Abstract
The Ethical Challenges scenario in the June 2004 issue of the American Journal of Evaluation focused on an evaluator-client disagreement concerning the wisdom of having consumer representation on a steering committee that would help plan and oversee an evaluation in an agency providing community-based residential services to the chronically mentally ill. In her response to the commentaries on this case, Gillian Kerr encourages us to explore in greater depth the implications of using steering committees, advisory groups, and related strategies for soliciting stakeholder input in evaluation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.