Relationship between preoperative patient-reported outcomes and hospital length of stay: a prospective cohort study of general surgery patients in Vancouver,Canada

Abstract

Objectives

As an aging population drives more demand for elective inpatient surgery, one approach to reducing length of stay is enhanced evaluation of patients’ preoperative health status. The objective of this research was to determine whether patient-reported outcome measures collected preoperatively can identify patients at risk for longer lengths of stay.

Methods

This study was based on a prospectively recruited cohort of patients who were scheduled for elective inpatient general surgery in Vancouver, Canada. All participants completed a number of patient-reported outcome measures preoperatively, including the EQ-5D for general health status, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for depression, and the pain intensity (P), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and interference with general activity (G), known as the PEG, for pain. Patient-reported outcome data were linked to hospital discharge summaries. Multivariate regression was performed to estimate risk of longer lengths of stay, adjusting for patient and clinical characteristics. The primary outcome was length of stay and its associated cost. Data collection took place between October 2012 and November 2016.

Results

Participation among the population of 2307 eligible patients was 50.5%, providing 1165 participants. Preoperative patient-reported outcomes were not concordant with hospital reported diagnoses of depression or pain. Patients’ preoperative depression and pain scores were independently positively associated with longer length of stay after adjusting for patient-level characteristics. Patients whose PHQ-9 score was 10, representing clinically significant depression, were estimated to have a 1.53 day longer hospitalization, which was associated with an estimated incremental hospital cost of $1667.

Conclusions

Preoperative self-reported assessment of depression and pain can assist with identifying patients at higher risk of longer lengths of stay. Patient’s self-reported preoperative measures of depression and pain should be incorporated into patient pathways. They provide opportunities for improving management of general surgery patients and possibly play a role in aligning hospital funding with patients’ needs.

Keywords

depression length of stay pain patient-reported outcomes quality of life

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hodge

Horsley

Albiani

et al . The consequences of waiting for cataract surgery: a systematic review. CMAJ 2007; 176: 1285–1290.

Carr

Teucher

Mann

et al . Waiting for surgery from the patient perspective. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2009; 2: 107–119.

Makary

Segev

Pronovost

et al . Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210: 901–908.

Dasgupta

Rolfson

Stolee

et al . Frailty is associated with postoperative complications in older adults with medical problems. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009; 48: 78–83.

Min

Hall

Finlayson

et al . Estimating risk of postsurgical general and geriatric complications using the VESPA preoperative tool. JAMA Surg 2017; 152: 1126–1133.

Robinson

Stiegmann

et al . Frailty predicts increased hospital and six-month healthcare cost following colorectal surgery in older adults. Am J Surg 2011; 202: 511–514.

Fagard

Leonard

Deschodt

et al . The impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes in individuals aged 65 and over undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol 2016; 7: 479–491.

Gutacker

Bojke

Daidone

et al . Truly inefficient of providing better quality of care? Analysing the relationship between risk-adjusted hospital costs and patients’ health outcomes. Health Econ 2013; 22: 931–947.

Neumann

Cohen

Weinstein

MC.

Updating cost-effectiveness – the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 796–797.

10.

Garber

AM.

Advances in cost-effectiveness analysis of health interventions. In: Newhouse

Culyer

(eds) Handbook of health economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000, pp.181–221.

11.

Basch

Patient-reported outcomes – harnessing patients’ voices to improve clinical care. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 105–108.

12.

Steinwachs

DM.

Application of health status assessment measures in policy research. Med Care 1989; 27: S12–S26.

13.

Deyo

Patrick

DL.

Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy research. Med Care 1989; 27: S254–S263.

14.

EuroQo L Group. EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16: 199–208.

15.

Brooks

EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37: 53–72.

16.

Johnson

Pickard

Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 health surveys in a general population survey in Alberta, Canada. Med Care 2000; 38: 115–121.

17.

Bansback

Tsuchiya

Brazier

et al . Canadian valuation of EQ-5D health states: preliminary value set and considerations for future valuation studies. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e3111.

18.

Kroenke

Spitzer

Williams

The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16: 606–613.

19.

Kerper

Spies

Buspavanich

et al . Preoperative depression and hospital length of stay in surgical patients. Minerva Anestesiol 2014; 80: 984–991.

20.

Spitzer

Kroenke

Williams

et al . Patient Health Questionnaire Study Group. Validity and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. JAMA 1999; 282: 1737–1744.

21.

Krebs

Lorenz

Bair

et al . Development and initial validation of the PEG, a three-item scale assessing pain intensity and interference. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24: 733–738.

22.

Krebs

Bair

Damush

et al . Comparative responsiveness of pain outcome measures among primary care patients with musculoskeletal pain. Med Care 2010; 48: 1007–1014.

23.

Miller

Combs

van Puymbroeck

et al . Fatigue and pain: relationships with physical performance and patient beliefs after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2013; 20: 347–355.

24.

Canadian Institute for Health Information. DAD resource intensity weights and expected length of stay for CMG+ 2012. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2012.

25.

Canadian Institute for Health Information. The cost of hospital stays: Why costs vary. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2008.

26.

Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). CMG+ directory 2011. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2011.

27.

Kind

Dolan

Gudex

et al . Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ 1998; 316: 736–741.

28.

Kroenke

Spitzer

Williams

et al . The Patient Health Questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2010; 32: 345–359.

29.

Wodchis

Bushmeneva

Nikitovic

et al.

Guidelines on person-level costing using administrative databases in Ontario. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto, 2013.

30.

Lægreid

Neby

Gaming, accountability and trust: DRGs and activity-based funding in Norway. Financ Account Manag 2016; 32: 57–79.

31.

Canadian Institute for Health Information. Patient cost estimator methodological notes and glossary. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2013.

32.

Goldfield

The evolution of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs): from its beginnings in case-mix and resource use theory, to its implementation for payment and now for its current utilization for quality within and outside the hospital. Qual Manag Health Care 2010; 19: 3–16.

33.

Kocher

Ayanian

JZ.

Flipping the script – a patient-centered approach to fixing acute care. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 915–917.

34.

Kassler

Tomoyasu

Conway

PH.

Beyond a traditional payer – CMS’s role in improving population health. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 109–111.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB