Populist and social democrat parties often claim to better represent lower socio-economic status (SES) citizens, yet existing research shows their elected politicians are mostly socio-economically privileged. This study asks whether these politicians nonetheless maintain closer personal ties to lower SES individuals, focusing on politicians’ intimate relationships such as parents, partners, and close friends. Using original survey data from 1185 politicians across 13 countries, we find limited evidence that populists and socialists are better in touch, through their ties, with lower SES individuals. Populists and socialists are more likely than other politicians to come from lower-class families, and social democrats more often have lower-educated parents. However, both groups are just as likely as other politicians to have highly educated and higher-class friends and partners. A notable exception is that populists are somewhat more likely to have a lower-educated partner. Overall, despite their rhetoric, intimate ties to lower SES groups remain limited among populists and socialists.
BarnesTDSaxtonGW (2019) Working-class legislators and perceptions of representation in Latin America. Political Research Quarterly72(4): 910–928.
2.
BarnesTDBeallVDHolmanMR (2021) Pink-collar representation and budgetary outcomes in US states. Legislative Studies Quarterly46: 119–154.
3.
BenedettoGHixSMastroroccoN (2020) The rise and fall of social democracy, 1918–2017. American Political Science Review114(3): 928–939.
4.
BermanSSnegovayaM (2019) Opulism and the decline of social democracy. Journal of Democracy30(3): 5–19.
5.
BestHCottaM (eds) (2000) Parliamentary Representatives in Europe. OUP, 1848–2000.
6.
BinderJFRobertsSGBSutcliffeAG (2012) Closeness, loneliness, support: core ties and significant ties in personal communities. Social Networks34(2): 206–214.
7.
BonikowskiBHalikiopoulouDKaufmannE, et al. (2019) Populism and nationalism in a comparative perspective: a scholarly exchange. Nations and Nationalism25(1): 58–81.
8.
BortunVReevesAFriedmanS (2024) “We didn’t know what we were eating tomorrow”: how class origin shapes the political outlook of members of the parliament in Britain. Political Studies73: 612–630.
9.
BovensMWilleA (2017) Diploma Democracy: The Rise of Political Meritocracy. Oxford University Press.
10.
CarnesNLupuN (2015) Rethinking the comparative perspective on class and representation: evidence from Latin America. American Journal of Political Science59(1): 1–18.
11.
CarnesNLupuN (2023a) The economic backgrounds of politicians. Annual Review of Political Science26: 253–270.
12.
CarnesNLupuN (2023b) Working-class officeholding in the OECD. In: LupuNoamPontussonJonas (eds). Unequal Democracies: Public Policy, Responsiveness, and Redistribution in an Era of Rising Economic Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 177–195.
13.
DahlgaardJOPedersenRT (2024) Inclusive meritocracy: ability and descriptive representation among Danish politicians. Political Science Research and Methods13: 567–590.
14.
Dal BóEFinanFFolkeO, et al. (2017) Who becomes A politician?Quarterly Journal of Economics132(4): 1877–1914.
15.
Dal BóEFinanFFolkeO, et al. (2023) Economic and social outsiders but political insiders: sweden’s populist radical right. The Review of Economic Studies90(2): 675–706.
16.
DassonnevilleRMcAllisterI (2023) Are they different? A comparative study of European populist party members. Party Politics29(1): 16–25.
17.
DavisJLRusbultCE (2001) Attitude alignment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81(1): 65–84.
18.
De CleenBRuiz CasadoJA (2024) Populism of the privileged: on the use of underdog identities by comparatively privileged groups. Political Studies72(3): 1005–1025.
19.
DehdariSHMatakosKMeriläinenJ, et al. (2022) A pink slip for the blue reform: is selection, experience, or ideology the elixir of populists’ survival?Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy3(1): 1–21.
20.
DunbarRIM (2021) Friends: Understanding the Power of Our Most Important Relationships. Little, Brown.
21.
ElsässerL (2024) Careerism and working-class decline: the role of party selectorates in explaining trends in descriptive (Mis-)Representation. Electoral Studies89: 102788.
22.
FolkeORickneJ (2025) The class ceiling in politics. American Political Science Review119(3): 1375–1392.
23.
GerringJOncelEMorrisonK, et al. (2019) Who rules the world? A portrait of the global leadership class. Perspectives on Politics17(4): 1079–1097.
24.
GingrichJHäusermannS (2015) The decline of the working-class vote, the reconfiguration of the welfare support coalition and consequences for the welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy25(1): 50–75.
25.
GrigoriadisINCanpolatIE (2024) Elite universities as populist scapegoats: evidence from Hungary and Turkey. East European Politics & Societies38(2): 432–454.
26.
