In this article we develop a ‘Stakeholder Mapping’ approach to ex-ante policy evaluation. The proposed framework helps to assess policy implementation activities by applying several tests to evaluate the completeness, non-redundancy, proper assignment and internal consistency of a policy design. We illustrate the method by applying it to the analysis of e-commerce policy in Iran. We conclude by assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the approach.
Arnold, E. ( 2004) ‘Evaluating Research and Innovation Policy: A Systems World Needs Systems Evaluations’, Research Evaluation13: 3-17.
2.
Bereaux, E. ( 2008) The Complete Guide to Project Management for New Managers and Management Assistants: How to Get Things Done in Less Time. Ocala, FL: Atlantic Publishing Co.
3.
Beywl, W. and P. Potter ( 1998) ‘RENOMO - A Design Tool for Evaluations: Designing Evaluations REsponsive to Stakeholders’ Interests by Working with NOminal Groups using the MOderation Method’, Evaluation4: 53-71.
4.
Brinkerhoff, D.W. ( 1991) Improving Development Program Performance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
5.
Brugha, R. and Z. Varvasovszky ( 2000) ‘Stakeholder Analysis: A Review’, Health Policy and Planning15: 239-46.
6.
Carlsson, L. ( 2000) ‘Non-Hierarchical Evaluation of Policy’, Evaluation6: 201-16.
7.
Clark, T. and A. Evans ( 1997) Foundations of the Unified Modeling Language. Second Northern Formal Methods Workshop. Norwell, MA: Springer.
8.
Crosby, B. ( 1992) Stakeholder Analysis: A Vital Tool for Strategic Managers . Washington, DC: USAID.
9.
Currie, R.R., S. Seaton and F. Wesley (2009) ‘Determining Stakeholders for Feasibility Analysis’, Annals of Tourism Research36: 41-63.
Gardner, D.E. ( 1977) ‘Five Evaluation Frameworks: Implications for Decision Making in Higher Education’, Journal of Higher Education48: 571-93.
12.
Hansen, H.F. ( 2005) ‘Choosing Evaluation Models: A Discussion on Evaluation Design’, Evaluation11: 447-62.
13.
Hogwood, B.A.L.G. ( 1984) Policy Analysis for Real World. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
14.
Honadle, G. and L. Cooper ( 1989) ‘Beyond Coordination and Control: An Interorganizational Approach to Structural Adjustment, Service Delivery, and Natural Resource Management’, World Development17: 1531-41.
15.
Hood, C. ( 1991) ‘A Public Management for All Seasons?’, Public Administration69: 3-19.
16.
Hood, C. ( 1994) ‘Policy Reversals and How to Explain Them’ , in Hood (ed.) Explaining Economic Policy Reversals, pp. 1-18. Buckingham: Open University Press.
17.
Julian, D.A., A. Jones and D. Devo ( 1995) ‘Open Systems Evaluation and the Logic Model: Program Planning and Evaluation Tools’, Evaluation and Program Planning18: 333-41.
18.
Kelvin, A. ( 2000) ‘How Stakeholders with Various Preferences Converge on Acceptable Investment Programs’, Evaluation and Program Planning23: 105-13.
19.
Kickert, W.J.M., E.-H. Klijn and J.F.M. Koppenjan ( 1997) Managing Complex Networks. London : Sage.
20.
Kingdon, J. ( 1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
21.
Kovács, A. ( 2004) Enhancing Procurement Practices: Comprehensive Approach to Acquiring Complex Facilities and Projects. Norwell, MA: Springer.
22.
Lane, J.-E. ( 1997) Public Sector Reform in the Nordic Countries’, in Lane (ed.) Public Sector Reform: Rationale, Trends and Problems, pp. 188-208. London: Sage.
23.
Laurence, J. and J. O’Toole ( 2000) ‘Research on Policy Implementation: Assessment and Prospects’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10: 263-88.
24.
Lindenberg, M. and B. Crosby ( 1981) Managing Development: The Political Dimension. Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
25.
