Use of WhatsApp as a social media technology and M-pesa, a mobile money service for crowdfunding in Kenya are proliferating at an incredible pace. Crowdfunding helps communities organize for effective participation in social and economic development and empowerment by making sure that members of the community get to benefit from services, such as access to social amenities and better infrastructure, which would not have been available if the community members were to wait for the government to provide the services. This method is being used at Kisii University for students’ retention and providing social welfare to students, their parents and university staff. The approach adopted by this study was qualitative inductive research, where the researcher had a one-on-one interview session with creators of crowdfunding campaigns and the funders using Skype and phone calls as interview tools.
AgrawalA. K., CataliniC., & GoldfarbA. (2015) Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24(2), 253–274.
ClarkJ. (2009). Public media 2.0: Dynamic, engaged public (White Paper). Washington, DC: Center for Social Media, School of Communication American University.
6.
CormackD. F. S. (Ed.). (1991). The research process in nursing (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific.
7.
DuffyM. E. (1986). Quantitative and qualitative research: Antagonistic or complementary?Nursing and Health Care, 8(6), 356–357.
8.
GarciaR., Acevedo RuizM., Moreno RomeroA. M., & KreinerT. (2013). The role of ICT in scaling up the impact of social enterprises. Journal of Management for Global Sustainability, 1(2), 83–105.
9.
GathuoA. (2000). Kenyan women and the Harambee: Community development or unpaid Work?Trotter Review, 12(1), Article 11. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.umb.edu/trotter_review/vol12/iss1/11
10.
GillmorD. (2004). We the media: Grassroots journalism by the people, for the people. Newton, MA: O’Reilly Media.
11.
GoodhueD. L., & ThompsonR. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.
12.
GrabowiczP. A., RamascoJ. J., MoroE., PujolJ. M., & EguiluzV. M. (2012). Social features of online networks: The strength of intermediary ties in online social media. PloS One, 7(1), e29358.
13.
GranovetterM. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.
14.
HughesN., & LonieS. (2007). M-pesa: Mobile money for the ‘unbanked’ turning cellphones into 24-hour tellers in Kenya. Innovations, 2(1–2), 63–81.
15.
IgboakaP., & HaL. (2010). Determinant of internet use in a rural Nigeria village. Journal of Communication and Media Research, 2(1), 17–31.
16.
JackW., & SuriT. (2011). Mobile money: The economics of M-pesa (No. w16721). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
17.
JacobsonT., & StoreyJ. (2004). Development communication and participation: Applying Habermas to a case study of population programs in Nepal. Communication Theory, 14(2), 99–121. doi: 10.1093/ct/14.2.99.
18.
KarapanosE., TeixeiraP., & GouveiaR. (2016). Need fulfillment and experiences on social media: A case on Facebook and WhatsApp. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 888–897.
19.
KaundaK. (1967). Humanism in Zambia and a guide to its implementation, Part 1. Lusaka: Government Printer.
20.
Kenya Government Printer (1979). Kenya development plan 1979–1983. Nairobi: Kenya Government Printer.
21.
KimP., HomanJ. V., MetzerR. L., & BreeseJ. (2015). Blurred lines: Defining the motives for mobile and social media use for marketing strategy. In Proceedings of the conference on information systems applied research ISSN (Vol. 2167, p. 1508). Retreived from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C16&q=Blurred+Lines%3A+Defining+the+Motives+for+Mobile+and+Social+Media+Use+for+Marketing+Strategy&btnG=
22.
MbitiI., & WeilD. (2011). Mobile banking: The impact of M-pesa in Kenya (NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 17129). Retrieved from www.nber.org/papers/w17129
23.
McHenry JrD. E. (1979). Tanzania’s Ujamaa villages: The implementation of a rural development strategy. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
24.
MelkoteS. R., & SteevesH. L. (2015). Communication for development: Theory and practice for empowerment and social justice (3rd ed.). New Delhi, India: SAGE Publications.
25.
MollickE. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16.
26.
MwangiP. G. (2011, July27). M-pesa Kenyans for Kenya fundraising campaign- donate now!Think MPESA blog. Retrieved from http://www.thinkm-pesa.com/2011/07/m-pesa-kenyafor-kenya-fundraising.html
27.
National Planning Commission (2016). Harambee prosperity plan. Retrieved from https://www.ean.org.na:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/1069/HPP%20page%2070-71.pdf?sequence=1
28.
Ng’etheJ. N. (1979). Harambee and development participation in Kenya: The problems of peasants and elites’ interaction with particular reference to Harambee projects in Kiambu District (PhD thesis). Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario.
29.
OkutheR. (2010, November18). Mobile banking revolution gathers pace, opens new frontier for profits. Daily Nation. Retrieved from https://www.nation.co.ke/business/Tech/Mobilebanking-revolution-gathers-pace/1017288-1056622-jdb753z/index.html
30.
SandelowskiM. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 27–37.
31.
StraubD., & KarahannaE. (1998). Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: Toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organization Science, 9(2), 160–175.
32.
TullyM. (2015). Investigating the role of innovation attributes in the adoption, rejection, and discontinued use of open source software for development. Information Technologies & International Development, 11(3), 55–69.
33.
VenkateshV., MorrisM. G., DavisG. B., & DavisF. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
