The dystopian imaginaries of ChatGPT: A designed cycle of fear

Abstract

The advent of OpenAI’s ChatGPT in 2022 catalyzed a wave of excitement and apprehension, but especially fear. This article examines the dystopian narratives that emerged after ChatGPT’s release date. Through a critical analysis of media responses, we uncover how dystopian imaginaries discussing ChatGPT become rhetorically constructed in popular, journalistic discourse. The article locates prevalent anxieties surrounding ChatGPT’s unprecedented text-generation capabilities, and identifies recurrent fears regarding academic integrity, the proliferation of misinformation, ethical dilemmas in human-AI interaction, and the perpetuation of social biases. Moreover, the article introduces the concept of ‘fear cycles’ – recurring patterns of dystopian projections in response to emerging technologies. By documenting and dissecting these fear cycles, we offer insights into the underlying rhetorical features that drive societal reactions to technological advancements. The research ultimately contributes to a nuanced understanding of how ChatGPT dystopian imaginaries develop particular futures, while grounding the present in predictable anxieties related to technological innovation.

Keywords

Dystopia ChatGPT artificial intelligence news media rhetoric journalism chatbot

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alkemade

Suurs

(2012) Patterns of expectations for emerging sustainable technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79(3): 448–456.

Andrejevic

(2008) Power, knowledge, and governance: foucault’s relevance to journalism studies. Journalism Studies 9(4): 605–614. DOI: 10.1080/14616700802114464.

Anthony, L. (n.d.). AntConc. Laurence Anthony's Website. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/ (accessed 10 March 2024).

Bazerman

(1998) The production of technology and the production of human meaning. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 12(3): 381–387.

Bazerman

(2002) The Languages of Edison’s Light. MIT Press.

Berkhout

(2006) Normative expectations in systems innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18(3–4): 299–311.

boyd

Crawford

(2012) Critical questions for big data: provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society 15(5): 662–679. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.

Brennen

Howard

Nielsen

(2018) An industry-led debate: how UK media cover artificial intelligence. DOI: 10.60625/RISJ-V219-D676.

Brennen

Howard

Nielsen

(2022) What to expect when you’re expecting robots: futures, expectations, and pseudo-artificial general intelligence in UK news. Journalism 23(1): 22–38. DOI: 10.1177/1464884920947535.

10.

Browne

(2023) A.I. Tools like Microsoft-backed ChatGPT replaced crypto as the hot tech topic of Davos. CNBC. https://cnbc.com/2023/01/20/chatgpt-microsoft-backed-ai-tool-replaces-crypto-as-hot-davos-tech-topic.html (Accessed 20 Jan 2024).

11.

Cave

Dihal

(2019) Hopes and fears for intelligent machines in fiction and reality. Nature Machine Intelligence 1(2): 74–78. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0020-9.

12.

Clarence-Smith

(2023) ‘Goodbye Homework!’ Elon Musk Praises AI Chatbot that Writes Student Essays. The Telegraph. https://telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/01/05/homework-elon-musk-chatgpt-praises-ai-chatbot-writes-students/ (Accessed 15 Jan 2023).

13.

Cohen

(2002) Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. 3rd edition. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203361711.

14.

Dandurand

McKelvey

Roberge

(2023) Freezing out: legacy media’s shaping of AI as a cold controversy. Big Data & Society 10: 20539517231219240. DOI: 10.1177/20539517231219242.

15.

Dempster

Sutherland

Keogh

(2022) Scientific research in news media: a case study of misrepresentation, sensationalism and harmful recommendations. Journal of Science Communication 21: A06. DOI: 10.22323/2.21010206.

16.

Dourish

Bell

(2011) Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing. MIT Press.

17.

Ferrari

(2020) Technocracy meets populism: the dominant technological imaginary of Silicon Valley. Communication, Culture and Critique 13: 121–124. DOI: 10.1093/ccc/tcz051.

18.

Froehlich

(2015) Corpus analysis with AntConc. In: Programming Historian. Available at: https://programminghistorian.org/en/lessons/corpus-analysis-with-antconc (accessed 5 June 2024).

19.

Gillespie

(2010) The politics of platforms. New Media & Society 12(3): 347–364.

20.

Hatzius

Joseph

Devesh

, et al. (2023) The potentially large effects of artificial intelligence on economic growth. Goldman Sachs: Global Economics Analyst. https://gspublishing.com/content/research/en/reports/2023/03/27/d64e052b-0f6e-45d7-967b-d7be35fabd16.html (Accessed March 2023).

