Strategies to identify future shortages due to interruptions in the health care procurement supply chain and their impact on health services: a method from the English National Health Service

Abstract

Objectives

The uninterrupted supply of essential items for patient care is crucial for organizations that deliver health care. Many products central to health care are derived from natural resources such as oil and cotton, supplies of which are vulnerable to climate change and increasing global demand. The purpose of this study was to identify which items would have the greatest effect on service delivery and patient outcomes should they no longer be available.

Methods

Using a consensus development approach, all items bought by one hospital, over one year, were subjected to a filtering process. Criteria were developed to identify at-risk products and assess them against specific risks and opportunities. Seventy-two items were identified for assessment against a range of potential impacts on service delivery and patient outcomes, from no impact to significant impact. Clinical and non-clinical participants rated the items.

Results

In the category of significant impact, consensus was achieved for 20 items out of 72. There were differences of opinion between clinical and non-clinical participants in terms of significant impact in relation to 18 items, suggesting that priority over purchasing decisions may create areas of conflict. Reducing reliance on critically scarce resources and reducing demand were seen as the most important criteria in developing sustainable procurement.

Conclusion

The method was successful in identifying items vulnerable to supply chain interruption and should be repeated in other areas to test its ability to adapt to local priorities, and to assess how it functions in a variety of public and private settings.

Keywords

health care procurement supply chains

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Defra. Resource security action plan: making the most of valuable materials, www.defra.gov.uk (2012, accessed 30 August 2012).

European Commission. Critical raw materials for the EU. Report of the ad-hoc working group on defining critical raw materials, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/rawmaterials/documents/index_en.htm (2010, accessed 8 August 2012).

European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions tackling the challenges in commodity markets and on raw materials. Brussels: European Commission, 2011.

Maykut

Moorhouse

. Beginning qualitative research a philosophic and practical guide, London: Routledge Falmer, 2004, pp. 45–45.

Creswell

. Qualitative inquiry and research design, London: Sage Publications, 1998, pp. 119–119.

Hanlon

McCartney

. Peak oil: will it be public health’s greatest challenge? Public Health 2008; 122: 647–652.

European Commission. Directorate-General for Trade. EU trade policy for raw materials. Second activity report, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2012/may/tradoc_149515.pdf (2012, accessed 11 November 2012).

National Health Service Sustainable Development Unit (NHS SDU). Saving carbon improving health. NHS carbon reduction strategy for England, Cambridge: NHSSDU, 2009.

10.

Harland C, Rudd A, Knight L, et al. Procurement in the English NHS. In: Knight KL, Harland C, Telgen J, et al. (eds) Public Procurement: international cases and commentary. Oxford: Routledge, 2012, pp. 16–22.

11.

12.

Department of Health. Procuring for health and sustainability, 2012. Crown Copyright.

13.

Allen

Wade

Dickinson

. Bridging the divide – commercial procurement and supply chain management: are there lessons for health care commissioning in England? J Public Procurement 2009; 9: 79–108.