This study employs a modified photovoice approach to explore justice-involved women’s understandings of online privacy, challenges they face in protecting themselves online, and practical strategies they use to navigate these issues. A total 48 women transitioning from incarceration in three neighboring cities in the U.S. Midwest participated in research sessions aimed at understanding their perceptions related to online privacy. When selecting images that reflected their perspectives on online privacy, participants often chose those representing experiences of vulnerability, privacy resignation, and selective privacy. These themes reflect complex and often contradictory dynamics that shape how justice-involved women navigate digital spaces. The results offer both theoretical and practical implications for digital literacy initiatives, online privacy and security education, and communication research.
BabbieE (2020) The Practice of Social Research. 15th edition. Cengage Learning.
2.
BadantaBAcevedo‐AguileraRLucchettiG, et al. (2021) A picture is worth a thousand words’—A photovoice study exploring health professionals’ experiences during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Journal of Clinical Nursing30(23-24): 3657–3669. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15887
3.
BainesASeoHAltschwagerD, et al. (2024) COVID-19 pandemic and women transitioning from incarceration: a study of online health information seeking among underserved and marginalized women. Feminist Media Studies: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2024.2400486
4.
BlombergMAltschwagerDSeoH, et al. (2021) Digital divide and marginalized women during COVID-19: a study of women recently released from prison. Information, Communication & Society24(14): 2113–2132. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2021.1963462
5.
BrayneS (2021) Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing. Oxford University Press.
6.
BüchiMJustNLatzerM (2017) Caring is not enough: the importance of internet skills for online privacy protection. Information, Communication & Society20(8): 1261–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1229001
7.
CatalaniCMinklerM (2010) Photovoice: a review of the literature in health and public health. Health Education & Behavior37(3): 424–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198109342084
ChildJTPetronioS (2011) Unpacking the paradoxes of privacy in CMC relationships: the challenges of blogging and relational communication on the internet. In: WrightKBWebbLM (eds) Computer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships. Peter Lang, pp. 21–40.
10.
ChildJTStarcherSC (2016) Fuzzy Facebook privacy boundaries: exploring mediated lurking, vague-booking, and facebook privacy management. Computers in Human Behavior54: 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.035
11.
ClarkeRWrightPBalaamM, et al. (2013April). Digital portraits: photo-sharing after domestic violence. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2517–2526.
12.
Correctional Association of New York (2011) From protection to punishment: Post-conviction barriers to justice for domestic violence survivor-defendants in New York State. Avon Global Center for Women and Justice at Cornell Law School & Women in Prison Project.
13.
DasABonneauJCaesarM, et al. (2014, February). The tangled web of password reuse. In Ndss (Vol. 14, No. 2014: pp. 23–26).
14.
Delgado RodriguezSDao PhuongABumillerF, et al. (2023, December). Padlock, the universal security symbol? Exploring symbols and metaphors for privacy and security. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (pp. 10–24).
15.
ElhaiJDLevineJCHallBJ (2017) Anxiety about electronic data hacking: predictors and relations with digital privacy protection behavior. Internet Research27(3): 631–649. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-03-2016-0070
16.
FangMLCanhamSLBattersbyL, et al. (2019) Exploring privilege in the digital divide: implications for theory, policy, and practice. The Gerontologist59(1): e1–e15. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny037
17.
GoedhartNSBroerseJEKattouwR, et al. (2019) Just having a computer doesn’t make sense’: the digital divide from the perspective of mothers with a low socio-economic position. New Media & Society21(11-12): 2347–2365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819846059
18.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books, University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre.
19.
GoffmanE (1973) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Overlook Press.
20.
GrootBCSchrijverJAbmaTA (2021) Are you afraid of press and social media? Ethics in photovoice in participatory health research. Educational Action Research31: 556–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1941164
21.
HargittaiEPiperAMMorrisMR (2018) From internet access to internet skills: digital inequality among older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society18: 881–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0617-5
22.
HergenratherKCRhodesSDCowanCA, et al. (2009) Photovoice as community-based participatory research: a qualitative review. American Journal of Health Behavior33(6): 686–698. https://doi.org/10.5993/ajhb.33.6.6
23.
KangRDabbishLFruchterN, et al. (2015) {“My} data just goes {Everywhere:”} user mental models of the internet and implications for privacy and security. Eleventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2015), pp. 39–52.
24.
KhairullinaIAlbatsEPodmetinaD (2025) Photovoice for reflection-based learning of creativity and innovation. Journal of Visual Literacy44(2): 224–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144x.2025.2514887
25.
LeeN (2018) Fake news, phishing, and fraud: a call for research on digital media literacy education beyond the classroom. Communication Education67(4): 460–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1503313
26.
LyonD (2003) Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination. Routledge.
27.
LyonD (2018) The Culture of Surveillance: Watching as a Way of Life. John Wiley & Sons.
28.
MolitoriszS (2020) Net Privacy: How We Can Be Free in an Age of Surveillance. McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP.
NgCGTingSQSaifiRA, et al. (2024) Ethical issues in photovoice studies involving key populations: a scoping review. Asian Bioethics Review16(1): 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-023-00264-3
Ogbonnaya-OgburuIFToyamaKDillahuntT (2018, October). Returning citizens' job search and technology use: preliminary findings. In Companion of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 365-368).
PetronioS (1991) Communication boundary management: a theoretical model of managing disclosure of private information between marital couples. Communication Theory1(4): 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1991.tb00023.x
35.
PetronioS (2002) Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure. State University of New York Press.
ReisdorfBCRikardRV (2018) Digital rehabilitation: a model of reentry into the digital age. American Behavioral Scientist62(9): 1273–1290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218773817
RonziSPopeDOrtonL, et al. (2016) Using photovoice methods to explore older people’s perceptions of respect and social inclusion in cities: opportunities, challenges and solutions. SSM-Population Health2: 732–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.09.004
40.
SeoHAltschwagerDChoiB-Y, et al. (2021) Informal technology education for women transitioning from incarceration. ACM Transactions on Computing Education21(2): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3425711
41.
SeoHBrittonHRamaswamyM, et al. (2022) Returning to the digital world: digital technology use and privacy management of women transitioning from incarceration. New Media & Society24(3): 641–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820966993
42.
SmithSABrunnerSR (2017) To reveal or conceal: using communication privacy management theory to understand disclosures in the workplace. Management Communication Quarterly31(3): 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318917692896
43.
SmithJHewittBSkrbišZ (2015) Digital socialization: young people's changing value orientations towards internet use between adolescence and early adulthood. Information, Communication & Society18(9): 1022–1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1007074
SoloveDJ (2013) Privacy self-management and the consent dilemma. Harvard Law Review126: 1880–1903.
46.
TraxlerJ (2018) Digital literacy: a Palestinian refugee perspective. Research in Learning Technology26(0): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.1983
47.
UzuegbunamCE (2025) Decolonial approaches to researching children and youth’s digital cultures: epistemologies of the south lenses. Emerging Media3: 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/27523543241305818
48.
WangCBurrisMA (1997) Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior24(3): 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309
49.
ZuboffS (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffars.
