Use of the h-index to measure the quality of the output of health services researchers

Abstract

Objective:

To assess the use of the h-index to measure the quality of the output of health services researchers.

Method:

Online survey, with bibliometric analysis of a convenience volunteer sample of researchers mainly in the UK, North America and Australasia. Self-reported from Google Scholar: h-index; number of papers; number of citations; number of papers with ≥10 citations.

Results:

There were complete responses from 532 health services researchers of whom 371 (70%) were from the UK. Of the bibliometric measures, the h-index appeared to be the best discriminator between other measures of quality (e.g. seniority; entry into the last UK Research Assessment Exercise). The median h-index was 12, with 90th and 95th quantiles of 40 and 52, respectively. Statisticians had the highest h-index with qualitative researchers the lowest (median 16 and 7, respectively). The h-index was predicted to increase by approximately 1 point annually with the biggest increase in statisticians and smallest in qualitative researchers when estimated by quantile regression.

Conclusions:

The h-index is a useful summary measure of output and quality of health services researchers. However, any accurate interpretation of bibliometric measures needs to take into account a person’s research discipline.

Keywords

h-index research quality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Research Excellence Framework 2014, http://www.ref.ac.uk/ (accessed 25 July 2013).

Hirsch

. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2005; 102: 16569–16572.

Patel

Ashrafian

Bornmann

. Enhancing the h index for the objective assessment of healthcare researcher performance and impact. J R Soc Med 2013; 106: 19–29.

Harzing

. The publish or perish book: your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis, Melbourne, Australia: Tamar Software Research Pty Ltd, 2011.

Streiner

Norman

. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Glanville

Kendrick

McNally

. Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States: bibliometric analysis. BMJ 2011; 342: d1028–d1028.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB