Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The expectation, from the ethos of medicine and society, is that a practitioner should make the correct ethical decision in the clinical setting. Yet there is little help for them as to a process for making ethical decisions. A structured six-step framework may assist. It is not an algorithm to arrive at a determinate answer in all situations and ethical issues but instead offers a process that indicates the most relevant information and biomedical considerations a practitioner needs to be aware of and helps to make ethics issues more manageable. The issues practitioners face are complex and resistant to reduction; it is hubris to pretend otherwise. Yet, the difficulty of these issues warrants practitioners relying on a framework to guide them in the process of making ethical decisions.

Keywords

decision aids decision quality patient-centered care Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Copp

. The Oxford handbook of ethical theory, Oxford: Oxford University, 2006.

Schneed JB. The misfortunes of virtue. In: Virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, pp.178–200.

Aristotle. The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation, Barnes B (ed). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984 (NE 1.3 1094^b12–13).

Beauchamp

Childress

. Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Jonsen

Siegler

Winslade

. Clinical ethics: a practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine, 7th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical, 2010.

McCammon

Brody

. How virtue ethics informs medical professionalism. HEC Forum 2012; 24: 257–272.

Pellegrino

Thomasm

. The virtues in medical practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

Dubler

Liebman

. Bioethics mediation, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 2011.

Fox

Bottrell

Berkowitz

. Integrated Ethics: an innovative program to improve ethics quality in health care. Innovation J 2010; 15: 1–36.

10.

National Center for Ethics in Health Care. United States Department of Veteran Affairs. Integrated ethics, http://www.ethics.va.gov/integratedethics/ (2013, accessed April 2, 2013).

11.

Fox

. Evaluating ethics quality in health care organizations: looking back and looking forward. AJOB Primary Res 2013; 4: 71–77.

12.

Kenny N, Downie J and HarrisonC. Respectful involvement of children in medical decision making. In: Singer PA and Viens AM (eds) The Cambridge textbook of bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

13.

American Academy of Pediatrics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995; 93: 314–317.

14.

Canadian Paediatric Society and Bioethics Committee. Treatment decisions regarding infants, children, and adolescents. Paediatr Child Health 2004; 9: 99–103.

Six-step framework for ethical decision making

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References