Online youth political engagement and bureaucratization: The Australian Youth Forum

Abstract

Through in-depth interviews with all 10 youth representatives who worked in the Australian Youth Forum (AYF), Australia’s first online government youth forum, this article explains how online engagement was experienced and understood by those who managed its day-to-day operation. While the AYF was decommissioned in 2014, it was the first, and, till date, only online federal initiative that invited young people to run a government-funded youth public forum. Despite its relatively short existence, the AYF provokes questions about the influence of historically entrenched political values on online youth political participation and policy. Findings from this article have uncovered a series of challenges faced by youth in adjusting to government efforts to regulate consultation within the AYF. Building on Collin’s (2015, Young Citizens and Political Participation in a Digital Society: Addressing the Democratic Disconnect. London: Palgrave Macmillan.) observation of a ‘democratic disconnect’ in Australian youth policy, an incompatibility between government expectations of youth political involvement and how young people value participation, this article suggests that the AYF provided key insights into the centralized bureaucratic arrangements that have historically defined Australian youth participation and how they influence youth participatory experiences in online government initiatives.

Keywords

Government policy media influence mediatization new media online media political communication youth engagement youth policy youth studies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AYF (2008) National Conversation Discussion Paper Summary. Canberra: Government Printer.

Bennett

(2008) Changing citizenship in the digital age. Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth. In: Lance Bennett

John

Catherine

(eds) MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 1–24.

Bessant

(2004) Mixed messages: Youth participation and democratic practice. Australian Journal of Political Science 39(2): 387–404.

Bessant

Webber

(2001) Policy and the youth sector: Youth peaks and why we need them. Youth Studies Australia 20(1): 43–47.

Boeck

Collin

(2012) Youth and adult researcher reflections on participatory research in Australia and the UK. In: Fleming

Boeck

(eds) Involving Children and Young People in Health and Social Care Research. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 197–208.

Chadwick

(2007) Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity. Political Communication 24(3): 283–301.

Chadwick

(2011) Explaining the failure of an online citizen engagement initiative: The role of internal institutional variables. Journal of Information Technology and Politics 8(1): 21–40.

Chen

Gibson

Lusoli

, et al. (2007) Australian governments and online communication. In Young

(eds) Government Communication in Australia. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 161–180.

Collin

(2015) Young Citizens and Political Participation in a Digital Society: Addressing the Democratic Disconnect. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

10.

Counihan

(2009). The Age. Blogging a Dead Horse. Available at: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/blogging-a-dead-horse-20091030-hodl.html (accessed 12 November 2012).

11.

De Brennan

(2005) Online Opinion. National Youth Roundtable Chopped in Half? Available at: http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=1 (accessed 12 September 2015).

12.

Hammersley

Atkinson

(2007) Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London, UK: Routledge.

13.

Irving

Maunders

Sherington

(1995) Youth in Australia: Policy, Administration and Politics: A history Since World War II. Australia: Macmillan Education.

14.

Lindgren

(2012) Introducing connected concept analysis: Confronting the challenge of large online texts through a qualitative approach to quantity. Paper presented to IPP2012: Big Data, Big Challenges, 20–21 September 2012, University of Oxford.

15.

Maunders

(1996) Offices for youth affairs revisited: Coordination in the 1990s. Youth Studies Australia (15): 44–46.

16.

Melville

(2003) Giving peaks a voice: Conceptual challenges, mapping and analysis of advocacy organisations in policy practice. Third Sector Review 9(2): 95–106.

17.

Sawer

(2002) Governing for mainstream: Implications for community representation. Australian Journal of Public Administration 61(1): 39–49.

18.

Sorensen

(2006) Constraints to youth participation in the current federal political environment. Masters Thesis, Edith Cowan University, Perth.

19.

Vromen

(2012) Youth participation from the top down: The perspectives of government and community sector decision makers in Australia. In: van Deth

Maloney

(eds) New Participatory Dimensions in Civil Society: Professionalization and Individualized Collective Action. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 212–230.

20.

White

Wyn

(2008) Youth and Society: Exploring the Social Dynamics of Youth Experience. Victoria, Australia: Oxford University Press.

21.

Wilson

(2010) Social creativity: Requalifying the creative economy. International Journal of Cultural Policy 16(3): 367–381.

22.

Xenos

Vromen

Loader

(2014) The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication and Society 17(2): 151–167.