Did Thailand's multiple parties and factions influence cabinet and coalition durability in the period 1979 to 2001? If so, which one — parties or factions — was the more significant? Taking a Transaction Costs Analysis approach, this article addresses these questions and argues that intra-party factions, as the building blocks of Thai parliamentary politics, have been more important than parties, such that each additional faction in a cabinet triggers a reduction in the longevity of prime ministerial terms and cabinets while affecting the durability of coalitions. Furthermore, while factions tend to shorten parliamentary and cabinet terms, they have the opposite effect on coalition terms. The study suggests that where parties are less cohesive, informal institutions within parties are of considerable importance.
Axelrod, Robert (1970) Conflict of Interest. Chicago, IL: Markham.
2.
Browne, Eric C. , Dennis W. Gleiber and C.S. Mashoba (1984) `Evaluating Conflict of Interest Theory: Western European Coalitions 1945-80' , British Journal of Political Science14: 1-32.
3.
Bryce, Lord James (1921) Modern Democracies, vols I and II. New York: Macmillan.
4.
Chambers, Paul (2001) `Mung Lek Nai Mung Yai: How Factions Matter in Contemporary Thai Politics' , Chulalongkorn University: Journal of Social Sciences32: 192-230.
5.
Chambers, Paul (2003) Factions, Parties, Coalition Change, and Cabinet Durability in Thailand: 1979-2001 (Dissertation). DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University.
6.
Chambers, Paul (2006) `Has Everything Changed in Thai Politics Under Thaksin ?' Crossroads17: 7-33.
7.
Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio (1984) `The Political Reliability of Italian Governments' , American Political Science Review78: 318-37.
8.
Dodd, Lawrence C. (1976) Coalitions in Parliamentary Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
9.
Druckman, James (1996) `Party Factionalism and Cabinet Durability' , Party Politics2: 397-407.
10.
Duverger, Maurice (1954) Political Parties. London: Methuen.
11.
Groennings, Sven (1970) `Notes Toward Theories of Coalition Behavior in Multiparty Systems: Formation and Maintenance', in Sven Groennings , E. W. Kelly and M. Leisersen (eds) The Study of Coalition Behavior: Theoretical Perspectives and Cases from Four Continents , pp. 445-65. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
12.
Khamnurakhasa, Nirujana (2000) A Study of Factions Within the Thai Political Party System (Master's Thesis). NIDA .
13.
King, Daniel Evan (1996) `New Political Parties in Thailand: A Case Study of the Palang Dharma Party and the New Aspiration Party' (PhD dissertation). University of Wisconsin-Madison .
14.
King, Gary , James E. Alt , Nancy E. Burns and Michael Laver (1990) `A Unified Model of Cabinet Dissolution in Parliamentary Democracies' , American Journal of Political Science34: 846-71.
15.
Kramol Tongdhammachart (1982) Toward a Political Party Theory in Thai Perspective . ISEAS Occasional Paper No. 68. Singapore: Maruzen Asia.
16.
Laakso, M. and R. Taagepera (1979) `Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to Western Europe' , Comparative Political Studies12: 3-27.
17.
Laski, Harold J. (1938) Parliamentary Government in England. New York: Viking Press.
18.
Laver, Michael and Kenneth Shepsle (1996) Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies, p. 247. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Lertsukekasem, Boontham (1988) Factionalism in the Social Action, Democrat, and Chart Thai Parties (Dissertation). Chulalongkorn University. Faculty of Political Science .
20.
Lowell, A. Lawrence (1896) Governments and Parties in Continental Europe, vols I and II. London: Longmans Green.
21.
Luebbert, Gregory (1986) Comparative Democracy: Policymaking and Governing Coalitions in Europe and Israel, p. 170. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
Maor, Moshe (1998) Parties, Conflicts, and Coalitions in Western Europe: Organizing Determinants of Coalitional Bargaining. London : Routledge.
23.
McCargo, Duncan (1997) `Thailand's Political Parties: Real, Authentic, and Actual', in Kevin Hewison (ed.) Political Change in Thailand: Democracy and Participation, pp. 114-31. London : Routledge.
24.
Mershon, Carol (2001) `Party Factions and Coalition Government: Portfolio Allocation in Italian Christian Democracy' , Electoral Studies20: 555-80.
25.
Nelson, Michael (2005) `Analyzing Provincial Political Structures in Thailand: phuak, trakun, and hua khanaen' (SEARC Working Paper Series, No. 78, www.cityu.edu.hk/searc). Hong Kong: Southeast Asia Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong.
26.
North, Douglas (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Ockey, James (1994) `Political Parties, Factions, and Corruption in Thailand' , Modern Asian Studies28: 251-74.
28.
Ockey, James (2003) `Change and Continuity in the Thai Political Party System' , Asian Survey43: 663-80.
29.
Pongphaew, Pornsak (1998) The Role of Thai Political Parties in Governing Coalitions. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
30.
Rae, Douglas (1967) The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
Sajjayan, Jitsiri (1997) Fragmentation of Political Parties in the Coalition Governments of Chuan and Banharn (Master's Thesis). Chulalongkorn University .
32.
Simon, Herbert A. (1961) Administrative Behavior. New York: Macmillan.
33.
Sutranan, Piyasak (1991) An Academic Analysis of Political Party Members Playing a Role in Intra-Party Factions (Thesis). Thammasat University .
34.
Taagepera, Rein and Arend Lijphart (1988) `The Inverse Square Law of Coalition Durability' . Unpublished ms.
35.
Taagepera, Rein and Matthew Shugart (1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36.
Williamson, Oliver (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, pp. 45-9. New York: Free Press.
