There has been increasing reliance on policy directives as instruments for shaping clinical practice in health care, despite it being widely recognized that there is a significant translation gap between clinical policy and its implementation. Self-Determination Theory, a widely researched and empirically validated theory of human needs’ fulfilment and motivation, offers a potentially valuable theoretical framework for understanding not only why the current policy environment has not led to the anticipated improvement in the quality and safety of clinical care but, importantly, also provides guidance about how organizations can create an environment that can nurture behavioural change in the workforce. We describe an alternative approach to clinical policy-making underpinned by Self-Determination Theory, which we believe has broad application for the science of clinical implementation theory.
O’ConnorNKotzeBVineR. The emperor’s edicts stop at the village gate. Aust Psychiatry2012; 20: 28–34.
2.
NilsenPStahlCRobackK. Never the twain shall meet? A comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research. Implement Sci2013; 8: 63–63.
3.
NilsenP. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci2015; 10: 53–53.
4.
EcclesMGrimshawJWalkerA. Changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol2005; 58: 107–112.
5.
GouldingLParkeHMaharajR. Improving clinical care discharge summaries: a collaborative quality improvement project using PDSA. BMJ Qual Improvem Rep2015; 10: 1136–1136.
6.
RyanRPatrickHDeciE. Facilitating health behaviour change and its maintenance: interventions based on Self-Determination Theory. Eur Health Psychol2008; 10: 1–1.
7.
LynchMPlantRRyanR. Psychological needs and threat to safety: implications for staff and patients in a psychiatric hospital for youth. Prof Psychol Res Pract2005; 36: 4–4.
8.
WilliamsVDeaneFOadesL. A cluster-randomised controlled trial of values-based training to promote autonomously held recovery values in mental health workers. Implement Sci2016; 11: 13–13.
9.
ManleyKSandersKCardiffS. Effective workplace culture: the attributes, enabling factors and consequences of a new concept. Int Pract Dev J2011; 1: 1–29.
10.
BhugraD. Demoralisation, deprofessionalisation, denial and detachment in medicine?Aust N Z J Psychiatry2013; 47: 1104–1107.
11.
BallattJCamplingP. Intelligent kindness: reforming the culture of healthcare, London: RCPsych Publications, 2011.
12.
MannionR. Enabling compassionate healthcare: perils, prospects and perspectives. Int J Health Policy Manag2014; 2: 115–117.
13.
DaviesHMannionR. Will prescriptions for cultural change improve the NHS?BMJ2013; 346: f1305–f1305.
14.
DaviesHNutleySMannionR. Organisational culture and quality of health care. BMJ Qual Safety2000; 9: 111–119.
15.
National Advisory Group on the Safety of Patients in England. A promise to learn – a commitment to act: improving the safety of patient in England, London: Department of Health, 2013.
16.
RyanRDeciEOverview of self-determination theory: an orgasmic dialecticalperspective. In: DeciERyanR (eds). Handbook of self-determination research, Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2002, pp. 3–33.
17.
StoneDDeciERyanR. Beyond talk: creating autonomous motivation through self-determination theory. J Gen Manag2009; 34: 75–91.
18.
GagnéMDeciE. Self-determination theory and work motivation. J Organiz Behav2005; 26: 331–362.
19.
WestMEckertRStewardK. Developing collective leadership for health care, London: The King’s Fund, 2014.
20.
WestMDawsonJ. Employee engagement and NHS performance, London: The King’s Fund, 2012.
21.
MollerARyanRDeciE. Self-determination theory and public policy: improving the quality of consumer decisions without using coercion. J Publ Pol Market2006; 25: 104–116.
22.
HamC. Improving the performance of health services: the role of clinical leadership. Lancet2003; 361: 1976–1980.
23.
GagnéMPanaccioAThe motivational power of job design. In: GagnéM (ed). Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 165–180.
24.
MaunoSKinnunenURuokolainenM. Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: a longitudinal study. J Vocat Behav2007; 70: 149–171.
25.
BakkerABalP. Weekly work engagement and performance: a study among starting teachers. J Occupat Organis Psychol2010; 83: 189–206.
26.
McKeeLCharlesKDixon-WoodsM. ‘New’ and distributed leadership and safety in health care, or ‘old’ and hierarchical? An interview study with strategic stakeholders. J Health Serv Res2013; 18(Suppl. 2): 11–19.
27.
LangleyADenisJ. Beyond evidence: the micropolitics of improvement. BMJ Qual Saf2011; 20(Suppl. 1): i43–i46.
28.
MinasH. Leadership for change in complex systems. Aust Psychiatry2005; 13: 33–39.
29.
NielsenKRandallR. The importance of employee participation and perceptions of change in procedures in a teamworking intervention. Work Stress2012; 26: 91–111.