GulzarS (2021) Who enters politics and why?Annual Review of Political Science24: 253–275.
27.
HanSMHanK (2021) Political leaders, economic hardship, and redistribution in democracies: impact of political leaders on welfare policy. Political Studies69(4): 921–943.
28.
HäusermannSKitscheltH (eds) (2024) Beyond Social Democracy: The Transformation of the Left in Emerging Knowledge Societies. Cambridge University Press.
29.
HeinischRWernerA (2019) Who do populist radical right parties stand for? Representative claims, claim acceptance and descriptive representation in the Austrian FPÖ and German AfD. Representation55(4): 475–492.
30.
HelgasonAFRehmP (2023) Long-term income trajectories and the evolution of political attitudes. European Journal of Political Research62: 264–284.
31.
HellemansS (2020) Pillarization (“Verzuiling”). On organized “Self-Contained Worlds” in the modern world. The American Sociologist51(2): 124–147.
32.
JagersJWalgraveS (2007) Populism as political communication style: an empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 319–345.
33.
JoshiDK (2015) The inclusion of excluded majorities in South Asian parliaments: women, youth, and the working class. Journal of Asian and African Studies50(2): 223–238.
34.
JuniusNWalgraveS (2025) Are elected representatives’ intimate ties representative? Examining their socio-economic status in 13 countries.European Journal of Political Research1–23. doi: 10.1017/S1475676525100042.
35.
KitscheltHPRehmP (2023) Polarity reversal: the socioeconomic reconfiguration of partisan support in knowledge societies. Politics & Society51(4): 520–566.
36.
KokkonenAKarlssonD (2017) That's what friends are for: how intergroup friendships promote historically disadvantaged groups’ substantive political representation. British Journal of Sociology68: 693–717.
37.
LupuNWarnerZ (2022) Affluence and congruence: unequal representation around the world. The Journal of Politics84(1): 276–290.
38.
MansbridgeJ (1999) Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes.”. The Journal of Politics61(3): 628–657. doi: 10.2307/2647821.
39.
MatthewsASKerevelYP (2022) The nomination and electoral competitiveness of working class candidates in Germany. German Politics31(3): 459–475.
40.
MazzoleniOPilottiAAnselmiM (2023) Right-wing populism against diploma democracy. The evolution of parliamentary elites in Austria, Italy, and Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review29(2): 181–201.
41.
MuddeCRovira KaltwasserCR (2013) Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition48(2): 147–174.
42.
NeundorfASmetsK (2017) Political Socialization and the Making of Citizens. Oxford Handbooks Online.
43.
NewmanBJ (2014) My poor friend: financial distress in one’s social network, the perceived power of the rich, and support for redistribution. The Journal of Politics76(1): 126–138.
44.
NorrisPLovenduskiJ (1995) Political Recruitment: Gender, Race, and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge University Press.
45.
O’GradyT (2018) Careerists versus coal-miners: welfare reforms and the substantive representation of social groups in the British labour party. Comparative Political Studies52(4): 544–578.
46.
PettigrewTF (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology49(1): 65–85.
47.
PhillipsA (2020) Descriptive representation revisited. In: RohrschneiderRobertThomassenJacques (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Political Representation in Liberal Democracies. Oxford University Press, 175–191.
48.
ReevesAFriedmanS (2024) Born to Rule: The Making and Remaking of the British Elite. Harvard University Press.
49.
RennwaldL (2020) Social Democratic Parties and the Working Class: New Voting Patterns. Springer Nature.
50.
RooduijnMBurgoonBvan ElsasEJ, et al. (2017) Radical distinction: support for radical left and radical right parties in Europe. European Union Politics18(4): 536–559.
51.
RooduijnMPirroALPHalikiopoulouD, et al. (2024) The PopuList: a database of populist, far-left, and far-right parties using expert-informed qualitative comparative classification (EiQCC). British Journal of Political Science54(3): 969–978.
52.
SmithDM (2018) Dynasties and Democracy: The Inherited Incumbency Advantage in Japan. Stanford University Press.
53.
SpruytBKeppensGVan DroogenbroeckF (2016) Who supports populism and what attracts people to it?Political Research Quarterly69(2): 335–346.
54.
StokerLJenningsMK (2005) Political similarity and influence between husbands and wives. In: ZuckermanAS (ed) The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior. Temple University Press, 51–74.
55.
TarditiVVittoriD (2021) 'We are different’: do anti-establishment parties promote distinctive elites? An analysis of the Spanish case. Representation57(1): 21–39.
56.
ThompsonDMFeigenbaumJHallA, et al. (2019) Who becomes a member of congress? Evidence from De-Anonymized census data. Working Paper 26156, DOI: 10.3386/w26156, accessed on 27 March 2024.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
