Ensuring a sustainable and efficient transportation system meeting visitor mobility needs is paramount for mass tourist destinations. Recognising this challenge, some destinations are embracing Mobility as a Service (MaaS) solutions as a strategy to create a more sustainable transportation system for tourists. This study uses a discrete choice experiment to analyse tourists’ preferences and willingness to pay for MaaS packages in two well-known municipalities of the Canary Islands, one of Europe’s premier mass tourism destinations. The empirical evidence of taste heterogeneity revealed by the analysis indicates that a one-size-fits-all solution is inadequate. Therefore, the development of mobility packages must be tailored to the specific needs of distinct tourist segments. This approach caters to individual preferences and maximises the perceived value for each tourist segment, promoting the adoption of sustainable transportation options.
AlyavinaENikitasANjoyaET (2022) Mobility as a service (MaaS): a thematic map of challenges and opportunities. Research in Transportation Business and Management43: 100783.
2.
Bahamonde-BirkeFJFrowijnLvan GilsC, et al. (2023) Am I willing to replace my car with a MaaS subscription? An analysis of the willingness of Dutch citizens to adopt MaaS and the triggers affecting their choices. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice176: 103816.
3.
BerniniCEmiliSViciL (2021) Are mass tourists sensitive to sustainability?Tourism Economics27(7): 1375–1397.
4.
BliemerMCRoseJM (2006) Designing stated choice experiments: state-of-the-art. In: Paper presented at the 11th international conference on travel behaviour research, Kyoto, Japan, August 2006.
5.
BliemerMCRoseJM (2010) Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological44(6): 720–734.
6.
Boto-GarcíaDMarielPPinoJB, et al. (2022) Tourists’ willingness to pay for holiday trip characteristics: a discrete choice experiment. Tourism Economics28(2): 349–370.
7.
ButlerLYigitcanlarTPazA (2021) Barriers and risks of Mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) adoption in cities: a systematic review of the literature. Cities109(October 2020): 103036.
8.
CaiatiVRasouliSTimmermansH (2020) Bundling, pricing schemes and extra features preferences for mobility as a service: sequential portfolio choice experiment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice131: 123–148.
9.
ChangJSChoSYLeeBS, et al. (2012) A dichotomous choice survey for quantifying option and non-use values of bus services in Korea. Transportation39: 33–54.
10.
ChenCFFuCChenYC (2023) Exploring tourist preference for Mobility-as-a-service (MaaS)–A latent class choice approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice174: 103750.
11.
ChoiceMetrics (2018) Ngene 1.2. User manual and reference guide. The Cutting Edge in Experimental Design, Retrieved from: https://www.choice-metrics.com/.
12.
CurtaleRSarmanIEvlerJ (2024) Traffic congestion in rural tourist areas and sustainable mobility services. The case of ticino (Switzerland) valleys. Tourism Planning and Development21(1): 70–94.
13.
DaouSLeurentF (2024) Modelling mobility as a service: a literature review. Economics of Transportation39(July): 100368.
14.
DavenportJDavenportJL (2006) The impact of tourism and personal leisure transport on coastal environments: a review. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science67(1–2): 280–292.
15.
DomencichTAMcFaddenD (1975) Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioural Analysis. Amsterdam: North Holland.
16.
DžupkaPDrábRGrófM, et al. (2024) Exploring willingness to pay across different passenger traits. Sustainability16(2): 548.
17.
EckhardtJNykänenLAapaojaA, et al. (2018) MaaS in rural areas-case Finland. Research in Transportation Business & Management27: 75–83.
18.
Esztergár-KissDKerényiT (2020) Creation of mobility packages based on the MaaS concept. Travel Behaviour and Society21: 307–317.
19.
FiorezeTDe GruijterMGeursK (2019) On the likelihood of using mobility-as-a-service: a case study on innovative mobility services among residents in the Netherlands. Case Studies on Transport Policy7(4): 790–801.
GalíN (2022) Impacts of COVID-19 on local tour guides. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change20(6): 788–805.
22.
GreeneWH (2016) Nlogit Version 6.0 Reference Guide. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software, Inc.
23.
HeikkiläS (2014) Mobility as a Service-A Proposal for Action for the Public Administration, Case Helsinki. Master's thesis. Espoo, Finland: Aalto University.
24.
HensherDA (2022) The reason MaaS is such a challenge: a note. Transport Policy129(April): 137–139.
25.
HensherDA (2024) The future of mobility as a service. Transportation Planning and Technology47(5): 624–627.
26.
Hernández-MartínRLeón-GonzálezC (2023) Canary islands tourism sustainability. In: Report 2023, Tourism Observatory of the Canary Islands. Spain: Viceconsejería de Turismo del Gobierno de Canarias. DOI: 10.25145/r.2023.05.
27.
HietanenS (2014) ‘Mobility as a service’ – The new transport model? Eurotransport. ITS & Transport Management Supplement12(2): 2–4.
28.
HoCQHensherDAMulleyC, et al. (2018) Potential uptake and willingness-to-pay for mobility as a service (MaaS): a stated choice study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice117: 302–318.
29.
HoCQMulleyCHensherDA (2020) Public preferences for mobility as a service: insights from stated preference surveys. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice131: 70–90.
30.
HoerlerRStünziAPattA, et al. (2020) What are the factors and needs promoting mobility-as-a-service? Findings from the Swiss household energy demand survey (SHEDS). European Transport Research Review12: 1–16.
JangSCaiatiVRasouliS, et al. (2021) Does MaaS contribute to sustainable transportation? A mode choice perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation15(5): 351–363.
