This paper explores how various ideological positions or ‘cosmoses’ associated with physical literacy (PL) have come to be and, in doing so, extends scholarship by examining and presenting PL as a multiplicity of physical literacies. Drawing on Stengers’ notion of ‘cosmopolitics’ and Venturini's ‘cartography of controversies’ method, 167 scholarly articles and 23 non-scholarly texts were analysed to observe and describe how PL has been framed over time as a result of dynamic political factors. Findings reveal that three ‘waves’ of PL cosmoses have unfolded over time (PL as health-promoting physical activity, PL as motor competence and PL as phenomenological embodiment). Whilst all three seek to promote engagement in physical activity and have loose ties to ‘health’, each PL cosmos is bound by different objectives, actors and obligations and is orientated towards solving a different problem. Rather than continued confusion and controversy, we propose that PL be understood as a multiverse wherein the three different PL cosmoses are held apart as physical literacies that play co-existing roles based on the problem that each cosmos is trying to solve. While understanding PL as a multiverse is not a solution to the controversy and uncertainty surrounding PL, it provides those who are interested in or tasked with enacting PL an opportunity to become aware of and understand what the different PL cosmoses or physical literacies constitute and thus make possible (or not) on the basis of their ontological differences.
BalyiIWayRCardinalC, et al. (2005) Canadian Sport for Life. Long-term athlete development. Available at: https://sportforlife.ca(accessed 20 March 2022).
6.
BarnettLStoddenDCohenKE, et al. (2016) Fundamental movement skills: An important focus. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education35(3): 219–225.
7.
BrownTWhittleR (2021) Physical literacy: A sixth proposition in the Australian/Victorian curriculum: Health and physical education?Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education12(2): 180–196.
8.
CairneyJClarkHJJamesME, et al. (2018) The preschool physical literacy assessment tool: Testing a new physical literacy tool for the early years. Frontiers in Pediatrics6(138): 1–9.
9.
CairneyJDudleyDKwanM, et al. (2019a) Physical literacy, physical activity and health: Toward an evidence-informed conceptual model. Sports Medicine49(3): 371–383.
10.
CairneyJKiezTRoetertEP, et al. (2019b) A 20th-century narrative on the origins of the physical literacy construct. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education38(2): 79–83.
11.
CallonM (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In LawJ (ed), Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge?London: Routledge and Kegan Paul,196–229.
12.
CallonM (1998) An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology. The Sociological Review46(1): 244–269.
13.
CallonMLatourB (1981) Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: Knorr-CetinaKDCicourelAV (eds) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 277–303.
DudleyDCairneyJWainwrightN, et al. (2017) Critical considerations for physical literacy policy in public health, recreation, sport, and education agencies. Quest (Grand Rapids, Mich)69(4): 436–452.
16.
Durden-MyersEJWhiteheadMEPotN (2018) Physical literacy and human flourishing. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education37(3): 308–311.
17.
EdwardsLBryantAKeeganR, et al. (2017) Definitions, foundations and associations of physical literacy: A systematic review. Sports Medicine47(1): 113–126.
18.
GardMWrightJ (2001) Managing uncertainty: Obesity discourses and physical education in a risk society. Studies in Philosophy and Education20(6): 535–549.
HastiePAWallheadTL (2015) Operationalizing physical literacy through sport education. Journal of Sport and Health Science4(2): 132–138.
22.
HaubenstrickerJSeefeldtV (1986) Acquisition of motor skills during childhood. In SeefeldtV (ed), Physical Activity and Well-Being. Virginia: American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 41–92.
23.
Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group (2013) Canadian assessment of physical literacy. Manual for test administration. Available at: https://www.capl-eclp.ca(accessed 20 March 2022).
24.
HiggsC (2010) Physical literacy - Two approaches, one concept. Physical and Health Education Journal76(1): 6–7.
HollerPJaunigJAmortFM, et al. (2019). Holistic physical exercise training improves physical literacy among physically inactive adults: A pilot intervention study. BMC Public Health 19(1): 1–14.
28.
JohnsonAMcKennaHALévesqueL (2016) Physical literacy: Breaking down silos between sectors. Physical and Health Education Journal82(1): 1–17.
29.
JurbalaP (2015) What is physical literacy, really?Quest (Grand Rapids, Mich)67(4): 367–383.
KriellaarsDJCairneyJBortoletoMC, et al. (2019) The impact of circus arts instruction in physical education on the physical literacy of children in grades 4 and 5. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education38(2): 162–170.
