The paper investigates the efficiency of 103 Italian provinces and some contextual factors that influence the competitiveness of a territorial tourist destination, defined as an ensemble of different historical, economic, environmental, and social traditions. Non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis and semi-parametric bootstrapping extensions are applied over the period 2012-2019. The findings demonstrate that tourism destinations are considerably technically and scale inefficient, and that the total factor productivity is decreasing over time. The results also present a great heterogeneity of Italian provinces regarding their efficiency levels, suggesting that the traditional North-South regional divide of Italy does not apply in the tourism sector. Regarding the role of contextual factors as sources of efficiency gains, the cultural attractions, cultural public expenditures, and the rule of law increase technical efficiency of Italian provinces, whilst provinces with higher income and higher pollution receive negative gains.
AhmadNMaX (2022) How does tourism development affect environmental pollution?Tourism Economics28(6): 1453–1479.
2.
AlgieriBÁlvarezA (2023) Assessing the ability of regions to attract foreign tourists: The case of Italy. Tourism Economics29(3): 788–811.
3.
ApergisNGavriilidisKGuptaR (2023) Does climate policy uncertainty affect tourism demand? Evidence from time-varying causality tests. Tourism Economics29(6): 1484–1498.
4.
BankerRDCharnesACooperWW (1984) Some models for estimation of technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science30(9): 1078–1092.
5.
BankerRNatarajanRZhangD (2019) Two-stage estimation of the impact of contextual variables in stochastic frontier production function models using data envelopment analysis: second stage OLS versus bootstrap approaches. European Journal of Operational Research278(2): 368–384.
6.
BarbieriCMahoneyE (2010) Cultural tourism behaviour and preferences among the live-performing arts audience: an application of the univorous-omnivorous framework. International Journal of Tourism Research12(5): 481–496.
7.
BarrosCPBottiLPeypochNRobinotESolonandrasanaBGeorgeA (2011) Performance of French destinations: tourism attraction perspectives. Tourism Management32: 141–146.
8.
BaumolWBowenWG (1966) Performing arts: the economic dilemma. a study of problems common to theater, opera, music and dance. The Twentieth Century Fund, New York.
9.
BorowieckiKJCastiglioneC (2014) Cultural participation and tourism flows: an empirical investigation of Italian provinces. Tourism Economics20(2): 241–262.
10.
CastiglioneCInfanteDZiebaM (2023) Public support for performing arts. Efficiency and productivity gains in eleven European countries. Socio-Economic Planning Studies85(2): 101444.
11.
CastiglioneCInfanteDZiebaM (2024) Is it worth subsidising the cultural sector? New insights from Italian theatre companies. Journal of Policy Modeling46(1): 20–38.
12.
CharnesACooperERhodesE (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research2(6): 429–444.
13.
ChienFZhangYSharifASadiqMVu HieuM (2023) Does air pollution affect the tourism industry in the USA? Evidence from the quantile autoregressive distributed lagged approach. Tourism Economics29(5): 1164–1180.
14.
CoelliTJRaoDO’DonnellCJBatteseGE (2005) An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. 2nd edition. USA: Springer.
15.
CrouchGIRitchieJRB (1999) Tourism, competitiveness, and societal prosperity. Journal of Business Research44: 137–152.
16.
CucciaTGuccioCRizzoI (2016) The effects of UNESCO world heritage list inscription on tourism destinations performance in Italian regions. Economic Modelling53: 494–508.
17.
CucciaTGuccioCRizzoI (2017) UNESCO sites and performance trend of Italian regional tourism destinations: a two-stage DEA window analysis with spatial interaction. Tourism Economics23(2): 316–342.
18.
DaraioCSimarLWilsonWP (2018) Central limit theorems for conditional efficiency measures and tests of the ‘separability’ condition in non-parametric, two-stage models of production. The Econometrics Journal21: 170–191.
19.
De SimoneECanaleRRDi MaioA (2019) Do UNESCO world heritage sites influence international tourist arrivals? Evidence from Italian provincial data. Social Indicators Research146: 345–359.
FäreRGrosskopfSNorrisMZhangZ (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review84(1): 66–83.
23.
FarrellMJ (1957) The measurement of the productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society120(3): 253–290.
24.
Fernández-BlancoVRodríguez-ÁlvarezAWiśniewskaA (2019) Measuring technical efficiency and marginal costs in the performing arts: the case of the municipal theatres of Warsaw. Journal of Cultural Economics43(1): 97–119.
25.
FigueroaVHerreroLBáezAGómezM (2018) Analysing how cultural factors influence the efficiency of tourist destinations in Chile. International Journal of Tourism Research20(1): 11–24.
26.
Gómez-VegaMHerrero-PrietoLCLópezMV (2022) Clustering and country destination performance at a global scale: determining factors of tourism competitiveness. Tourism Economics28(6): 1605–1625.
27.
GuccioCLisiDMartoranaMMignosaA (2017) On the role of cultural participation in tourism destination performance: an assessment using robust conditional efficiency approach. Journal of Cultural Economics41(2): 129–154.
28.
GuccioCLisiDMignosaA, et al. (2018) Does cultural heritage monetary value have an impact on visits? An assessment using official Italian data. Tourism Economics24(3): 297–318.
29.
Herrero-PrietoLCGómez-VegaM (2017) Cultural resources as a factor in cultural tourism attraction: technical efficiency estimation of regional destinations in Spain. Tourism Economics23(2): 260–280.
30.
ISTAT (2020) Conto satellite del turismo per l’Italia Anno 2017 Rome. Available at:http://dati.istat.it/#(accessed June 2023).
31.
ISTAT (2022a) Capacità degli esercizi ricettivi Rome. Available at:http://dati.istat.it/#(accessed June 2023).
32.
ISTAT (2022b) I bilanci consuntivi delle amministrazioni comunali Rome. Available at:http://dati.istat.it/#(accessed June 2023).
33.
ISTAT (2022c) Principali aggregati territoriali di Contabilità Nazionale Rome. Available at:http://dati.istat.it/#(accessed June 2023).
34.
KneipASimarLWilsonPW (2015) When bias kills the variance: central limit theorems for DEA and FDH efficiency scores. Econometric Theory31(2): 394–422.
Moradi-MotlaghAEmrouznejadA (2022) The origins and development of statistical approaches in non-parametric frontier models: a survey of the first two decades of scholarly literature (1998–2020). Annals of Operations Research318(1): 713–741.
37.
NifoAMVecchioneG (2014) Do institutions play a role in skilled migration? The case of Italy. Regional Studies48(10): 1628–1649.
RichardsGAndries van der ArkL (2013) Dimensions of cultural consumption among tourists: multiple correspondence analysis. Tourism Management37(C): 71–76.
41.
RitchieJRBCrouchGI (2003) The competitive destination, a sustainable perspective. Tourism Management21(1): 1–7.
42.
RitchieJRBCrouchGI (2010) A model of destination competitiveness/sustainability: Brazilian perspectives. Revista de Administração Pública44(5): 1049–1066.
43.
SimarLWilsonPW (1998) Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science44(1): 49–61.
44.
SimarLWilsonPW (2007) Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of productive efficiency. Journal of Econometrics136(1): 31–64.
ZiebaM (2011) An analysis of technical efficiency and efficiency factors for austrian and swiss non-profit theatres. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics147(2): 233–274.
50.
ZiebaM (2017) Cultural participation of tourists – evidence from travel habits of Austrian residents. Tourism Economics23(2): 295–315.
51.
ZiebaM (2019) Global trade in cultural tourism services. In: CameronS (ed). A Research Agenda for Cultural Economics. Cheltenham, UK:: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
