Amid growing calls for greater collaboration between journalism and computer programming, this article examines a salient case study that reveals processes of communication, exchange, and work production at the intersection of these social and occupational worlds. We focus on a key stage of the Knight-Mozilla News Technology partnership – namely, an online ‘Learning Lab’ through which 60 individuals sought to coordinate around a shared interest in the innovation of journalism through open-source software. Drawing on the science and technology studies concepts of trading zones and boundary objects, we explore how distinct understandings about news and technology converged, diverged, and ultimately blended around three thematic ambitions: making news more process-oriented, participatory, and socially curated. This window onto boundary negotiations in journalism provides a glimpse into the future development of news and its norms and values, as programmers and their ethics assume a greater role in the journalistic field – in the very heart of some of its leading institutions.
AbbottAD (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AnannyM (2013) Press-Public collaboration as infrastructure: Tracing news organizations and programming publics in application programming interfaces. American Behavioral Scientist57(5): 623–642.
3.
AndersonCW (2013a) Rebuilding the News: Metropolitan Journalism in the Digital Age. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
4.
AndersonCW (2013b) Towards a sociology of computational and algorithmic journalism. New Media & Society15(7): 1005–1021.
5.
BarleyWCLeonardiPMBaileyDE (2012) Engineering objects for collaboration: Strategies of ambiguity and clarity at knowledge boundaries. Human Communication Research38(3): 280–308.
6.
Belair-GagnonV (2015) Social Media at BBC News: The Re-making of Crisis Reporting. London: Routledge.
7.
BoczkowskiPJ (2010) News at Work: Imitation in an Age of Information Abundance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BowkerGCStarSL (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
9.
CarlsonM (2015) Introduction: The many boundaries of journalism. In: CarlsonMLewisSC (eds) Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–18.
10.
CarlsonMLewisSC (eds) (2015) Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation. New York: Routledge.
11.
ColemanEG (2012) Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
12.
DeuzeM (2005) What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism6(4): 442–464.
13.
DeuzeM (2007) Media Work. London: Polity Press.
14.
DupagneMGarrisonB (2006) The meaning and influence of convergence: A qualitative case study of newsroom work at the Tampa News Center. Journalism Studies7(2): 237–255.
15.
FujimuraJ (1992) Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects and ‘translation’. In: PickeringA (ed) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 168–214.
16.
GalisonP (1997) Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
GierynTF (1983) Boundary-Work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review48(6): 781–795.
18.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
19.
GrayJChambersLBounegruL (2012) The Data Journalism Handbook. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.
20.
HineC (ed) (2009) Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. London: Berg.
21.
HowardAB (2014) The Art and Science of Data-driven Journalism. New York: Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia University.
22.
KelloggKCOrlikowskiWJYatesJ (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organization Science17(1): 22–44.
23.
KozinetzR (2009) Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Los Angeles: Sage.
24.
Lainer-VosD (2013) Boundary objects, zones of indeterminacy, and the formation of Irish and Jewish transnational socio-financial networks. Organization Studies34(4): 515–532.
25.
LevinaNVaastE (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly29(2): 335–363.
26.
LewisS (2011) Journalism innovation and participation: An analysis of the Knight news challenge. International Journal of Communication5: 26. Available at: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1140(accessed 1 January 2016).
27.
LewisSC (2012a) From journalism to information: The transformation of the Knight Foundation and news innovation. Mass Communication and Society15(3): 309–334.
28.
LewisSC (2012b) The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society15(6): 836–866.
29.
LewisSCUsherN (2013) Open source and journalism: Toward new frameworks for imagining news innovation. Media, Culture & Society35(5): 602–619.
30.
LewisSCUsherN (2014) Code, collaboration, and the future of journalism: A case study of the Hacks/Hackers global network. Digital Journalism2(3): 383–393.
31.
LewisSCWestlundO (2015) Big data and journalism: Epistemology, expertise, economics, and ethics. Digital Journalism3(3): 447–466.
32.
MillsDHuberMT (2005) Anthropology and the educational ‘trading zone’: Disciplinarity, pedagogy and professionalism. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education4(1): 9–32.
33.
MorrillC (2012) From bridges to trading zones in organizational culture and institutional research. Journal of Management Inquiry21(1): 109–113.
34.
ParasieSDagiralE (2013) Data-driven journalism and the public good: ‘computer-assisted-reporters’ and ‘programmer-journalists’ in Chicago. New Media & Society15(6): 853–871.
35.
RoyalC (2012) The journalist as programmer: A case study of the New York Times interactive news technology department. #ISOJ: The Official Research Journal of the International Symposium for Online Journalism2(1): 5–24.
36.
RyfeDM (2012) Can Journalism Survive? An Inside Look at American Newsrooms. Malden: Polity Press.
37.
SingerJB (2003) Who are these guys? The online challenge to the notion of journalistic professionalism. Journalism4(2): 139–163.
38.
SingerJB (2005) The political j-blogger: ‘normalizing’ a new media form to fit old norms and practices. Journalism6(2): 173–198.
39.
StarSL (2010) This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values35(5): 601–617.
40.
StarSLGriesemerJR (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science19(3): 387–420.
41.
StarrP (1982) The social transformation of American medicine. New York: Basic Books.
42.
StarkD (2009) The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
43.
SteensenS (2009) What’s stopping them? Towards a grounded theory of innovation in online journalism. Journalism Studies, 10(6): 821–836.
44.
TurnerF (2005) Where the counterculture met the new economy: The well and the origins of the virtual economy. Technology and Culture46: 485–512.
45.
UsherN (2011) Professional journalists – hands off! citizen journalism as civic responsibility. In: McChesneyRPickardV (eds) Will The Last Reporter Please Turn Out the Lights?: The Collapse of Journalism and What Can Be Done to Fix It. New York: The New Press, pp. 264–276.
46.
UsherN (2014) Making News at The New York Times. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
47.
UsherN (2016) Interactives Journalism: Hackers, Data, and Code. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
48.
WaisbordS (2013) Reinventing Professionalism: Journalism and News in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Polity.
49.
WardleCWilliamsA (2010) Beyond user-generated content: A production study examining the ways in which UGC is used at the BBC. Media, Culture & Society32(5): 781–799.
50.
WilliamsAWardleCWahl-JorgensenK (2011) ‘Have they got news for us?’ Audience revolution or business as usual at the BBC?Journalism Practice5(1): 85–99.
51.
ZeissRGroenewegenP (2009) Engaging boundary objects in OMS and STS? Exploring the subtleties of layered engagement. Organization16(1): 81–100.