McCloyCH (1957a). Towards a greater degree of physical literacy (part I). The Physical Educator14(1): 83–85.
42.
McCloyCH (1957b). Towards a greater degree of physical literacy (part II). The Physical Educator14(1): 126–130.
43.
McCuaigLQuennerstedtMMacdonaldD (2013) A salutogenic, strengths-based approach as a theory to guide HPE curriculum change. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education4(2): 109–125.
44.
Merleau-PontyM (1962) Phenomenology of Perception, Translated by Colin Smith. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
45.
MolA (1999) Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review47(1_suppl): 74–89.
46.
MolA (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
47.
MorisonR (1969) A Movement Approach to Educational Gymnastics. Michigan: J. M. Dent and Sons.
O’ConnorJAlfreyLPayneP (2012) Beyond games and sports: A socio-ecological approach to physical education. Sport, Education and Society17(3): 365–380.
50.
PenneyD (2006) Curriculum construction and change. In KirkDMacdonaldDO’SullivanM (eds), Handbook of Physical Education. London: Sage, 565–579.
51.
QuennerstedtMMcCuaigLMårdhA (2020) The fantasmatic logics of physical literacy. Sport, Education and Society26(8): 846–861.
52.
RobinsonDBRandallLBarrettJ (2018) Physical literacy (mis)understandings: What do leading physical education teachers know about physical literacy?Journal of Teaching in Physical Education37(3): 288–298.
53.
RogersJE (1929) Education through physical education. Pennsylvania School Journal78(1): 12.
54.
RogersJE (1930) Why physical education?Journal of Education112(15): 367–368.
55.
SartreJP (1957) Being and Nothingness, Translated by Hazel Barnes. London: Methuen.
SumKWRChengCFWallheadT, et al. (2018) Perceived physical literacy instrument for adolescents: A further validation of PPLI. Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness16(1): 26–31.
66.
ThorburnMStolzSA (2017) Embodied learning and school-based physical culture: Implications for professionalism and practice in physical education. Sport, Education and Society22(6): 721–731.
67.
TinningRKirkD (1991) Daily Physical Education: Collected Papers on Health-Based Physical Education in Australia. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.
68.
TremblayMSCostas-BradstreetCBarnesJD, et al. (2018) Canada’s physical literacy consensus statement: Process and outcome. BMC Public Health18(Suppl_2): 1–18.
69.
VenturiniT (2010) Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science19(3): 258–273.
70.
VenturiniT (2012) Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science21(7): 796–812.
71.
VenturiniTRicciDMauriM, et al. (2015) Designing controversies and their publics. Design Issues, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press31(3): 74–87.
72.
VuoriI (2018) World Health Organization and physical activity. Progress in Preventive Medicine3(1): 1–7.
73.
WayRBalyiITronoC, et al. (2014) Canadian Sport for Life—Long-Term Athlete Development Resource Paper 2.0. Vancouver: Canadian Sport Institute—Pacific.
74.
Welsh Government (2019) Draft curriculum for Wales 2022: Draft statutory guidance area of learning and experience health and well-being. Available at: https://hwb.gov.wales/curriculum-for-wales(accessed 20 March 2022).
75.
WhiteheadM (2001) The concept of physical literacy. European Journal of Physical Education6(2): 127–138.
76.
WhiteheadM (2007) Physical literacy: Philosophical considerations in relation to developing a sense of self, universality and propositional knowledge. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy1(3): 281–298.
77.
WhiteheadM (2010) Physical Literacy Throughout the Lifecourse. London: Routledge.
78.
WhiteheadM (2013a) Definition of physical literacy and clarification of related issue. ICSSPE Bulletin Journal of Sport Science and Physical Education65(1): 28–33.
79.
WhiteheadM (2013b) The history and development of physical literacy. ICSSPE Bulletin–Journal of Sport Science and Physical Education65(1): 21–27.
80.
WhiteheadM (2019) Physical Literacy Across the World. London: Routledge.
YoungLO’ConnorJAlfreyL (2019) Physical literacy: A concept analysis. Sport, Education and Society25(8): 946–959.
83.
YoungLO’ConnorJAlfreyL, et al. (2020) Assessing physical literacy in health and physical education. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education12(2): 156–179.
84.
YoungLO’ConnorJAlfreyL (2021a) Mapping the physical literacy controversy: An analysis of key actors within scholarly literature. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy1–17
85.
YoungLO’ConnorJAlfreyL (2021b) When teachers Google physical literacy: A cartography of controversies analysis. European Physical Education Review1–20.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