21.

Haupt

(2021) Facebook futures: Mark Zuckerberg’s discursive construction of a better world. New Media & Society 23(2): 237–257. DOI: 10.1177/1461444820929315.

22.

Hawk

(2007) A counter-history of composition: Toward methodologies of complexity. University of Pittsburgh Press, 163.

23.

Hockenhull

Cohn

(2021) Hot air and corporate sociotechnical imaginaries: Performing and translating digital futures in the Danish tech scene. New Media & Society 23(2): 302–321.

24.

Hoffmann

Lavie

Reuer

, et al. (2018) The interplay of competition and cooperation. Strategic Management Journal 39(12): 3033–3052.

25.

Konrad

(2006) The social dynamics of expectations: the interaction of collective and actor-specific expectations on electronic commerce and interactive television. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18(3–4): 429–444.

26.

Leaver

Srdarov

(2023) ChatGPT isn't magic: the hype and hypocrisy of generative artificial intelligence (AI) rhetoric. M/C Journal 26(5).

27.

Liao

(2019) Future directions for mobile augmented reality research: understanding relationships between augmented reality users, nonusers, content, devices, and industry. Mobile Media & Communication 7(1): 131–149.

28.

Loos

Radicke

(2024) Using ChatGPT-3 as a writing tool: an educational assistant or a moral hazard? Current ChatGPT-3 media representations compared to Plato’s critical stance on writing in Phaedrus. AI and Ethics: 1–14.

29.

Lucia

Vetter

Adubofour

(2023) Behold the metaverse: Facebook’s Meta imaginary and the circulation of elite discourse. New Media & Society 27: 14614448231184248. DOI: 10.1177/14614448231184249.

30.

Marčetić

Nolin

(2023) Utopian and Dystopian Sociotechnical Imaginaries of Big Data. Journal of Digital Social Research 5(4): 93–125.

31.

Marr

(2023) A short history of hatGPT: how we gGot to where we are today. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/05/19/a-short-history-of-chatgpt-how-we-got-to-where-we-are-today/?sh=2456372a674f

32.

Marwick

(2015) Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age. Yale University Press.

33.

Nadler

(2019) Nature’s economy and news ecology: scrutinizing the news as ecosystem metaphor. Journalism Studies 20(6): 823–839. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2018.1427000.

34.

Nguyen

Hekman

(2022) The news framing of artificial intelligence: a critical exploration of how media discourses make sense of automation. AI & Society 39: 1–15.

35.

Oomen

Hoffman

Hajer

(2022) Techniques of futuring: on how imagined futures become socially performative. European Journal of Social Theory 25(2): 252–270. DOI: 10.1177/1368431020988826.

36.

Ouchchy

Coin

Dubljević

(2020) AI in the headlines: the portrayal of the ethical issues of artificial intelligence in the media. AI & Society 35: 927–936.

37.

Pedersen

(2013) Ready to Wear: A Rhetoric of Wearable Computers and Ready-Shifting Media. Parlor Press.

38.

Polizzi

(2023) Internet users’ utopian/dystopian imaginaries of society in the digital age: theorizing critical digital literacy and civic engagement. New Media & Society 25(6): 1205–1226.

39.

Popiel

(2018) The tech lobby: tracing the contours of new media elite lobbying power. Communication, Culture and Critique 11(4): 566–585.

40.

Potter

(2012) Imaginaries and realities, utopia and dystopia. Alternate routes. A Journal of Critical Social Research 23.

41.

Roe

Perkins

(2023) What they’re not telling you about ChatGPT’: exploring the discourse of AI in UK news media headlines. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10(1): 1–9.

42.

Ruef

Markard

(2010) What happens after a hype? How changing expectations affected innovation activities in the case of stationary fuel cells. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22(3): 317–338.

43.

Sartori

Bocca

(2023) Minding the gap(s): public perceptions of AI and socio-technical imaginaries. AI & Society 38: 443–458. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-022-01422-1.

44.

Shor

(2010) Dying Empire: US Imperialism and Global Resistance. Routledge.

45.

Stone

Brooks

Brynjolfsson

, et al. (2022). Artificial intelligence and life in 2030: the one hundred year study on artificial intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.06318 .

46.

Wang

Downey

Yang

(2023) AI anxiety? Comparing the sociotechnical imaginaries of artificial intelligence in UK, Chinese and Indian newspapers. Global Media and China. 20594364231196547.