Online fandom communities as networked counterpublics: LGBTQ+ youths’ perceptions of representation and community climate

Abstract

Online fandom communities (OFCs) provide lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and/or gender minority (LGBTQ+) youth opportunities to access community-generated LGBTQ+ representations—contrasting mass media’s continued deficiencies in depiction of LGBTQ+ people and communities. This study sought to better understand LGBTQ+ adolescents’ and young adults’ (age 14–29) perceptions of OFCs regarding LGBTQ+ representation and community climate. Qualitative content analysis was employed to analyze open-ended survey questions from respondents in the United States and Canada (n = 3665). Three primary themes emerged: (1) LGBTQ+ mass media narratives remained insufficient but were improving; (2) counternarratives produced within OFCs were even better; however, (3) the climate of OFCs created challenges and limitations, including to the quantity and quality of depictions of diverse LGBTQ+ identities. Findings indicate OFCs may take on simultaneous qualities of networked publics and counterpublics, allowing youth opportunities to contest LGBTQ+ mass media depictions and problematic representations within OFCs.

Keywords

fan culture fandom lesbian,gay,bisexual,transgender,queer,and other sexual and/or gender minority media representation networked counterpublics networked publics online communities youth

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benkler

(2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

boyd

(2008) Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. Available at: https://www.danah.org/papers/TakenOutOfContext.pdf.

Brennan

(ed), (2019). Queerbaiting and Fandom: Teasing Fans through Homoerotic Possibilities. Lowa city: University of Iowa Press..

Brennan

(2018) Queerbaiting: the ‘playful’ possibilities of homoeroticism. International Journal of Cultural Studies 21(2): 189–206. doi:10.1177/1367877916631050..

Bridges

(2018) A genealogy of queerbaiting: legal codes, production codes, ‘bury your gays’ and ‘The 100 mess’ gays’and ‘The 100 mess’. The Journal of Fandom Studies 6: 115–132. doi:10.1386/jfs.6.2.115_1.

Cho

(2011) Queer Tumblrs, networked counterpublics. In: 61st Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Boston, MA, 27–30 May 2011.

Cho

Eun-Hee Lee

(2014) Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report 19(32): 1–20. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol19/iss32/2.

Craig

McInroy

McCready

, et al. (2015) Media: a catalyst for resilience in sexual minority youth. Journal of LGBT Youth 12(3): 254–275. doi:10.1080/19361653.2015.1040193.

Creswell

Clark

VLP

(2017) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. USA: Sage.

10.

Cunningham

Craig

Silver

(2016) YouTube, multichannel networks and the accelerated evolution of the new screen ecology. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 22(4): 376–391. doi:10.1177/1354856516641620..

11.

Davis

Needham

(2008) Queer TV: Theories, Histories, Politics. New York: Routledge.

12.

Duffett

(2013) Understanding Fandom: An Introduction to the Study of Media Fan Culture. Bloomsbury: IU Bloomington.

13.

Elo

Kääriäinen

Kanste

, et al. (2014) Qualitative content analysis. Sage Open 4(1): 215824401452263. doi:10.1177/2158244014522633..

14.

Fanlore (2019a) Canon. Available at: https://fanlore.org/wiki/Canon (accessed 13 November 2019).

15.

Fanlore (2019b) Fanon. Available at: https://fanlore.org/wiki/Fanon (accessed 13 November 2019).

16.

Fanlore (2019c) Fanwork. Available at: https://fanlore.org/wiki/Fanwork (accessed 19 November 2019).

17.

Fanlore (2020) Racefail ’09. Available at: https://fanlore.org/wiki/RaceFail_%2709 (accessed 20 November 2020).

18.

Farrell

(2012) Subtexters: the queering of Xena fandom. Film Matters 3(3): 3–8. doi:10.1386/fm.3.3.3_1.

19.

Fathallah

(2015) Moriarty’s ghost. Television & New Media 16(5): 490–500. doi:10.1177/1527476414543528.

20.

Fraser

(1993) Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to a critique of actually existing democracy. In: Calhoun

(ed), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, pp. 109–142.

21.

Fung

Boyle

(2019) Fandomization of online video or television in China. Media, Culture & Society 41(7): 995–1010. doi:10.1177/0163443719863353.

22.

GLAAD (2019) Where We Are on TV: 2018-2019. Available at: https://glaad.org/files/WWAT/WWAT_GLAAD_2018-2019.pdf.

23.

Gray

Sandvoss

Harrington

(2007) Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World. New York: New York University Press.

24.

Green

Jenkins

(2006) Normal female interest in men bonking: selections from the Terra Nostra underground and strange bedfellows. In: Jenkins

(ed), Fans, Bloggers and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York: New York University Press, pp. 61–88.

25.

Hanckel

Vivienne

Byron

, et al. (2019) ‘That’s not necessarily for them’: LGBTIQ+ young people, social media platform affordances and identity curation. Media, Culture & Society 41(8): 1261–1278. doi:10.1177/0163443719846612.

26.

Jenkins

(2006) Introduction: confessions of an aca/fan. In: Jenkins

(ed), Fans, Bloggers and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York: New York University Press, pp. 1–6.

27.

Jenkins

Campbell

(2006) “Out of the closet and into the universe”: queers and Star Trek. In: H

Jenkins

(ed), Fans, Bloggers and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York: New York University Press, pp. 61–88.

28.

