The use of the constructivist paradigm to undertake so called `fourth generation evaluation' (FGE) has been promoted by its initial proponents (Guba and Lincoln) since the late 1980s. Despite this its use is still rarely favoured over the conventional positivist scientific approach.This paper explores the applicability of some of the main principles of FGE in relation to an evaluation undertaken by the authors.
Guba, E.G. and Y.S. Lincoln (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
2.
Huebner, A.J. and S.C. Betts (1999) `Examining Fourth Generation Evaluation: Application to Positive Youth Development', Evaluation5(3): 340—58.
3.
McCoy, M. and O.D.W. Hargie (2001) `Evaluating Evaluation: Implications for Assessing Quality', International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance14(7): 317—27.
4.
Papadopoulos, I. and M. Lay (2004) Evaluation of the `Play and Information' Project at the Albion Health Centre Child Health Clinic. London : Middlesex University.
5.
Papadopoulos, I. and S. Lees (2002) `Developing Culturally Competent Researchers', Journal of Advanced Nursing3: 258—64.
6.
Patton, M.Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
Pike Hall, S. (1995) Exploring Authenticity Criteria of Fourth Generation Evaluation. Available at: http://www.educ.drake.edu/hall/Naturalisticevalstuff/4thGenEvalAuthentic.htm (accessed March 2006).
8.
Pollitt, C. (n.d.) Stunted by Stakeholders? Limits to Collaborative Evaluation . Available at: http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/poli/pac/papers/pollitt.htm (accessed November 2006).
9.
Rossi, P.H., M.W. Lipsey and H.E. Freeman (1999) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, 6th edn. Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
Sure Start Unit (July 2002) A Guide to Planning and Running your Programme Round 6 Wave Guidance: Evaluation . Available at: http://www.surestart.gov.uk/_doc/P0000109.doc (8 February 2006).
