The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between implicit theories of ability and competence perceptions to changes in approach-avoidance goal adoption in two specific activities in the curriculum. Four hundred and thirty pupils, aged 11–15 years, completed measures of approach-avoidance goals, perceived competence and implicit theories of ability at the start and end of a tennis or cricket unit of work in physical education (PE). In both tennis and cricket, most of the variance in the variables under investigation was due to differences between pupils and not to differences between classes. Controlling for prior approach-avoidance goal adoption, incremental beliefs predicted change in mastery-approach goal adoption and perceptions of competence predicted change in performance-approach goal adoption over the unit of work in both tennis and cricket. Differences in the predictive pattern of antecedents to changes in goal adoption emerged between activities.
AmesCA (1984) Competitive, cooperative and individualistic goal structures: A motivational analysis. In: AmesREAmesCA (eds) Research on Motivation in Education, Volume 1. New York: Academic Press, pp.177–207.
2.
BiddleSJH (2001). Enhancing motivation in physical education. In: RobertsGC (ed) Advances in Motivation in Sport and Exercise. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics, pp.101–127.
3.
BiddleSJHWangCKJChatzisarantisNLD (2003a) Motivation for physical activity in young people: Entity and incremental beliefs about athletic ability. Journal of Sports Sciences21(12): 973–989.
4.
BiddleSJHWangCKJKavussanuM (2003b). Correlates of achievement goal orientations in physical activity: A systematic review of research. European Journal of Sport Science3(5): 1–20.
ConroyDEElliotAJHoferSM (2003) A 2×2 achievement goals questionnaire for sport: Evidence for factorial invariance, temporal stability, and external validity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology25(4): 456–476.
7.
ConroyDEKayeMPCoatsworthJD (2006) Coaching climates and the destructive effects of mastery-avoidance achievement goals on situational motivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology28(1): 69–92.
8.
CuryFDa FonsecaDRufoM (2002) Perceptions of competence, implicit theory of ability, perception of motivational climate, and achievement goals: A test of the trichotomous conceptualization of endorsement of achievement motivation in the physical education setting. Perceptual and Motor Skills95: 233–244.
9.
CuryFElliotAJDa FonsecaD (2006) The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90(4): 666–679.
DweckCS (1986) Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist41(10): 1040–1048.
12.
DweckCS (1990) Self-theories and goals: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. In: DienstbierR (ed) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1990. Perspectives on Motivation, Volume 38. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp.199–235.
13.
DweckCS (1999) Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
14.
DweckCSElliottES (1983) Achievement motivation. In: HetheringtonEM (ed) Handbook of Child Psychology: Socialization, Personality and Social Development, Volume 4. New York: John Wiley, pp.643–691.
15.
ElliotAJ (1997) Integrating the ‘classic’ and ‘contemporary’ approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In: MaehrMLPintrichPR (eds) Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Volume 10. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp.143–179.
16.
ElliotAJ (1999) Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist34(3): 169–189.
17.
ElliotAJ (2005) A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In: ElliotAJDweckCS (eds) Handbook of Competence and Motivation. New York: Guildford Press, pp.52–72.
18.
ElliotAJChurchMA (1997) A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72(1): 218–232.
19.
ElliotAJMcGregorHA (2001) A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology80(3): 501–519.
20.
ElliotAJThrashTM (2001) Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review13(2): 139–156.
21.
GoudasMBiddleSFoxK (1994) Perceived locus of causality, goal orientations, and perceived competence in school physical education classes. British Journal of Educational Psychology64: 453–463.
22.
HaggerMSChatzisarantisNLDCulverhouseT (2003) The processes by which perceived autonomy support in physical education promotes leisure-time physical activity intentions and behavior: A trans-contextual model. Journal of Educational Psychology95(4): 784–795.
23.
HarwoodCSprayCMKeeganR (2008) Achievement goal theories in sport. In: HornTS (ed) Advances in Sport Psychology, 3rd edition. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics, pp.157–185
24.
HoxJJ (2002) Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
MarshHWPapaioannouATheodorakisY (2006) Causal ordering of physical self-concept and exercise behavior: Reciprocal effects model and the influence of physical education teachers. Health Psychology25(3): 316–328.
26.
MiddletonMJMidgleyC (1997) Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology89(4): 710–718.
27.
NichollsJG (1984) Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review91: 328–346.
28.
NichollsJG (1989) The Competitive Ethos and Democratic Education. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
29.
OmmundsenY (2001a) Pupils’ affective responses in physical education classes: The association of implicit theories of the nature of ability and achievement goals. European Physical Education Review7(3): 219–242.
30.
OmmundsenY (2001b) Self-handicapping strategies in physical education classes: The influence of implicit theories of the nature of ability and achievement goal orientations. Psychology of Sport and Exercise2(3): 139–156.
31.
OmmundsenY (2004) Self-handicapping related to task and performance-approach and avoidance goals in physical education. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology16(2): 183–197.
32.
OmmundsenY (2006) Pupils’ self-regulation in physical education: The role of motivational climates and differential achievement goals. European Physical Education Review12(3): 289–315.
33.
Qualification and Curriculum Authority (QCA) (2007) The National Curriculum: Statutory Requirements for Key Stage 3 and 4. London: QCA.
34.
RasbashJSteeleFBrowneW (2005) A User’s Guide to MLwiN Version 2.0. Bristol: University of Bristol.
35.
SprayCMWarburtonVE (2003) Ability beliefs, achievement goals and motivation in physical education classes. In: StelterR (ed) New Approaches to Exercise and Sport Psychology: Theories, Methods and Applications. Proceedings of the 11th European Congress of Sport Psychology. Copenhagen, Denmark: FEPSAC, p. 160.
36.
SprayCMWarburtonVE (2011) Temporal relations among multidimensional perceptions of competence and trichotomous achievement goals in physical education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise12(5): 515–524.
37.
WangCKJBiddleSJHElliotAJ (2007) The 2×2 achievement goal framework in a physical education context. Psychology of Sport and Exercise8(2): 147–168.
38.
WarburtonVESprayCM (2008) Motivation in physical education across the primary-secondary school transition. European Physical Education Review14(2): 157–178.
39.
WarburtonVESprayCM (2009) Antecedents of approach-avoidance achievement goal adoption in physical education: A longitudinal perspective. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education28(2): 214–232.
