Wikipedia, despite its volunteer-driven nature, stands as a trustworthy repository of information, thanks to its transparent and verifiable processes. However, Large Language Models (LLMs) often use Wikipedia as a source without acknowledging it, creating a disconnect between users and Wikipedia’s rich framework. This poses a triple threat to information literacy, Wikipedia’s vitality, and the potential for dynamic, updated information. This article explores the interplay between representation, accessibility, and LLMs on Wikipedia, highlighting the importance of preserving Wikipedia as a space for access, representation, and ultimately advocacy in an increasingly LLM-dominated information landscape. This article contends that, despite being over two decades old, Wikipedia remains vital not only for knowledge accumulation but also as a sanctuary for the future of knowledge representation, championing representation and accessibility in the age of closed-system LLMs.
AbidAFarooqiMZouJ (2021) Persistent Anti-Muslim bias in large language models. In: Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI. Ethics: and Society, 298–306. July 2021, Online. DOI: 10.1145/3461702.3462624
2.
Association of College & Research Libraries (2015) “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education.” Association of College & Research Libraries. Chicago, IL. https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
BearJCollierB (2016) Where are the women in Wikipedia? Understanding the different psychological experiences of men and women in Wikipedia. Sex Roles74: 254–265. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-015-0573-y.
6.
BenklerY (2020) From utopia to practice and back. In: ReagleJKoernerJ (eds). Wikipedia @ 20: Stories of an Incomplete Revolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 43–54.
DonlanR (2010) From the editor: Wikipedia and the digital divide. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve20(5): 281–283. DOI: 10.1080/1072303X.2010.523669.
14.
Evenstein SigalovSNachmiasR (2017) Wikipedia as a platform for impactful learning: a new course model in higher education. Education and Information Technologies22(6): 2959–2979.
15.
FerraraE (2023) Should ChatGPT Be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Models. arXiv:2304.03738. arXiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.03738.
16.
FordH (2022) Writing the Revolution: Wikipedia and the Survival of Facts in the Digital Age. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
17.
ForteABruckmanA (2008) Scaling consensus: Increasing decentralization in Wikipedia Governance. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), 157. January 2008, Waikoloa, Hawaii. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2008.383
GrahamMStraumannRKHoganB (2015) Digital divisions of labor and informational magnetism: Mapping participation in Wikipedia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers105(6): 1158–1178.
20.
HalavaisALackaffD (2008) An analysis of topical coverage of Wikipedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(2): 429–440. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00403.x.
21.
HallMvan der MaatenLGustafsonL, et al. (2022) A Systematic Study of Bias Amplification. arXiv:2201.11706. arXiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2201.11706.
22.
HansenWG (1959) How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners25(2): 73–76. DOI: 10.1080/01944365908978307.
23.
HaraNShachafPHewKF (2010) Cross-cultural analysis of the Wikipedia community. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology61(10): 2097–2108. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21373.
24.
HeideggerM (1962) Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
25.
HeilmanJMWestAG (2015) Wikipedia and medicine: Quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language. Journal of Medical Internet Research17(3): e62. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4069.
26.
HuangSSiddarthD (2023) Generative AI and the Digital Commons (arXiv:2303.11074) arXiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.11074
27.
JankowskiS (2023) The Wikipedia imaginaire: A new media history beyond Wikipedia.org (2001–2022). Internet Histories0(0): 1–21. DOI: 10.1080/24701475.2023.2246261
28.
JemielniakDPrzegalinskaA (2020) Collaborative Society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
29.
JemielniakDWilamowskiM (2017) Cultural diversity of quality of information on Wikipedias. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology68(10): 2460–2470. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23901.
30.
JohanssonHScaramuzzinoG (2019) The logics of digital advocacy: between acts of political influence and presence. New Media & Society21(7): 1528–1545. DOI: 10.1177/1461444818822488.
31.
KantI (1996) An answer to the question: what is enlightenment? (1784). In: GregorMJ (ed). Practical Philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 11–22.
32.
KeeganBGergleDContractorN (2011). Hot off the wiki: Dynamics, practices, and structures in Wikipedia’s coverage of the Tōhoku catastrophes. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 105–113. October 2011, Mountain View, California. DOI: 10.1145/2038558.2038577
McDowellZJVetterMA (2021) Wikipedia and the Representation of Reality. 1st edition. New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
McDowellZJVetterMA (2022a) Wikipedia as open educational practice: experiential learning, critical information literacy, and social justice. Social Media + Society8(1): 205630512210782. DOI: 10.1177/20563051221078224.
39.
McDowellZVetterM (2022b) Fast “truths” and slow knowledge; oracular answers and Wikipedia’s epistemology. Fast Capitalism19(1): 104–112. DOI: 10.32855/fcapital.202201.009.
40.
McDowellZVetterM (2024) The Re-alienation of the commons: Wikidata and the ethics of “free” data. International Journal of Communication18: 590–608.
41.
OngWJ (2012) Orality and Literacy. 3rd edition. New York, NY: Routledge.
ReckerJIndulskaMGreenP, et al. (2019) Information systems as representations: a review of the theory and evidence. Journal of the Association for Information Systems20(6): 735–786. DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00550.
SelwynNGorardS (2016) Students’ use of Wikipedia as an academic resource—Patterns of use and perceptions of usefulness. The Internet and Higher Education28: 28–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.08.004.
46.
SmithDA (2020) Situating Wikipedia as a health information resource in various contexts: a scoping review. PLoS One15(2): e0228786. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228786.
47.
StephandisC (1999) Universal access in the information society. Proceedings of the HCI International ’99 (the 8th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction) on Human-Computer Interaction: Communication, Cooperation, and Application Design2: 913–917. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s102090100008.
48.
WagnerCGarciaDJadidiM, et al. (2015) It’s a Man’s Wikipedia? Assessing gender inequality in an online encyclopedia. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media9(1): 454–463, Article 1 DOI: 10.1609/icwsm.v9i1.14628.
