This exploratory study examined a news episode in a single market as a case study aimed at teasing out elements associated with journalism and audience convergence. This study found four conditions present when the audience converged. The conditions were a spark, or ignition event, that has the potential to arouse dialogue, journalism that makes the broader public aware of such an event, a sufficient mass of audience commentary to create debate, and a channel through which the debate can occur. This process represents a convergence of different public spheres, where audiences overlap and interact across platforms, taking with them bits and pieces from other public spheres to create a new one, a converged conversation. Further, this study found that audience convergence stayed within the confines of the journalism channels that offered initial coverage of the event, suggesting journalism as a key element in the creation of such a space, but, once created, journalism is no longer the curator.
AnannyMKreissD (2011) A new contract for the press: Copyright, public domain journalism, and self-governance in a digital age. Critical Studies In Media Communication28(4): 314–333.
3.
AvilésJCarvajalM (2008) Integrated and cross-media newsroom convergence: Two models of multimedia news production – The cases of Novotécnica and La Verdad multimedia in Spain. Convergence: The Journal Of Research Into New Media Technologies14(2): 221–239.
BerlandJ (1990) Radio space and industrial time: Music formats, local narratives and technological mediation. Popular Music9(2): 179–192.
6.
BlochR (2006) Setting the public sphere in motion: The rhetoric of political bumper stickers in Israel. Political Communication17(4): 433–456.
7.
BoggsCDirmannT (1999) The myth of electronic populism: Talk radio and the decline of the public sphere. Democracy and Nature: The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy5(1): 65.
BrinCSoderlundW (2010) Innovating in a crisis: Canadian media actors assess the state of convergence. Canadian Journal Of Communication35(4): 575–583.
10.
CarpentierN (2011) Contextualising author-audience convergences. Cultural Studies25(4/5): 517–533.
11.
ChongDDruckmanJ (2007) Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science10: 103–126.
12.
CollinsSBrownT (2012) Convergence or business as usual? Comparing new media use at television stations and newspapers. Atlantic Journal Of Communication20(4): 248–260.
13.
CurranJ (1997) Rethinking the media as the public sphere. In: DalhgrenPSparksC (eds) Communication and Citizenship: Journalism and the Public Sphere. New York: Routledge, pp. 27–56.
14.
DonsbachW (2014) Journalism as the new knowledge profession and consequences for journalism education. Journalism15(6): 661–677.
15.
DuheSMortimerMChowSS (2004) Convergence in North American TV newsrooms: A nationwide look. Convergence: The Journal of Research into New Media Technologies10(2): 81–104.
16.
EisenhardtK (2002) Building theories from case study research. In: HubermanAMilesM (eds) Qualitative Researchers Companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 5–36.
17.
EntmanR (1989) How the media affect what people think: An information processing approach. Journal of Politics51(2): 347.
18.
EwartJ (2014) Local people, local places, local voices and local spaces: How talkback radio in Australia provides hyper-local news through mini-narrative sharing. Journalism15(6): 790–807.
Fuente-CoboCMartinez-OteroJDel-Prado-FloresR (2014) Active audiences in the regulation of the audiovisual media: Consumer versus citizen in Spain and Mexico. Comunicar22(43): 91–98.
21.
FürsichE (2009) In defense of textual analysis. Journalism Studies10(2): 238–252.
22.
García-AvilésJKaltenbrunnerAMeierK (2014) Media convergence revisited. Journalism Practice8(5): 573–584.
23.
GeorgeABennettA (2004) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
24.
GitlinT (1980) The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the Making & Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
HabermasJ (1989 [1969]) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
26.
HabermasJ (1984) Theory of Communicative Action, McCarthyT (Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
27.
HabermasJDerridaJ (2003) February 15, or what binds Europeans together: A plea for a common foreign policy, beginning in the core of Europe. Constellations: An International Journal of Critical & Democratic Theory10(33): 291–297.
28.
HarlowS (2013) It was a ‘Facebook revolution’: Exploring the meme-like spread of narratives during the Egyptian protests. Revista De Comunicación12: 59–82.
29.
