Abstract
Tourism-induced Dutch disease can be particularly detrimental to small open economies due to deindustrialization and potential long-term welfare loss. This study adopts an innovative macroeconomic modelling tool, dynamic stochastic general equilibrium modelling, to investigate the effects of external inbound tourism booms on the national economic account of a small open economy. The results confirm the existence of Dutch disease, but tourism booms also bring welfare gains to the destination country. We further model the effects of two strategies to mitigate the Dutch disease by assuming that the government can tax the tourism sector and subsidize the manufacturing sector in two ways: production subsidies and investment subsidies. The results show that the effectiveness of production subsidies is very modest, while investment subsidies can almost completely overturn the Dutch disease. In terms of welfare, investment subsidies lower welfare gains in the very short term, but the positive effects persist over the longer term, which is different from the production subsidy case. Last, practical implications are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
