New communication technologies bring about new ways for political groups and movements to mobilize and organize. A consequence of this might be that established interpretations of and attitudes towards social movements may have to be revisited, for example, when it comes to their internal constitution and their modes of working. This interview case study looks at the digital activist cluster Telecomix and its interventions during the Arab Spring. The study addresses how the network used technological and communicational infrastructures and platforms and how it was organizationally affected by these. By using concepts such as ‘one media bias’, ‘media ecology’, ‘hybridity’ and ‘cognitive praxis’, the article aims to conceptualize how the identity of a movement and its technological infrastructure mutually constitute each other.
AnduizaECristanchoCSabucedoJ (2013) Mobilization through online social networks: The political protest of the Indignados in Spain. Information, Communication & Society. Epub ahead of print 18 June 2013. DOI:10.1080/1369118X.2013.808360.
BassetC (2013) Silence, delirium, lies? In: LovinkGRaschM (eds) Unlike Us Reader: Social Media Monopolies and Their Alternatives. Amsterdam: Institute of Network cultures, pp. 146–158.
4.
BennetWLSegerbergA (2012) The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 739–768.
5.
BimberB (2000) The study of information technology and civic engagement. Political Communication17(4): 329–333.
6.
BimberBFlanaginAJStohlC (2005) Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory15(4): 365–388.
7.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
8.
CammaertsB (2007) Activism and media. In: CammaertsBCarpentierN (eds) Reclaiming the Media: Communication Rights and Democratic Media Roles. Bristol: Intellect Books, pp. 217–224.
9.
CastellsM (2000) The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
CastellsM (2007) Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication1: 238–266
11.
ColemanG (2011) Hacker politics and publics. Public Culture23(6): 511–516.
Della PortaDMoscaL (2005) Global-net for global movements? A network of networks for a movement of movements. Journal of Public Policy25(1): 165–190.
17.
De Souza e SilvaA (2006) From cyber to hybrid mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture9(3): 261–278.
18.
EarlJ (2006) Pursuing social change online: The use of four protest tactics on the internet. Social Science Computer Review24(3): 362–377.
19.
EarlJKimportK (2011) Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
20.
EyermanRJamisonA (1991) Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Polity press.
21.
EyermanRJamisonA (2005) Sociala Rörelser I En Ny Tid. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
22.
FuchsC (2012) Some reflections on manuel castells’ book ‘networks of outrage and hope. social movements in the internet age’. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique10(2): 775–797.
23.
FullerM (2005) Media Ecologies: Materialist Energies in Art and Technoculture. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
24.
GarcelonM (2006) The ‘Indymedia’ experiment: The internet as movement facilitator against institutional control. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies12(1): 55–82.
25.
GerbaudoP (2012) The Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London: Pluto press.
HarlowS (2012) Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline. New Media Society14(2): 225–243.
JamisonA (2006) Social movements and science: Cultural appropriations of cognitive praxis. Science as Culture15(1): 45–59.
34.
JenkinsH (2008) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. NewYork: New York University Press.
35.
JordanT (2002) Activism!: Direct Action, Hacktivism and the Future of Society. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.
36.
JordanTTaylorPA (2004) Hacktivism and Cyberwars: Rebels with a Cause?London: Routledge.
37.
JoyceM (2010) Introduction: How to think about digital activism. In: JoyceM (ed) Digital Activism Decoded: The New Mechanics of Change. New York: International Debate Education Association, pp. 1–14.
38.
JoyceM (2013) Time to adapt: Analog theory meets digital activism. In: Meta-activism blog. Available at: http://www.meta-activism.org(accessed 20 September 2013).
39.
JurisJ (2004) Networked social movements: Global movements for global justice. In: CastellsM (ed) The Network Society: A Cross-cultural Perspective. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 341–362.
40.
JurisJ (2005) The new digital media and activist networking within anti–corporate globalization movements. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science597(1): 189–208.
41.
JurgensonN (2012) When atoms meet bits: Social media, the mobile web and augmented revolution. Future Internet4(1): 83–91.
42.
KahnRKellnerD (2005) Oppositional politics and the internet: A critical/reconstructive approach. Cultural Politics1(1): 75–100.
