Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Within this article, we explore the rise of predictive policing in the United States as a form of big data surveillance. Bringing together literature from communication, criminology, and science and technology studies, we use a case study of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA to outline that predictive policing, rather than being a novel development, is in fact part of a much larger, historical network of power and control. By examining the mechanics of these policing practices: the data inputs, behavioral outputs, as well as the key controllers of these systems, and the individuals who influenced their adoption, we show that predictive policing as a form of big data surveillance is a sociotechnical system that is wholly human-constructed, biases and all. Identifying these elements of the surveillance network then allows us to turn our attention to the resistive practices of communities who historically and presently live under surveillance – pointing to the types of actions and imaginaries required to combat the myth and allure that swirls around the rhetoric of big data surveillance today.

Keywords

Big data broken windows critical race local-historical predictive policing resistance sociotechnical systems surveillance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amicelle

Aradau

Jeandesboz

(2015) Questioning security devices: Performativity, resistance, politics. Security Dialogue 46(4): 293–306.

Amoore

Piotukh

(2015) Life beyond big data: Governing with little analytics. Economy and Society 44(3): 341–366.

Angwin

Larson

Mattu

, et al. (2016) Machine bias. ProPublica, 23 May .

Bellafante

(2014, November 27) In New York Public Housing, Policing Broken Lights. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/30/nyregion/in-new-york-public-housing-policing-broken-lights.html?rref=collection/byline/ginia-bellafante (accessed 10 July 2018).

Bennett Moses

Chan

(2018) Algorithmic prediction in policing: Assumptions, evaluation, and accountability. Policing and Society 28(7): 806–822.

Bialik

(2016, January 08) How to make sense of conflicting, confusing and misleading crime statistics. Available at: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-to-make-sense-of-conflicting-confusing-and-misleading-crime-statistics/ (accessed 9 May 2019).

Bodenner

(2015, October 14) Paranoia, half a century ago. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/notes/2015/10/paranoia-in-1967/409396/ (accessed 15 September 2019).

boyd

Crawford

(2012) Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication and Society 15(5): 662–679.

Browne

(2015) Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Duke University Press.

10.

Burrington

(2015, June 29) What Amazon taught the cops. Available at: https://www.thenation.com/article/what-amazon-taught-cops/ (accessed 11 August 2018).

11.

Cardullo

(2015) Hacking multitude’ and big data: some insights from the Turkish ‘digital Coup. Big Data & Society 2(1): 2053951715580599.

12.

Chan

Bennett Moses

(2016) Is big data challenging criminology? Theoretical criminology 20(1): 21–39.

13.

Choudhury

(2018) New data reveals Milwaukee police stops are about race and ethnicity. ACLU. Available at: https://www.aclu.org/blog/criminal-law-reform/reforming-police-practices/new-data-reveals-milwaukee-police-stops-are (accessed 15 June 2018).

14.

Collins et al. v. The City of Milwaukee et al., 81 (United States District Court Eastern District of Wisconsin Milwaukee Division, February 22, 2017).

15.

Collins

(1990) Black feminist thought in the matrix of domination. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment 138: 221–238.

16.

Correia

Wall

(2018) Police: A Field Guide. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.

17.

De Mauro

Greco

Grimaldi

(2016) A formal definition of big data based on its essential features. Library Review 65(3): 122–135.

18.

D’Ignazio

Klein

(2020) Chapter one: The power chapter. MIT Press Open. Available at: https://bookbook.pubpub.org/pub/7ruegkt6?version=279195a6-9900-4d74-96ff-5d1e5849f8ab.

19.

Edwards

(2016, August 31) Predictive policing software is more accurate at predicting policing than predicting crime. Available at: https://www.aclu.org/blog/criminal-law-reform/reforming-police-practices/predictive-policing-software-more-accurate (accessed 12 May 2018).

20.

Eubanks

(2018) Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

21.

Ettlinger

(2018) Algorithmic affordances for productive resistance. Big Data and Society 5(1): 205395171877139.

22.

Ferguson

(2017) The Rise of Big Data Policing: Surveillance, Race, and the Future of Law Enforcement. New York: New York University Press.

23.

Greengard

(2012) Policing the future. Society 55(3): 19–21.

24.

Griffith

(2015) Predictive policing: Seeing the future. Available at: http://www.policemag.com/channel/technology/articles/2015/06/predictive-policing-seeing-the-future.aspx (accessed 12 May 2018).

25.

(2017) Orwell’s 1984 and a Fourth Amendment Cybersurveillance Nonintrusion Test. Washington Law Review 92: 1819–1904.

26.

Hunt

Jessica

John

(2014) Hollywood, Evaluation of the Shreveport Predictive Policing Experiment. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

27.

Hutchins

(2016) Tales of the digital sublime: Tracing the relationship between big data and professional sport. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 22(5): 494–509.

28.

Information Builders (2013) Law Enforcement Analytics. Available at: https://www.informationbuilders.com/sites/default/files/pdf/factsheets/fs_lea_wf_2013.pdf (accessed 12 May 2018).

29.

Information Builders (2014) Information Builders Milwaukee Case Study. Available at: https://www.informationbuilders.com/sites/default/files/pdf/applications/cs_milwaukee_county_sheriffs_office_business_intelligence_integration_webfocus_iway_2014.pdf (accessed 12 May 2018).

30.

Information Builders (2018) Predictive Policing. Available at: https://www.informationbuilders.com/sites/default/files/201801/fs_predictive_policing_webfocus_rstat_0.pdf (accessed 12 May 2018).

31.