Jenkins

Billard

, et al. (2017) Participatory politics. In: Keywords in Remix Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 230–245.

29.

Kang

(2019) Call for civil inattention: “RaceFail ‘09” and counterpublics on the internet. Quarterly Journal of Speech 105(2): 133–155. doi:10.1080/00335630.2019.1595100.

30.

Kawamoto

(2003) Media and Society in the Digital Age. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

31.

Logan

(2010) Understanding New Media: Extending Marshall McLuhan. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.

32.

Martin

(2012) It’s (not) in his kiss: gay kisses, narrative strategies, and camera angles in post-network television comedy. Flow. Available at: https://www.flowjournal.org/2012/09/it%E2%80%99s-not-in-his-kiss-gay/.

33.

Mateus

(2011) The public as social experience. Comunicação e Sociedade 19: 275–286. doi:10.17231/comsoc.19(2011).911.

34.

McCann

Southerton

(2019) Repetitions of desire. Girlhood Studies 12(1): 49–65. doi:10.3167/ghs.2019.120106.

35.

McCracken

(2017) Tumblr youth subcultures and media engagement. Cinema Journal 57(1): 151–161. doi:10.1353/cj.2017.0061.

36.

McInroy

(2020) Building connections and slaying basilisks: fostering support, resilience, and positive adjustment for sexual and gender minority youth in online fan communities. Information, Communication and Society 23(13): 1874–1891. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1623902.

37.

McInroy

Beer

OWJ

(2020) Wands up! Internet-mediated social advocacy organizations and youth-oriented connective action. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444820964809.

38.

McInroy

Beer

OWJ

(2021) Adapting vignettes for online social science survey research: eliciting realistic responses to the digital milieu. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. doi:10.1080/13645579.2021.1901440.

39.

McInroy

Craig

(2017) Perspectives of LGBTQ emerging adults on the depiction and impact of LGBTQ media representation. Journal of Youth Studies 20(1): 32–46. doi:10.1080/13676261.2016.1184243.

40.

McInroy

Craig

(2018) Online fandom, identity milestones, and self-identification of sexual/gender minority youth. Journal of LGBT Youth 15(3): 179–196. doi: 10.1080/19361653.2018.1459220.

41.

McInroy

Craig

(2019) It’s like a safe haven fantasy world”: online fandom communities and the identity development activities of sexual and gender minority youth. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. doi: 10.1037/ppm0000234.

42.

Netzley

(2010) Visibility that demystifies: gays, gender, and sex on television. Journal of homosexuality 57: 968–986. doi:10.1080/00918369.2010.503505.

43.

Neville

(2018) ‘The Tent’s Big Enough for Everyone’: online slash fiction as a site for activism and change. Gender, Place & Culture 25(3): 384–398. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2017.1420633.

44.

(2013) A “post-gay” era? Media gaystreaming, homonormativity, and the politics of LGBT integration. Communication, Culture & Critique 6(2): 258–283. doi:10.1111/cccr.12013.

45.

Nölke

(2018) Making diversity conform? An intersectional, longitudinal analysis of LGBT-specific mainstream media advertisements. Journal of Homosexuality 65(2): 224–255. doi:10.1080/00918369.2017.1314163.

46.

Reich

(2011) User comments. In: JB

Singer

Domingo

, et al. (eds), Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 96–117. doi:10.1002/9781444340747.ch6.

47.

Renninger

(2015) “Where I can be myself … where I can speak my mind”: networked counterpublics in a polymedia environment… where I can speak my mind”: networked counterpublics in a polymedia environment. New Media & Society 17: 1513–1529. doi:10.1177/1461444814530095.

48.

Roach

(2018) The homoerotics of the boyband, queerbaiting and rpf in pop music fandoms. The Journal of Fandom Studies 6(2): 167–186. doi:10.1386/jfs.6.2.167_1.

49.

Scodari

(2007) Yoko in cyberspace with Beatles fans: gender and the re-creation of popular mythology. In: J

Gray

Sandvoss

Harrington

(eds), Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World. New York: New York University Press, pp. 48–59.

50.

Seregina

Schouten

(2016) Resolving identity ambiguity through transcending fandom. Consumption Markets & Culture 20(2): 107–130. doi:10.1080/10253866.2016.1189417..

51.

Shaw

(2014) Gaming at the Edge: Sexuality and Gender at the Margins of Gamer Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

52.

Thakur

(2020) New media and the Dalit counter-public sphere. Television & New Media 21(4): 360–375. doi:10.1177/1527476419872133..

53.

The Trevor Project (2021) National Survey on LGBTQ Youth Mental Health 2021. Available at: https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2021/.

54.

Tiidenberg

Siibak

(2018) Affordances, affect and audiences – making sense of networked publics, introduction to AoIR 2017 special issue on networked publics. Studies of Transition States and Societies 10(2): 1–9..

55.

Waggoner

(2018) Bury your gays and social media fan response: television, LGBTQ representation, and communitarian ethics. Journal of Homosexuality 65(13): 1877–1891. doi:10.1080/00918369.2017.1391015..

56.

Warner

(2005) Publics and Counterpublics. Cambridge: Zone Books.

57.

Winderman

Smith

(2019) Minority stress and LGB-inclusive television viewing frequency among LGB adults: the roles of community connectedness and perceived social support. Mass Communication and Society 22(2): 248–269. doi:10.1007/s12119-016-9361-2..