This study explores the characteristics of PLLI, the fandom of the Korean virtual idol group PLAVE, through an interpretivist lens. Rooted in ethnographic fieldwork, this study examines the rapid emergence of large virtual idol fandoms in Korea between 2023 and 2024. Data were collected through a year-long participant observation and in-depth one-on-one interviews, focussing on digital content accumulated within online fan communities. This approach enabled detailed tracking of how virtual idol fandoms engage in fan activities and interact within their communities. The findings reveal that the unique platform characteristics of virtual idols—communicating with fans through a screen—give rise to paradoxical storytelling. Differences in merchandise consumption patterns among PLLIs were shaped by their prior fan experiences, reflecting PLAVE’s paradoxical narrative that blurs the boundaries between fictional characters and real idols. When fans encountered overlaps or dissonances between virtual and physical bodies, they often embraced these gaps as part of the unique charm exclusive to virtual idols, indicating an awareness that PLAVE is distinct from conventional K-pop idols. Nevertheless, fans also wish for PLAVE to be recognized as K-pop artists like other idol groups, actively engaging in fan labour toward this goal. Such practices foster a novel form of parasocial intimacy with virtual idols who remain physically unreachable. By functioning simultaneously as fictional characters and real performers, PLAVE induces a unique ontological experience through a paradoxical strategy. This interaction suggests a sustainable revenue model while offering pathways to transcend systemic structural issues within the K-pop industry. Ultimately, this research emphasizes the necessity of integrating macro-cultural frameworks with micro-level fan interactions, providing a nuanced perspective on this burgeoning virtual idol phenomenon.
AhnDParkSLeeS, et al. (2025) I Stan alien idols and also the people behind them: understanding how seams between virtual and real identities engage VTuber fans – a case study of PLAVE, In: Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Honolulu, HI, New York: ACM, pp. 1–13.
2.
AscueAGSBalmeoDKCUnayRB, et al. (2023) Annyeong, saranghae!!!’: a phenomenological study on the effects of parasocial relationships between adult Filipino K-pop fans and their idols. In: Paper Presented at the 2nd Senior High School Research Conference. Manila: De La Salle University Integrated School. Available at: https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/conf_shsrescon/2023/paper_lcs/1/ (accessed 14 August 2025).
Az Zahro AMSTHN R (2025) Para-social relationship activity: case study in treasure and treasure maker on the weverse app on 2023–2024. Jurnal Audiens, 6(2), 241–253. Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. https://doi.org/10.18196/jas.v6i2.544
BlackD (2008) The virtual ideal: virtual idols, cute technology and unclean biology. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies22(1): 37–50. DOI: 10.1080/10304310701861832.
7.
BlackD (2012) The virtual idol: producing and consuming digital femininity. In: GalbraithPWKarlinJG (eds) Idols and Celebrity in Japanese Media Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 209–228.
ChangHCHPhamBFerraraE (2023) Parasocial diffusion: K-Pop fandoms help drive COVID-19 public health messaging on social media. Online Social Networks and Media, 37–38: 100267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100267
10.
ChoiHJ (2024) Do K-pop consumers’ fandom activities affect their happiness, listening intention, and loyalty?Behavioral Sciences14(12): 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14121136
CreswellJWPothCN (2018) Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
DerbaixMKorchiaMPadiouM (2023) Fans as prosumers: labour of love. International Journal of Arts Management25(2): 4–15. DOI: 10.37329/ganaya.v8i3.4557.
14.
DibbleJLHartmannTRosaenSF (2016) Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research42(1): 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063
15.
DuffettM (2013) Understanding Fandom: An Introduction to the Study of Media Fan Culture. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
16.
Elfving-HwangJK (2018) K-Pop idols, artificial beauty and affective fan relationships in South Korea. In: ElliotA (ed) Handbook of Celebrity Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 190–201.
17.
FerreiraJCVRegisRDDGonçalvesP, et al. (2022) VTuber concept review: the new frontier of virtual entertainment, In: Proceedings of the 24th Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality. Japan: Tsukuba, pp. 83–96.
HakimKASalehudinI (2024) Exploring the impact of persuasion knowledge and parasocial relationships on K-pop fans’ consumer behavior in Indonesia. Journal of Enterprise and Development (JED)6(3): 679–691. DOI: 10.20414/jed.v6i3.11803.
HuangQQQuHJLiP (2022) The influence of virtual idol characteristics on consumers' clothing purchase intention. Sustainability14: 8964. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148964
22.
JangSParkJH (2025) The struggle for recognition in virtual idol fandom: the study of plave fandom. Media, Gender & Culture40(1): 179–232. https://doi.org/10.38196/mgc.2025.3.40.1.179
23.
JangWSongJE (2017) The influences of K-pop fandom on increasing cultural contact: with the case of Philippine K-pop convention, inc. Korean Regional Sociology, 18, 29–56. Seoul: Korean Regional Sociology Association, University of Seoul. DOI: 10.30656/jhak.v2i1.10522.
24.
JenkinsH (2008) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. Updated ed.New York, NY: New York University Press.
25.
JinDY (2023) Understanding the Korean Wave: Transnational Korean Pop Culture and Digital Technologies. Routledge.
26.
JungS (2012) Fan activism, cybervigilantism, and othering mechanisms in K-pop fandom. Transformative Works and Cultures10. https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2012.0313
27.
