web Research summary. URL (consulted 9 March 2011): http://www.ioe.ac.uk/study/departments/tcru/5229.html

Newman

(2010) Networks: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Newman

Barabási

A-L

Watts

(2006) The Structure and Dynamics of Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Wasserman

Faust

(1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Wilson-Grau

(2007) Evaluating the efforts of international advocacy networks. Paper presented at the Advocacy Impact Evaluation Workshop at the Evans School for Public Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 4–6 September.

11.

Wilson-Grau

Nuñez

(2007) Evaluating international social-change networks: a conceptual framework for a participatory approach. Development in Practice 17(2): 258–71