The present study explored trends of compositional acceleration in top hit songs as a potential consequence of streaming platforms and digital habits of music consumption. Many media users have been shifting towards ‘Permanently online, permanently connected’ (Vorderer et al., 2018) behaviors and are thus likely to face choice overload in many episodes of music consumption. In turn, the creative audio industries seem to adjust strategically to altered audience demands that platforms can identify in their mass data traces. Extending a study by Léveillé Gauvin (2018), we investigate five compositorial features (main tempo, time before voice enters, time before title is mentioned, number of words in song title, and song duration) for Billboard top 10 songs (1986 to 2020) and ‘Spotify’ top 10 songs (2016 to 2020). Across features, long-term trends of accelerated composition have mostly continued in recent years, but only weak evidence was secured for a particular booster effect of the competitive ‘Spotify’ ecology on compositorial acceleration.
AskinNMauskapfM (2017) What makes popular culture popular? Product features and optimal differentiation in music. American Sociological Review82(5): 910–944.
2.
BayerJBDal CinSCampbellSW, et al. (2016) Consciousness and self-regulation in mobile communication. Human Communication Research42(1): 71–97.
3.
ButlerMJ (2006) Unlocking the Groove: Rhythm, Meter, and Musical Design in Electronic Dance Music. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
4.
ChernevABöckenholtUGoodmanJ (2015) Choice overload: a conceptual review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology25(2): 333–358.
5.
ColbjørnsenT (2021) The streaming network: conceptualizing distribution economy, technology, and power in streaming media services. Convergence27(5): 1264–1287.
6.
DiehlKPoynorC (2010) Great expectations?! Assortment size, expectations, and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research47(2): 312–322.
7.
GlantzM (2016) Internet radio adopts a human touch: a study of 12 streaming music services. Journal of Radio & Audio Media23(1): 36–49.
8.
GranadosCBernardoMParejaM (2017) How do creative industries innovate? A model proposal. Creative Industries Journal10(3): 211–225.
9.
HagenAN (2015) The playlist experience: personal playlists in music streaming services. Popular Music and Society38(5): 625–645.
10.
HagenANLüdersM (2017) Social streaming? Navigating music as personal and social. Convergence23(6): 643–659.
11.
HamiltonC (2019) Popular music, digital technologies and data analysis: new methods and questions. Convergence25(2): 225–240.
12.
HarwoodJ (2018) Communication and Music in Social Interaction. San Diego, CA: Cognella.
13.
HracsBJWebsterJ (2021) From selling songs to engineering experiences: exploring the competitive strategies of music streaming platforms. Journal of Cultural Economy14(2): 240–257.
14.
KlimmtCHefnerDReineckeL, et al. (2018) The permanently online and permanently connected mind: mapping the cognitive structures behind mobile internet use. In: VordererPHefnerDReineckeL, et al. (eds) Permanently Online, Permanently Connected. Living and Communicating in a POPC World. New York: Routledge, pp. 18–28.
15.
KnoblochSZillmannD (2002) Mood management via the digital jukebox. Journal of Communication52(2): 351–366.
Léveillé GauvinH (2018) Drawing listener attention in popular music: testing five musical features arising from the theory of attention economy. Musicae Scientiae22(3): 291–304.
19.
Léveillé GauvinH (2021) Music as advertisement. Capturing and sustaining attention in the attention economy era. In: DeavilleJTanSLRodmanR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Music and Advertising. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 794–817.
20.
LeeJHWishkoskiRAaseLMeasP, et al. (2017) Understanding users of cloud music services: selection factors, management and access behavior, and perceptions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology68(5): 1186–1200.
21.
LizardoOSkilesS (2015) Musical taste and patterns of symbolic exclusion in the United States 1993–2012: generational dynamics of differentiation and continuity. Poetics53: 9–21.
22.
LundqvistLOCarlssonFHilmerssonPJuslinPN, et al. (2009) Emotional responses to music: experience, expression, and physiology. Psychology of Music37(1): 61–90.
23.
MaasøAHagenAN (2020) Metrics and decision-making in music streaming. Popular Communication18(1): 18–31.
24.
MontecchioNRoyPPachetF (2020) The skipping behavior of users of music streaming services and its relation to musical structure. PLoS One15(9): e0239418. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239418 (accessed 28 July 2022).
25.
MorrisJM (2020) Music platforms and the optimization of culture. Social Media + Society6(3). DOI: 10.1177/2056305120940690 (accessed 28 July 2022).
26.
PreyR (2020) Locating power in platformization: music streaming playlists and curatorial power. Social Media + Society6(2). DOI: 10.1177/F2056305120933291 (accessed 28 July 2022).
ReineckeLKlimmtCMeierAReichS, et al. (2018) Permanently online and permanently connected: development and validation of the online vigilance scale. PLoS One13(10): e0205384. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205384 (accessed 28 July 2022).
29.
ToscherB (2021) Resource integration, value co-creation, and service-dominant logic in music marketing: the case of the TikTok platform. International Journal of Music Business Research10(1): 33–50.
30.
TownsendCKahnBE (2014) The “visual preference heuristic”: the influence of visual versus verbal depiction on assortment processing, perceived variety, and choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research40(5): 993–1015.
31.
van der HoevenA (2014) Remembering the popular music of the 1990s: dance music and the cultural meanings of decade-based nostalgia. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20(3), 316–330.
32.
VordererPHefneDReineckeL, et al. (2018) Permanently Online, Permanently Connected. Living and Communicating in a POPC World. New York: Routledge.