KalraPMangiliAThalmannNM, et al. (1992) Simulation of facial muscle actions based on rational free form deformations. Computer Graphics Forum11(3): 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8659.1130059
28.
KangE (2024) A study on virtual idol fandom: focusing on PLAVE. Journal of Digital Art Engineering & Multimedia11(4): 451–460. https://doi.org/10.29056/jdaem.2024.12.03
29.
KimCYHanHW (2020) Analysis on pataphysics of virtual idol based on game Character—Focus on K/DA. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association20(5): 69–78.
30.
KimMSWangSKimS (2023) Effects of online fan community interactions on well-being and sense of virtual community. Behavioral Sciences13(11): 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110897
31.
LamerichsN (2018) Fan membership: traditional and digital fieldwork, In: Productive Fandom: Intermediality and Affective Reception in Fan Cultures. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 47–66.
32.
LeeSLeeJ (2023) “Ju. T’aime” my idol, my streamer: a case study on fandom experience as audiences and creators of VTuber concert. IEEE Access11(99): 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3252563
33.
LeeSPreyR (2025) The labor process of relational labor: the case of the K-pop fan platform ‘bubble. Popular Music and Society48: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2025.2492505
34.
LiW (2023) The K-pop phenomenon: analyzing success secrets of S.M. entertainment in global fandom. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences9: 350–355. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/9/20230409
35.
LiuJ (2023) Virtual presence, real connections: exploring the role of parasocial relationships in virtual idol fan community participation. In: Global Media and China. London: Sage Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.1177/20594364231222976.
36.
LuZShenCLiJ, et al. (2021) More kawaii than a real-person live streamer: understanding how the otaku community engages with and perceives virtual YouTubers. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, Yokohama, Japan, 8–13 May 2021, 1–13. New York, NY: ACM. Available at: https://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/hongs/files/CHI21-vtuber.pdf (accessed 14 August 2025).
37.
MertensDMMcLaughilinJA (1995) Research methods in special education Applied Social research Methods Series, Vol. 37. Sage Publication, Ins.
38.
NomaTBadlerN (1997) A virtual human presenter, In: IJCAI'97 Workshop on Animated Interface Agents. Japan: Nagoya, pp. 45–51.
OtmazginNLyanI (2019) Fan entrepreneurship: fandom, agency, and the marketing of hallyu in Israel. Kritika Kultura32: 288–307. DOI: 10.13185/1656-152x.1276.
41.
ParkEJ (2025) Comparative analysis of research trends on virtual idols in Korea and Japan. Journal of Media Art and Korean Animation88: 163–178. DOI: 10.16979/jmak..88.202505.163.
42.
PattonMQ (1990) Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publication, Inc.
43.
PyunMFangLPiY (2024) The relationship between K-pop fandom activities on social media platform and cultural openness: attitudes toward the K-wave as a mediator. Asian Communication Research21(3): 346–365. https://doi.org/10.20879/acr.2024.21.032.
44.
Seoul Economic Daily (2024) Virtual idols emerging as a K-pop genre rivaling BTS... major entertainment companies stake their future. Seoul Economic Daily, Available at: https://www.sedaily.com/NewsView/2DE7OVAZH3 (accessed 14 August 2025).
45.
SolomonMR (2009) Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being. 8th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
46.
SoudersAJ (2022) The new pied pipers: the globalization of K-pop and the role of parasocial relationships. Doctoral dissertation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.
47.
SousaAM (2016) Beauty is in the eye of the “produser”: japan’s virtual idol hatsune miku from software, to network, to stage. Post-screen: Intermittence + Interference: 117–128.
48.
SungSY (2013) K-pop reception and participatory fan culture in Austria. Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review9: 90–104, Available at: https://cross-currents.berkeley.edu/e-journal/issue-9/sung (accessed 14 August 2025).
49.
UphamFLeeJHParkSY (2024) Audience reconstructed: social media interaction by BTS fans during live stream concerts. Frontiers in Psychology15: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1214930
50.
YoonK (2018) Transnational fandom in the making: K-Pop fans in Vancouver. International Communication Gazette81(2): 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518802964
51.
YoonK (2022) Between universes: fan positionalities in the transnational circulation of K-pop. Communication and the Public7(4): 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473221136667
52.
YoonKLabarta GarciaCA (2024) Exploring cultural hybridity, questioning cultural appropriation: peruvian fans’ responses to Latin tropes in K-pop. International Journal of Cultural Studies27(5): 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779231224474
53.
YuYKwongSCBannasilpA (2023) Virtual idol marketing: benefits, risks, and an integrated framework of the emerging marketing field. Heliyon9(11): e22164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22164
54.
ZhangY (2022) Combining virtual idols and mainstream media in the context of integrated media: taking the case of luo tianyi for example. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research664: 480–484. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220504.087
55.
ZhangX (2023a) The research on the characteristics of Chinese game virtual streamers. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Reform, Humanities and Social Studies (ERHSS 2023), Suzhou, China, 18–19 November 2023, Vol. 9, 52–60: Boya Century Publishing (BCP Education & Psychology). https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v9i.4608
56.
ZhangZ (2023b) Para-kin relationship between fans and idols: a qualitative analysis of fans’ motivations for purchasing idol-dolls. Online Media and Global Communication2(3): 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2023-0019
57.
ZhaoY (2022) Analysis of the social impact of fandom culture in “idol” context. Advances in Journalism and Communication10: 377–386. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajc.2022.104022