KiddD (2003) Indymedia.org: A new communications commons. In: McCaugheyMAyersM (eds) Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 47–70.
45.
KluitenbergE (2006) The network of waves: Living and acting in a hybrid space. Open11: 6–16.
46.
KluitenbergE (2011) Legacies of Tactical Media: The Tactics of Occupation: From Tompkins Square to Tahrir. Amsterdam: Institute of network cultures.
47.
LievrouwL (2011) Alternative and Activist New Media. Cambridge: Polity press.
48.
LimM (2012) Clicks, cabs and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt 2004-2011. Journal of Communication62(2): 231–248.
49.
Lindgren S & Linde J (2012) The subpolitics of online piracy: A Swedish case study. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies18(2): 143–164.
50.
LindgrenS (2013a) New Noise: A Cultural Sociology of Digital Disruption. New York: Peter Lang.
51.
LindgrenS (2013b) (ed) Hybrid Media Culture: Sensing Place in a World of Flows. London: Routledge.
52.
LindgrenS (2013c) The potential and limitations of twitter activism: Mapping the 2011 libyan uprising. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique11(1): 207–220.
53.
LindgrenSLundströmR (2011) Pirate culture and hacktivist mobilization: The cultural and social protocols of #wikileaks on Twitter. New Media & Society13(6): 999–1018.
54.
LotanGGraeffEAnannyM. (2011) The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International journal of communication5: 1375–1405.
55.
LovinkG (2013) A world beyond Facebook: Introduction to the unlike us reader. In: LovinkGRaschM (eds) Unlike Us Reader: Social Media Monopolies and Their Alternatives. Amsterdam: Institute of Network cultures, pp. 9–15.
MairederASchwarzeneggerC (2011) A movement of connected individuals: Social media in the Austrian student protests 2009. Information, Communication & Society15(2): 171–195.
58.
McCaugheyMAyersM (2003) Introduction. In: McCaugheyMAyersM (eds) Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
MerceaD (2013) Probing the implications of Facebook use for the organizational form of social movement organizations. Information, Communication & Society16(8): 1306–1327.
61.
MeikleG (2002) Future Active: Media Activism and the Internet. London: Routledge.
62.
MeikleG (2010) Intercreativity: Mapping online activism. In HunsingerJKlastrupLAllenM (eds) International Handbook of Internet Research. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 363–379.
63.
MorozovE (2009) Iran: Downside to the ‘Twitter Revolution’. Dissent56(4): 10–14.
64.
MorozovE (2011) The Net Delusion: How not to Liberate the World. London: Allen Lane.
65.
PenneyJDadasC (2013) (Re) Tweeting in the service of protest: Digital composition and circulation in the occupy wall street movement. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 15 March 2013. DOI:10.1177/1461444813479593.
PostigoH (2012) The Digital Rights Movement: The Role of Technology in Subverting Digital Copyright. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
68.
PostmanN (2000) The humanism of media ecology. Keynote Address Delivered at the Inaugural Media Ecology Association Convention. 16–17June 2000, Fordham University, New York.
69.
PostmesTBrunstingS (2002) Collective action in the age of the Internet: Mass communication and online mobilization. Social Science Computer Review20(3): 290–301.
70.
RheingoldH (2002) Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Cambridge: Perseus Books.
71.
SegerbergABennettWL (2011) Social media and the organization of collective action: Using Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. The Communication Review14(3): 197–215.
72.
ShirkyC (2009) Here Comes Everybody. How Change Happens When People Come Together. London: Penguin Books.
73.
StrateL (2008) Studying media as media: McLuhan and the media ecology approach. Media Tropes1(1): 127–142.
TheocharisY (2013) The wealth of (Occupation) networks? Communication patterns and information distribution in a Twitter protest network. Journal of Information Technology & Politics10(1): 35–56.
76.
TreréE (2012) Social movements as information ecologies: Exploring the coevolution of multiple internet technologies for activism. International Journal of Communication6: 2359–2377.
TufekciZ (2013) “Not this one”: Social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism. American Behavioral Scientist57(7): 848–870.
79.
WilsonCDunnA (2011) Digital media in the Egyptian revolution: Descriptive analysis from the tahrir data sets. International Journal of Communication5: 1248–1272.
