Operating room waste management: A case study of primary hip operations at a leading National Health Service hospital in the United Kingdom

Abstract

Objective

This research examines current waste management within an operating room at a large United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) hospital. The study measured the volume and type of waste produced for primary hip operations (PHOs) and estimated the total waste produced across the United Kingdom by the procedure.

Methods

Three PHOs were audited to measure and compare the waste volumes generated.

Results

The average volume of waste per surgical procedure was 10.9 kg, consisting of clinical (84.4%), recyclable (12.8%) and bio-bin (2.8%) waste. This research also found that single-use devices contribute significantly to operating room waste. In addition, it was estimated that there is a missed opportunity to reduce clinical waste volume in each procedure, where approximately 15% of clinical waste disposal consisted of visibly clean recyclable waste material, including cardboard and plastics.

Conclusions

It was estimated that in the NHS approximately 1043 tonnes of waste is produced annually by PHOs alone. A significant volume of this waste could be prevented through improved recycling and reduced use of single-use devices.

Keywords

waste management operating room sustainability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

MacNeill

Lillywhite

Brown

. The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems. Lancet Planet Health 2017; 1: e381–e388.

IPCC . Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Masson-Delmotte

Zhai

Pirani

, et al. (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, In Press.

IPCC . Summary for Policymakers. In: Masson-Delmotte

Zhai

Pörtner

H-O

, et al. (eds) Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, World Meteorological Organization, 2018, p. 32.

Tennison

Roschnik

Ashby

, et al. Health care’s response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England. Lancet Planet Health 2021; 5: e84–e92.

NHS Digital . Estates Return Information Collection (ERIC) 2018/19. Data Quality Report 2019. NHS Digital, October 2019. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/estates-returns-information-collection/england-2018-19

National Health Service . Delivering a ‘Net Zero’ National Health Service. UK: NHS England, February 2021.

Minogue

Wells

. Reducing waste in the NHS: an overview of the literature and challenges for the nursing profession. Nurs Manage 2016; 23: 20–25.

Voudrias

. Healthcare waste management from the point of view of circular economy. Waste Manag 2018; 75: 1–2.

Eckelman

Sherman

. Environmental impacts of the U.S. Health care system and effects on public health. PloS One 2016; 11: e0157014.

10.

Shrank

Rogstad

Parekh

. Waste in the US health care system. JAMA 2019; 322: 1501–1509.

11.

Roa

Velin

Tudravu

, et al. Climate change: challenges and opportunities to scale up surgical, obstetric, and anaesthesia care globally. Lancet Planet Health 2020; 4: e538–e543.

12.

National Health Service . NHS Long Term Plan. UK: Report. NHS, January 2019.

13.

Kwakye

Brat

Makary

. Green surgical practices for health care. Arch Surg 2011; 146: 131–136.

14.

National Statistics . Hospital Admitted Patient Care Activity. UK: Report. Health and Social Care Information Centre, November 2016.

15.

Shrime

Daniels

Meara

. Half a billion surgical cases: aligning surgical delivery with best-performing health systems. Surgery 2015; 158: 27–32.

16.

Rizan

Steinbach

Nicholson

, et al. The carbon footprint of surgical operations: a systematic review. Ann Surgery 2021; 272: 986–995.

17.

National Joint Registry . 17th Annual Report 2020. Surgical data to 31 December 2019. Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man, 2020, https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/2019 (accessed 10 August 2021).

18.

Patel

Pavlou

Mújica-Mota

, et al. The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B: 1076–1081.

19.

Southorn

Norrish

Gardner

, et al. Reducing the carbon footprint of the operating theatre: a multicentre quality improvement report. J Perioper Pract 2013; 23: 144–146.

20.

Rizan

Mortimer

Stancliffe

, et al. Plastics in healthcare: time for a re-evaluation. J R Soc Med 2020; 113: 49–53.

21.

Stall

Kagoma

Bondy

, et al. Surgical waste audit of 5 total knee arthroplasties. Can J Surg 2013; 56: 97–102.

22.

Lee

Mears

. Reducing and recycling in joint arthroplasty. The J Arthroplasty 2012; 27: 1757–1760.

23.

Burnett

RSJ

Abos

. Total hip arthroplasty: techniques and results. BC Med J 2010; 52: e64.

24.

United Nations . Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 3: Ensure Healthy Lives and Promote Wellbeing for All at All Ages, https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/health/(2021, accessed 10 August 2021).

25.

Royal College of Surgeons of England . Sustainability in Surgery Strategy 2021. UK: RCSE, April 2021.

26.

Rizan

Bhutta

Reed

, et al. The carbon footprint of waste streams in a UK hospital. J Clean Prod 2021; 286: 125446.

27.

McGain

Story

Lim

, et al. Financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use anaesthetic equipment. Br J Anaesth 2017; 118: 862–869.

28.

Thiel

Eckelman

Guido

, et al. Environmental impacts of surgical procedures: life cycle assessment of hysterectomy in the United States. Environ Sci Techn 2015; 49: 1779–1786.

29.

Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland . Consensus Statement on Cost-Effective and Sustainable Surgery, https://www.asgbi.org.uk/userfiles/file/consensus/asgbi_consensus_statement_on_cost-effective_surgery.pdf (2012, cited February 2022).

30.

Sherman

Raibley

Eckelman

. Life cycle assessment and costing methods for device procurement. Anesth Analgesia 2018; 127: 434–443.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.31 MB