Effective policy mechanisms for an equitable geographical distribution of general practitioners: a qualitative comparative analysis of the accessibility of primary care in Europe
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2013
Effective policy mechanisms for an equitable geographical distribution of general practitioners: a qualitative comparative analysis of the accessibility of primary care in Europe
To explore the effectiveness of four different policy mechanisms in achieving a more equitable geographical distribution of general practitioners (GPs) in European countries. The following mechanisms were analysed: (1) interventions during medical training; (2) financial incentives; (3) quotas to allocate GPs to regions and (4) capitation-based remuneration.
Methods
A macro-comparative method, namely, fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis, was employed to explore the distributional effectiveness of the four mechanisms. A literature review yielded information on the use of these mechanisms in the 21 European countries included, while country-specific equity in the geographic GP distribution served as the outcome variable.
Results
Quotas determining the number of GPs per region proved to be highly effective in producing an equitable GP distribution if calculated based on health care needs. Remunerating GPs largely through capitation payments also proved to be an effective policy mechanism. Financial bonuses to GPs practising in under-served areas and interventions during medical training had little or no impact.
Conclusion
Several high income countries have a maldistribution of primary care physicians to the detriment of rural or socially deprived areas. Policy makers have instituted a variety of policies to counter this. This study helps to identify mechanisms which are likely to be more and less effective.
International Conference on Primary Health Care. Declaration of Alma Ata, Geneva: World Health Organization, 1978.
2.
WhiteheadM. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Health Promot Int1991; 6: 217–228.
3.
PenchanskyRThomasJW. The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med Care1981; 19: 127–140.
4.
OECD. Health at a glance 2009: OECD indicators, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2009.
5.
WHO. Increasing access to health workers in remote and rural areas through improved retention: global policy recommendations, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2010.
6.
RihouxB. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related systematic comparative methods: recent advances and remaining challenges for social science research. Int Sociol2006; 21: 679–706.
7.
SimoensSHurstJ. The supply of physician services in OECD countries, Paris: OECD, 2006.
8.
GroblerLMaraisBJMabundaSA. Interventions for increasing the proportion of health professionals practising in rural and other underserved areas. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2009; (1): CD005314–CD005314.
9.
WilsonNWCouperIDVriesE de. A critical review of interventions to redress the inequitable distribution of healthcare professionals to rural and remote areas. Rural Remote Health2009; 9: 1060–1060.
10.
DoleaCStormontLBraichetJ. Evaluated strategies to increase attraction and retention of health workers in remote and rural areas. Bull World Health Organ2010; 88: 379–385.
11.
GüntherOHKürsteinBRiedel-HellerSG. The role of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on the choice of practice establishment: a stated preference study of young physicians in Germany. Health Serv Res2010; 45: 212–229.
12.
LangenbrunnerJCOroszEKutzinJ. Purchasing and paying providers. In: FiguerasJRobinsonRJakubowskiE (eds). Purchasing to improve health systems performance, Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2004, pp. 236–264.
13.
GosdenTForlandFKristiansenIS. Capitation, salary, fee-for-service and mixed systems of payment: effects on the behaviour of primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2000; (3): CD002215–CD002215.
14.
ZweifelPBreyerFKifmannM. Health economics, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009.
15.
RaginCC. The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantative strategies, Berkeley, London: University of California Press, 1987.
16.
SchneiderCQWagemannC. Qualitative comparative analysis und fuzzy sets: Ein Lehrbuch für Anwender und jene, die es werden wollen, Opladen: Budrich, 2007.
17.
RihouxB. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques: recent advances and challenges. In: PickelSPickelGLauthH (eds). Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2009, pp. 365–385.
18.
EC. Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS).
19.
CulyerAJWagstaffA. Equity and equality in health and health care. J Health Econ1993; 12: 431–457.
20.
van DoorslaerEKoolmanXPufferF. Equity in the use of physician visits in OECD countries: has equal treatment for equal need been achieved. In: OECD (eds). Measuring up: improving health system performance in OECD countries, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2002, pp. 225–248.
21.
MatsumotoMInoueKBowmanR. Geographical distributions of physicians in Japan and US: impact of healthcare system on physician dispersal pattern. Health Policy2010; 96: 255–261.
22.
GEK. GEK-Report ambulant-ärztliche Versorgung: Auswertungen der GEK-Gesundheitsberichterstattung, St. Augustin: Asgard-Verl, 2008.
Eurostat. Consultation of a medical professional during the last 4 weeks by sex, age and educational level, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu (2008, accessed 12 April 2012).
RaginCC. Measurement versus calibration: a set-theoretic approach. In: Box-SteffensmeierJMBradyHECollierD (eds). The Oxford handbook of political methodology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 174–199.
30.
RaginCC. Set relations in social research: evaluating their consistency and coverage. Polit Anal2006; 14: 291–310.
WaltGGilsonL. Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Policy Plan1994; 9: 353–370.
33.
WaltGShiffmanJSchneiderH. ‘Doing’ health policy analysis: methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges. Health Policy Plan2008; 23: 308–317.