34.
KamargianniMMatyasM (2017) The business ecosystem of mobility-as-a-service. In: Transportation research board. Transportation Research Board, Vol. 96.
35.
KamargianniMYfantisLMuscatJ, et al. (2019) Incorporating the mobility as a service concept into transport modelling and simulation frameworks. Special Report-National Research Council, Transportation Research Board.
36.
KimEJKimYJangS, et al. (2021) Tourists’ preference on the combination of travel modes under mobility-as-a-service environment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice150: 236–255.
37.
KriswardhanaWEsztergár-KissD (2023) A systematic literature review of mobility as a service: examining the socio-technical factors in MaaS adoption and bundling packages. Travel Behaviour and Society31: 232–243.
38.
LeungABurkeMScottP (2023) Tourism MaaS–The case for regional cities. Research in Transportation Business and Management49: 101017.
39.
LiWGuanHHanY, et al. (2023) Incorporating habitual effects into mode choice modeling in light of mobility-as-a-service in tourism transport: an empirical analysis in China. Transportation Letters15(9): 1174–1190.
40.
LiljamoTLiimatainenHPöllänenM, et al. (2020) People’s current mobility costs and willingness to pay for mobility as a service offerings. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice136: 99–119.
41.
LyuSO (2021) Applying discrete choice models to understand sport tourists’ heterogeneous preferences for winter olympic travel products. Tourism Economics27(3): 482–499.
42.
MartinčevićIBrlekPDomjan KačarevićN (2022) Mobility as a service (MaaS) as a sustainability concept for tourist destinations. Sustainability14(12): 7512.
43.
MasieroLHensherDA (2010) Analyzing loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity in a freight transport stated choice experiment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice44(5): 349–358.
44.
MatyasMKamargianniM (2019) The potential of mobility as a service bundles as a mobility management tool. Transportation46(5): 1951–1968.
45.
MatyasMKamargianniM (2021) Investigating heterogeneity in preferences for mobility-as-a-service plans through a latent class choice model. Travel Behaviour and Society23: 143–156.
46.
McFaddenD (1981) Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In: ManskiCMcFaddenD (eds) Structural Analysis of Discrete Data: With Econometric Applications. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
47.
Moreira GregoriPERomanCMartínJC (2022) Residents’ perception of a mature and mass tourism destination: the determinant factors in Gran Canaria. Tourism Economics28(2): 515–534.
48.
MustaphaHEOzkanBTüretkenO (2024) Acceptance of mobility-as-a-service: insights from empirical studies on influential factors. Communications in Transportation Research4: 100119.
49.
OrtúzarJde DWillumsenLG (2011) Modelling Transport. 4th edition. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
50.
PeetersPHighamJCohenS, et al. (2019) Desirable tourism transport futures. Journal of Sustainable Tourism27(2): 173–188.
51.
PolydoropoulouATsourosIPagoniI, et al. (2020a) Exploring individual preferences and willingness to pay for mobility as a service. Transportation Research Record2674(11): 152–164.
52.
PolydoropoulouAPagoniITsirimpaA (2020b) Ready for mobility as a service? Insights from stakeholders and end-users. Travel Behaviour and Society21: 295–306.
53.
RotarisLDanielisR (2018) The role for carsharing in medium to small-sized towns and in less-densely populated rural areas. Smart Urban Mobility115: 49–62.
54.
SignorilePLarosaVSpiruA (2018) Mobility as a service: a new model for sustainable mobility in tourism. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes10(2): 185–200.
55.
SillanoMde Dios OrtúzarJ (2005) Willingness-to-pay estimation with mixed logit models: some new evidence. Environment and Planning A37(3): 525–550.
56.
SmithGHensherDA (2020) Towards a framework for mobility-as-a-service policies. Transport Policy89(October 2019): 54–65.
57.
SochorJKarlssonICMStrömbergH (2016) Trying out mobility as a service: experiences from a field trial and implications for understanding demand. Transportation Research Record2542(1): 57–64.
58.
SochorJArbyHKarlssonIM, et al. (2018) A topological approach to mobility as a service: a proposed tool for understanding requirements and effects, and for aiding the integration of societal goals. Research in Transportation Business and Management27: 3–14.
59.
StrömbergHKarlssonICMSochorJ (2018) Inviting travelers to the smorgasbord of sustainable urban transport: evidence from a MaaS field trial. Transportation45(6): 1655–1670.
60.
SureshKWilsonCQuayleA, et al. (2022) Which national park attributes attract international tourists? A Sri Lankan case study. Tourism Economics28(7): 1848–1871.
61.
TrainK (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.
62.
TsourosITsirimpaAPagoniI, et al. (2021) MaaS users: who they are and how much they are willing-to-pay. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice148: 470–480.
63.
VigliaGDolnicarS (2020) A review of experiments in tourism and hospitality. Annals of Tourism Research80: 102858.
64.
VijARyanSSampsonS, et al. (2020) Consumer preferences for mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) in Australia. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies117: 102699.
65.
WanyingLIGuanHHanY, et al. (2022) Understanding consumer preferences for integration between mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) and tourism transport in China.
66.
ZhaoZSunYHeY, et al. (2023) The application potential of mobility as a service (MaaS) at mega events: a case study of Hangzhou 2022 Asian Games. Journal of Cleaner Production427: 139211.
67.
ZhouHChiXNormanR, et al. (2024) Tourists' urban travel modes: choices for enhanced transport and environmental sustainability. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment129: 104144.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