Jackson

(2014) Locating Oklahoma: Critical regionalism and transrhetorical analysis in the composition classroom. College Composition and Communication 66(2): 301–326.

32.

Jasanoff

(2006) Biotechnology and empire: The global power of seeds and science. Osiris. 21: 273–292.

33.

Jefferson

(2018) Predictable policing: Predictive crime mapping and geographies of policing and race. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108(1): 1–16.

34.

Karppi

(2018) ‘The computer said so’: On the ethics, effectiveness, and cultural techniques of predictive policing. Social Media + Society 4(2): 205630511876829.

35.

Kelling

(2015) Policing in Milwaukee: A Strategic History. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.

36.

Kelling

Wilson

(1982, March 04) Broken Windows. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304465/ (accessed 13 December 2018).

37.

Kift

Nissenbaum

(2016) Metadata in context-an ontological and normative analysis of the NSA’s bulk telephony metadata collection program. ISJLP 13: 333.

38.

Kisela v. Hughes 17-467 (Supreme Court of the United States, April 2, 2018).

39.

Kubitschko

(2015) Hackers’ media practices: Demonstrating and articulating expertise as interlocking arrangements. Convergence 21(3): 388–402.

40.

Lally

(2017) Crowdsourced surveillance and networked data. Security Dialogue 48(1): 63–77.

41.

LiberateMKE (2019) Available at: https://www.liberatemke.com/ (accessed 15 December 2018).

42.

Lum

Isaac

(2016) To predict and serve? Significance 13(5): 14–19.

43.

Luthern

(2018, February 16). ‘A lifetime in policing’: Chief Ed Flynn retires having radically changed the Milwaukee Police Department. Available at: https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/crime/2018/02/16/lifetime-policing-milwaukee-police-chief-ed-flynn-retires-leaves/334878002/ (accessed 13 December 2018).

44.

Mann

O’Neil

(2016, February 22) Hiring algorithms are not neutral. Available at: https://hbr.org/2016/12/hiring-algorithms-are-not-neutral (accessed 13 December 2018).

45.

Manning

(2017, September 13) Chelsea Manning: The dystopia we signed up for. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/13/opinion/chelsea-manning-big-data-dystopia.html (accessed 15 October 2018).

46.

Mantello

(2016) The machine that ate bad people: The ontopolitics of the precrime assemblage. Big Data and Society 3(2): 205395171668253.

47.

Marx

(2002) What’s new about the ‘new surveillance’? Classifying for change and continuity. Surveillance and Society 1: 9–29.

48.

Milwaukee Police Department (2018) Chief Edward A. Flynn’s 10 Year Retrospective. Milwaukee Independent. Available at: http://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/ChiefFlynn10YearRetrospective.pdf (accessed 13 December 2018).

49.

Neyfakh

(2015, October 15) The FBI has data on police violence. It’s just disastrously incomplete and unreliable. Available at: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2015/10/police-violence-eric-garner-tamir-rice-oscar-grant-all-left-out-of-fbi-s-database-of-officer-involved-killings-the-guardian-reports.html (accessed 13 December 2018).

50.

Oberman

Johnson

(2016) Broken windows: Restoring social order or damaging and depleting New York’s poor communities of color. Cardozo Law Review 37(3): 931–954.

51.

O’Neil

(2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York, NY: Crown Books.

52.

Pawasarat

Quinn

(2013) Wisconsin’s mass incarceration of African American males: Workforce challenges for 2013. ETI Publications.

53.

PoliceOne (2017, June 2) How one sheriff’s office uses integrated data management to gain actionable intelligence. Available at: http://www.prophoenix.com/blog-mkecasestudy/ (accessed 13 December 2018).

54.

Porter

(1996) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

55.

Richardson

Schultz

Crawford

(2019) Dirty data, bad predictions: How civil rights violations impact police data, predictive policing systems, and justice. New York University Law Review Online, Forthcoming.

56.

Ruderman

(2012, June 28) New York Police Department manipulates crime reports, study finds. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/29/nyregion/new-york-police-department-manipulates-crime-reports-study-finds.html (accessed 13 December 2018).

57.

Sanders

Hannem

(2012) Policing “the risky”: Technology and surveillance in everyday patrol work. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 49(4): 389–410.

58.

Sanders

Sheptycki

(2017) Policing, crime and ‘big data’ Towards a critique of the moral economy of stochastic governance. Crime, Law and Social Change 68(1–2): 1–15.

59.

Saunders

Hunt

Hollywood

(2016) Predictions put into practice: A quasi-experimental evaluation of Chicago’s predictive policing pilot. J Exp Criminol 12(3): 347–371.

60.

Schenwar

Bernd

(2018) Community groups work to provide emergency medical alternatives, separate from police. In Macaré

Price

(eds) Who Do You Serve, Who Do You Protect?: Police Violence and Resistance in the United States. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books, pp. 151–161.

61.

Schenwar

Ludwig

(2018) A New Year’s resolution: Don’t call the police. In: Macaré

Price

(eds) Who Do You Serve, Who Do You Protect?: Police Violence and Resistance in the United States. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books, pp. 147–151.

62.

Stop LAPD Spying Coalition (2018) Available at: https://stoplapdspying.org/ (accessed 13 December 2018).

63.

Welles

(2014) On minorities and outliers: The case for making big data small. Big Data and Society 1(1): 205395171454061.

64.

Wexler

(2018) Life, liberty, and trade secrets: Intellectual property in the criminal justice system. Stanford Law Review 70: 1343.

Predictable policing: New technology,old bias,and future resistance in big data surveillance

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References