Music-streaming services embed social features that enable users to connect to one another and use music as social objects. This article examines how these features are experienced within negotiations of music as personal and social through the acts of sharing music and of following others. The analysis relies on 23 focus-group interviews with 124 Spotify and/or Tidal users and a mixed-method study including music-diary self-reports, online observation and interviews with 12 heavy users. Our findings suggest that users incorporate social awareness in non-sharing, selective-sharing and all-sharing approaches with strong, weak and absent ties. These ties are characterized by different configurations of social and music homophily. Negotiations of music as personal and social shape how music-streaming services are experienced.
BaymNKLedbetterA (2009) Tunes that bind?Information, Communication & Society12(3): 408–427.
2.
BenklerY (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
3.
BitnerJ (ed) (2009) Cassettes from My Ex. New York: St Martin’s Griffin.
4.
BlumerH (1998[1969]) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
5.
BrandtzægPB (2012) Social networking sites: Their users and social implications—A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(4): 467–488.
6.
CentolaDGonzalez-AvellaJCEguiluzVM. (2007) Homophily, cultural drift, and the co-evolution of cultural groups. Journal of Conflict Resolution51(6): 905–929.
7.
DeNoraT (2000) Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
DiMaggioP (1987) Classification in art. American Sociological Review52(4): 440–455.
9.
EllisonNSteinfieldCLampeC (2007) The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4): 1143–1168.
10.
EzzyD (2002) Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation. London: Routledge.
11.
GiddensA (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
GilesDCPietrzykowskiSClarkKE (2007) The psychological meaning of personal record collections and the impact of changing technological forms. Journal of Economic Psychology28(4): 429–443.
14.
GoffmanE (1990[1959]) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin Press.
15.
GranovetterMS (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
16.
HektnerJMSchmidtJACsikszentmihalyM (2007) Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
17.
HortonDWohlRR (1986[1956]) Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observation on intimacy at a distance. In: GumpertGCathcartR (eds) Inter/Media: Interpersonal Communication in a Media World. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 185–206.
JonesS (2002) Music that moves: Popular music, distribution and network technologies. Cultural Studies16(2): 213–232.
20.
JonesS (2011) Music and the Internet. In: ConsalvoMEssC (eds) The Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp.440–451.
21.
KibbyM (2009) Collect yourself. Information, Communication & Society12(3): 428–443.
22.
KomulainenSKarukkaMHakkilaJ (2010) Social music services in teenage life—A case study. In: 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction, Brisbane, Australia, 22-26 November 2010, pp. 364–367. New York: ACM Press.
23.
LaplanteA (2011) Social capital and music discovery: An examination of the ties through which late adolescents discover new music. In: 12th international society for music information retrieval conference (ISMIR 2011), Miami, FL, 24-28 October 2011, pp. 341–346. Miami, Florida: ISMIR.
24.
LeongTWWrightPC (2013) Revisiting social practices surrounding music. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘13). Paris: ACM Press. pp. 951–960.
25.
LiuKTReimerRA (2008) Social playlist: Enabling touch points and enriching ongoing relationships through collaborative mobile music listening. In: Processors Mobile HCI ‘08. New York: ACM Press. pp. 403–406.
26.
LizardoO (2006) How cultural tastes shape personal networks. American Sociological Review71(5): 778–807.
27.
MarwickAEboydD (2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society13(1): 114–133.
28.
McKennaKYAGreenASGleasonMEJ (2002) Relationship formation on the internet: What’s the big attraction?Journal of Social Issues58(1): 9–31.
29.
McPhersonMSmith-LovinLCookJM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology27(1): 415–444.
30.
MeadGHMorrisCW (1967[1934]) Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
MesnageCRafiqADixonS. (2011) Music discovery with social networks. In: 2nd workshop on music recommendation and discovery (WOMRAD 2011), Chicago, US, 23 October 2011, pp. 1–6. Chicago: ACM RecSys.
32.
RainieHWellmanB (2012) Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
33.
SimmelGWolffKH (1964) The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.
34.
TepperSJHargittaiE (2009) Pathways to music exploration in a digital age. Poetics, 37(3): 227–249.
35.
TurinoT (1999) Signs of imagination, identity, and experience: A Peircian semiotic theory for music. Ethnomusicology43(2): 221–255.
36.
Van DijckJ (2007) Mediated Memories in the Digital Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
37.
VoidaAGrinterREDucheneautN. (2005) Listening in: Practices surrounding iTunes music sharing. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2005). Portland, Oregon, 2–7 April 2005. New York: ACM Press, pp. 191–200.
38.
YinRK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
