Most studies of coalition behavior have treated political parties as unitary actors. Building on extant literature, this paper relaxes the unitary actor assumption in order to develop a theory about the impact of party factionalism on cabinet duration. Specifically, cabinets composed of factionalized parties are expected to exhibit less stability. Cross-national data corroborate the hypothesis, demonstrating the importance of intra-party characteristics in determining coalition behavior.
Alt, James E. and Gary King (1994) `Transfers of Governmental Power: The Meaning of Time Dependence', Comparative Political Studies27: 190-210.
2.
Axelrod, Robert (1970) Conflict of Interest. Chicago, IL: Markham.
3.
Beck, Nathaniel and Jonathan Katz (1992) `Model Assessment via Cross Validation', paper delivered at the annual meeting of the Political Methodology Society, July.
4.
Brehm, John and Scott Gates (1994) `When Supervision Fails to Induce Compliance', Journal of Theoretical Politics6: 323-343.
5.
Browne, Eric C. , John P. Frendreis and Dennis W. Gleiber (1986) `The Process of Cabinet Dissolution: An Exponential Model of Duration and Stability in Western Democracies', American Journal of Political Science30: 628-650.
6.
Cox, Gary W. and Mathew D. McCubbins (1993) Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Daalder, Hans (1983) `The Comparative Study of European Parties and Party Systems: An Overview', in Hans Daalder and Peter Mair (eds) Western European Party Systems. London and Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
Denters, Bas (1985) `Towards a Conditional Model of Coalition Behavior', European Journal of Political Research13: 295-309.
9.
Dodd, Lawrence C. (1976) Coalitions in Parliamentary Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
Duverger, Maurice (1954) Political Parties. New York: Wiley.
11.
Groennings, Sven (1970) `Notes Toward Theories of Coalition Behavior in Multiparty Systems: Formation and Maintenance', in Sven Groennings, E. W. Kelley and Michael Leiserson (eds) The Study of Coalition Behavior: Theoretical Perspectives and Cases from Four Continents. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.
12.
Harmel, Robert , Kenneth Janda, Uk Heo and Alexander Tan (1993) `Performance, Leadership, Factions, and Party Change: An Empirical Analysis', paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC, September.
13.
Janda, Kenneth (1980) Political Parties: A Cross-national Survey. New York: Free Press.
14.
Katz, Richard and Peter Mair, eds (1992) Party Organizations: A Data Handbook. London: Sage.
15.
King, Gary , James E. Alt, Nancy E. Burns and Michael Laver (1990) `A Unified Model of Cabinet Dissolution in Parliamentary Democracies', American Journal of Political Science34: 846-871.
16.
Laver, Michael (1986) `Between Theoretical Elegance and Political Reality: Deductive Models and Cabinet Coalitions in Europe', in Geoffrey Pridham (ed.) Coalitional Behavior in Theory and Practice: An Inductive Model for Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Laver, Michael and W. Ben Hunt (1992) Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.
18.
Laver, Michael and Norman Schofield (1990) Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
Laver, Michael and Kenneth Shepsle (1990) `Government Coalitions and Intraparty Politics', British Journal of Political Science20: 489-507.
20.
Laver, Michael and Kenneth Shepsle, eds (1994) Cabinet Ministers and Parliamentary Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Lijphart, Arend (1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Governments in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Lowell, A. Lawrence (1896) Governments and Parties in Continental Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Luebbert, Gregory (1986) Comparative Democracy: Policy Making and Governing Coalitions in Europe and Israel. New York: Columbia University Press.
24.
Lupia, Arthur and Kaare Strøm (1995) `Coalition Termination and the Strategic Timing of Parliamentary Elections', American Political Science Review89: 648-665.
25.
Maor, Moshe (1992) `Intraparty Conflict and Coalitional Behavior in Denmark and Norway: The Case of “Highly Institutionalized” Parties', Scandinavian Political Studies15: 99-116.
26.
Maor, Moshe (1995) `Intraparty Determinants of Coalition Bargaining', Journal of Theoretical Politics7: 65-91.
27.
Mény, Yves with Andrew Knapp (1993) Government and Politics in Western Europe: Britain, France, Italy, Germany, 2nd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
Michels, Robert (1962) Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Free Press.
29.
Mintz, Alex (1995) `The “Noncompensatory Principle” of Coalitions', Journal of Theoretical Politics7: 335-349.
30.
Panebianco, Angelo (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Pridham, Geoffrey (1986) `An Inductive Theoretical Framework for Coalitional Behavior: Political Parties in Multi-dimensional Perspective in Western Europe', in Geoffrey Pridham (ed.) Coalitional Behavior in Theory and Practice: An Inductive Model for Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Pridham, Geoffrey (1988) Political Parties and Coalitional Behavior in Italy. London: Routledge.
33.
Robertson, David (1976) A Theory of Party Competition. Chichester: Wiley.
34.
Strøm, Kaare (1990) Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Strøm, Kaare (1994a) `Party Leadership in Theory and in Norway: An Entrepreneurial Perspective', in Kay Lawson (ed.) How Political Parties Work: Perspectives from Within. Westport, CT: Praeger.
36.
Strøm, Kaare (1994b) `The Presthus Debacle: Intraparty Politics and Bargaining Failure in Norway', American Political Science Review88: 112-127.
37.
Taylor, Michael and Valentine Herman (1971) `Party Systems and Government Stability', American Political Science Review65: 23-37.
38.
Von Beyme, Klaus (1985) Political Parties in Western Democracies. New York: St Martin's Press.
39.
Warwick, Paul (1992) `Ideological Diversity and Government Survival in Western European Parliamentary Democracies', Comparative Political Studies25: 332-361.
40.
Warwick, Paul V. (1994) Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Zuckerman, Alan (1975) Political Clienteles in Power: Party Factions and Cabinet Coalitions in Italy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