Martin, S. and I. Sanderson ( 1999) ‘Evaluating Public Policy Experiments: Measuring Outcomes, Monitoring Processes or Managing Pilots?’, Evaluation5: 245-58.
26.
Mason, R.O. and I.I. Mitroff ( 1981) Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions: Theory, Cases, and Techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
27.
Matland, R.E. ( 1995) ‘Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory5(2): 145-74.
28.
Mohr, L.B. ( 1995) Impact Analysis for Program Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Molas-Gallart, J. and A. Davies ( 2006) ‘Toward Theory-Led Evaluation: The Experience of European Science, Technology, and Innovation Policies’, American Journal of Evaluation27: 64-82.
30.
Morgan, P. and S. Taschereau ( 1996) ‘Capacity and Institutional Assessment: Frameworks, Methods and Tools for Analysis’, prepared for CIDA Policy Branch, June 1996. Quebec: Canadian International Development Agency.
31.
Munck, I.M.E. ( 1997) ‘Bridging the Macro and Micro Levels in Outcome Evaluation’, Evaluation3: 320-44.
32.
National-E-Commerce-Report ( 2005) The National Report on E-Commerce in Iran 2004. Tehran: Ministry of Commerce, Islamic Republic of Iran .
33.
Pinto, R. and A.J. Mrope ( 1994) ‘Projectizing the Governance Approach to Civil Service Reform: An Institutional Environment Assessment for Preparing a Sectoral Adjustment Loan in the Gambia’. Africa Technical Department Series, Washington, DC: World Bank Discussion Papers.
34.
Pinto, R. and A.J. Mrope ( 1995) ‘Assessing Sector Institutions: Lessons of Experience from Zambia’s Education Sector’, discussion paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.
35.
Pollitt, C. ( 1993) Managerialism and the Public Services, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
36.
Prussia, G.E. and A.J. Kinicki ( 1996) ‘A Motivational Investigation of Group Effectiveness Using Social-Cognitive Theory’, Journal of Applied Psychology81: 187-98.
37.
Rametsteiner, E. and G. Weiss ( 2006a) ‘Assessing Policies from a Systems Perspective: Experiences with Applied Innovation Systems Analysis and Implications for Policy Evaluation’, Forest Policy and Economics8: 564-76.
38.
Rametsteiner, E. and G. Weiss ( 2006b) ‘The Evaluation of Forest Policies and Programmes’ , Forest Policy and Economics8: 564-76.
39.
Richards, D. ( 2002) ‘Public Policy in a Changing World’, Governance and Public Policy in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
Rossi, P.H., H. Freeman and M. Lipsey ( 1999) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. New York: Sage.
41.
Sanderson, I., A.G. Bovaird, P. Davis, S.J. Martin and A. Foreman ( 1998) Made to Measure: Evaluation in Practice in Local Government . London: Local Government Management Board.
42.
Scriven, M. ( 1981) Evaluation Thesaurus. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
Stefl, M.E. and S.L. Tucker ( 1994) ‘Applying Stakeholder Analysis to Health Care Administration Education’, Journal of Health Administration Education12: 119-44.
44.
Van der Meer, F.-B. and J. Edelenbos ( 2006) ‘Evaluation in Multi-Actor Policy Processes: Accountability, Learning and Co-operation’, Evaluation12: 201-18.
45.
Vedung, E. ( 1997) Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
46.
Virtanen, P. and P. Uuslkyla ( 2004) ‘Exploring the Missing Links between Cause and Effect: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Micro-Macro Conversions in Programme Evaluation’, Evaluation10: 77-91.
47.
Walt, G. ( 1994) Can Interest Groups Influence Government Policy?: Health Policy. An Introd uction to Process and Power. London : Zed Publications.
48.
Wegener, A. ( 1998) ‘Evaluating Competitively Tendered Contracts: Local Governments in Comparative Perspective’, Evaluation4: 189-203.
49.
Wigand, R. ( 1997) ‘Electronic Commerce: Definition, Theory, and Context’ , The Information Society13: 1-16.
50.
Wilson, C. ( 2000) ‘Policy Regimes and Policy Change’, Journal of Public Policy20: 247-74.
