This article examines how audience analytics in filmmaking have evolved with digital platforms and AI, impacting creative decisions from concept to production. Through a case study of a Danish consultancy working at the intersection of data analytics and film production, we explore how audience insights are mobilized in creative processes. We propose the term recalcitrant audiencing to describe a mode of audience analytics that challenges filmmakers’ assumptions rather than offering definitive representations of the audience. Our findings show that such practices create a narrative space for renegotiation and disruption, highlighting the nuanced role of algorithms as tools that can elicit rather than dictate creative processes. Rethinking audiencing in this way demonstrates how AI can be integrated with qualitative methods to co-imagine multiple potential audiences for a cultural product still in the making.
AngI (2006) Desperately Seeking the Audience. London and New York: Routledge.
2.
Bjerre-NielsenAGlavindKL (2022) Ethnographic data in the age of big data: how to compare and combine. Big Data & Society9(1): 20539517211069893.
3.
BlokAPedersenMA (2014) Complementary social science? Quali-quantitative experiments in a Big Data world. Big Data & Society1(2): 2053951714543908.
4.
CallonM (1998) An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology. The Sociological Review46(1_suppl): 244–269.
5.
CallonM (2021) Markets in the Making: Rethinking Competition, Goods, and Innovation. New York, United States: Zone Books.
6.
ChoudheryDLeungCK (2017) Social media mining: prediction of box office revenue. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium, New York, NY, 12 July 2017, pp. 20–29.
7.
ChristinA (2020) The ethnographer and the algorithm: beyond the black box. Theory and Society49(5): 897–918.
8.
FisherE (2015) ‘You Media’: audiencing as marketing in social media. Media, Culture & Society37(1): 50–67.
9.
FiskeJ (1992) Audiencing: a cultural studies approach to watching television. Poetics21(4): 345–359.
10.
IldirACelik RappasİA (2022) Netflix in Turkey: localization and audience expectations from video on demand. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies28(1): 255–271.
11.
JänickeSFranziniGCheemaMF, et al. (2015) On close and distant reading in digital humanities: a survey and future challenges. EuroVis (STARs)2015: 83–103.
12.
JensenCB (2010) Asymmetries of knowledge: mediated ethnography and ICT for development. Methodological Innovations Online5(1): 72–85.
13.
JensenTE (2012) Intervention by invitation: new concerns and new versions of the user in STS. Science and Technology Studies25(1): 13–36.
14.
JunkerBH (1960) Field Work: An Introduction to the Social Sciences. Chicago, United States: University of Chicago Press.
15.
KnoxHNafusD (2018) Ethnography for a Data-Saturated World. Manchester, United Kingdom: Manchester University Press.
16.
MacKenzieD (2008) Material Markets: How Economic Agents Are Constructed. Oxford, United Kingdom: OUP Oxford.
17.
MadsenAKMunkAK (2019) Experiments with a data-public: moving digital methods into critical proximity with political practice. Big Data & Society6(1): 2053951718825357.
18.
MadsenAKMunkAKSøltoftJI (2023) Friction by machine: how to slow down reasoning with computational methods. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry - Conference Proceedings2023(1): 65–88.
19.
MadsenAKSøltoftJIKlitgaardA-S (2025) Datafantasi: Fra styring til læring i en verden af vilde problemer. In: NørlemJKleeNAndersenMRF (eds). Organisatorisk Læring Og Forandring: Individer, Grupper Og Processer (Chapter 8). Copenhagen, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.
20.
MorettiF (2005) Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. London, United Kingdom & New York, United States: Verso.
21.
MuniesaF (2004) Assemblage of a market mechanism. Journal of the Center for Information Studies5(3): 11–19.
22.
MuniesaFMilloYCallonM (2007) An introduction to market devices. The Sociological Review55(2_suppl): 1–12.
23.
MunkAK (2019) Four styles of quali-quantitative analysis: making sense of the new Nordic food movement on the web. Nordicom Review40(s1): 159–176.
24.
MuskatMMuskatBZehrerA, et al. (2013) Generation Y: evaluating services experiences through mobile ethnography. Tourism Review68(3): 55–71.
25.
NafusD (2018) Working ethnographically with sensor data. Ethnography for a Data-Saturated World. Manchester, United Kingdom: Manchester University Press, 233–251.
26.
OrankiewiczA (2022) The role of public support for the film industry–an analysis of movie production incentives in Europe. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu66(2): 90–104.
PedersenMA (2023) Editorial introduction: towards a machinic anthropology. Big Data & Society10(1): 20539517231153803.
29.
RedvallEN (2024) Writing and producing for older teens. Aiming for authenticity, relatability, and co-creative strategies. Writing and producing for children and young audiences: Cases from Danish Film and television. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 125–150.
30.
SeaverN (2015) Bastard algebra. Data, Now Bigger and Better. STSinfrastructures, 27–46.
31.
SeaverN (2017) Algorithms as culture: some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society4(2): 2053951717738104.
32.
SeaverN (2022) Computing Taste: Algorithms and the Makers of Music Recommendation. Chicago, United States: University of Chicago Press.
33.
ShardaRDelenD (2006) Predicting box-office success of motion pictures with neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications30(2): 243–254.
34.
SpradleyJP (2016) Participant Observation. Long Grove, IL, United States: Waveland Press.
35.
VenturiniTJacomyMJensenP (2021) What do we see when we look at networks. Big Data & Society8(1).
36.
ZhangLLuoJYangS (2009) Forecasting box office revenue of movies with BP neural network. Expert Systems with Applications36(3): 6580.