HassounD (2014) Tracing attentions: Toward an analysis of simultaneous media use. Television & New Media15(4): 271–288.
30.
HerkmanJ (2012) Convergence or intermediality? Finnish political communication in the new media age. Convergence: The Journal Of Research Into New Media Technologies18(4): 369–384.
HuangEDavisonKShreveS. (2006) Facing the challenges of convergence. Convergence: The Journal Of Research Into New Media Technologies12(1): 83–98.
33.
JenkinsH (2008) Convergence Culture. Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
34.
JunXHelinL (2012) Online discussion of Sharon stone's karma comment on China earthquake: The intercultural communication of media events in the age of media convergence. China Media Research8(1): 25–39.
35.
KeaneJ (1995) Structural transformations of the public sphere. Communication Review1(1): 1–22.
36.
KnoblochSPatzigGMendeA. (2004) Affective news: Effects of discourse structure in narratives on suspense, curiosity, and enjoyment while reading news and novels. Communication Research31: 259–287
37.
KraeplinCBatsellJ (2013) Web-centric convergence replaces media partnerships. Newspaper Research Journal34(4): 68–82.
LuntPStennerP (2005) The jerry springer show as an emotional public sphere. Media & Culture27(1): 59–81.
40.
MacekJ (2013) More than a desire for text: Online participation and the social curation of content. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies19(3): 295–302.
41.
MacGregorP (2014) Siren songs or path to salvation? Interpreting the visions of web technology at a UK regional newspaper in crisis, 2006–2011. Convergence: The Journal Of Research Into New Media Technologies20(2): 157–175.
42.
MarkCCheeverNRosenL. (2009) Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans. Computers in Human Behavior25(2): 483–489.
43.
OwczarskiK (2012) From austin’s basement to Hollywood’s back door: The rise of ain’t it cool news and convergence culture. Journal Of Film & Video64(3): 3–20.
44.
PapacharissiZ (2004) Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society6(2): 259–283.
Quintas-FroufeNGonzalez-NeiraA (2014) Active audiences: Social audience participation in television. Comunicar22(43): 83–90.
47.
SotilloSStarace-NastasiD (1999) Political discourse of a working-class town. Discourse & Society10(2): 249–276.
48.
SteemersJ (2004) Building a digital cultural commons the example of the BBC. Convergence: The Journal Of Research Into New Media Technologies10(3): 102–107.
49.
SundetVYtrebergE (2009) Working notions of active audiences: Further research on the active participant in convergent media industries. Convergence: The Journal of Research into New Media Technologies15(4): 383–390.
50.
SzécsiG (2013) Social and linguistic convergences in the information age. Canadian Journal of Communication38(4): 639–648.
51.
The Missouri Group (2010) News Reporting and Writing. In: BrooksBKennedyGMoenDRanlyD (eds). New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
52.
ThorntonB (2011) Rejecting the eloquence of hate: 1972 magazine letters to the editor. Journal of Magazine & New Media Research12(2): 1–25.
53.
ThorntonB (2014) The ‘dangerous’ Chicago defender. Journalism History40(1): 40–50.
54.
ThurmanN (2011) Making ‘The daily me’: Technology, economics and habit in the mainstream assimilation of personalized news. Journalism12(4): 395–415.
Van DijckJ (2012) Facebook as a tool for producing sociality and connectivity. Television & New Media13(2): 160–176.
57.
Van LeuvenSDeprezARaeymaeckersK (2014) Towards more balanced news access? A study on the impact of cost-cutting and Web 2.0 on the mediated public sphere. Journalism15(7): 850–867.
58.
VulteeV (2012) Man-child in the white house. Journalism Studies13(1): 54–70.
59.
Wahl-JorgensenKGalperinH (2000) Discourse ethics and the regulation of the media: The case of the U.S. newspaper. Journal of Communication Inquiry24(1): 19–40.
60.
WhitemanN (2009) The de/stabilization of identity in online fan communities. Convergence: The Journal Of Research Into New Media Technologies15(4): 391–410.
61.
WitschgeT (2008) Examining online public discourse in context: A mixed method approach. Javnost-The Public15(2): 75–91.
