Populist Radical Right parties (PRR) have gained prominence in many European countries, with leadership often considered a key factor in their electoral success. Despite this, limited research has explored how voters’ perceptions of leaders’ traits influence support for PRR parties. This study delves into the impact of perceived leaders’ traits on the vote for PRR parties, using original survey data collected during recent general elections in six European countries (Italy 2022, France 2017, Germany 2017, Austria 2017, UK 2017, Netherlands 2017). Combining descriptive findings and regression analyses, our results reveal three key insights: (1) Voters differentiate among leaders’ traits, with the influence of each trait varying across different party types; (2) the effect of leader’s perceptions on all traits is significant also after taking into account party identification; (3) PRR parties are particularly adept at attracting voters based on positive assessments of leaders’ strength and empathy, more so than other party types.
AalderingL (2018) The (ir) rationality of mediated leader effects. Electoral Studies54: 269–280.
2.
AardalBBinderT (2011) Leader effects and party characteristics. In: AartsKBlaisASchmittH (eds) Political Leaders and Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 108–126.
3.
AdornoTWElseF-BDanielJL (1969) The Authoritarian Personality. New York: W.W. Norton.
4.
AkkermanAMuddeCZasloveA (2014) How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies47(9): 1324–1353.
5.
BittnerA (2011) Platform or Personality? the Role of Party Leaders in Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
ChiaramonteADe SioL (2024) Un polo solo. Le elezioni politiche del 2024. Bologna: Il Mulino.
7.
CostaPSilvaFF (2015) The impact of voter evaluations of leaders’ traits on voting behaviour: evidence from seven European countries. West European Politics38(6): 1226–1250.
8.
CuddyAJCGlickPBeningerA (2011) The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior31: 73–98.
9.
DaltonRJ (2007) Partisan mobilization, cognitive mobilization and the changing American electorate. Electoral Studies26(2): 274–286.
10.
De LangeSLArtD (2011) Fortuyn versus Wilders: an agency-based approach to radical right party building. West European Politics34(6): 1229–1249.
11.
De SioLLachatR (2019) Making sense of party strategy innovation: challenge to ideology and conflict-mobilisation as dimensions of party competition. West European Politics43(3): 688–719.
12.
De VriesCHoboltS (2020) The rise of challenger parties. Political Insight11(3): 16–19.
13.
DonovanT (2021) Right populist parties and support for strong leaders. Party Politics27(5): 858–869.
14.
EatwellR (2018) Charisma and the radical right. In: RydgrenJ (ed) The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 251–268.
15.
Ferreira Da SilvaFCostaP (2019) Do we need warm leaders? Exploratory study of the role of voter evaluations of leaders’ traits on turnout in seven European countries. European Journal of Political Research58(1): 117–140.
16.
FiskeSCuddyAGlickP, et al. (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology82(6): 878–902.
17.
GarziaDFerreira da SilvaFDe AngelisA (2022) Partisan dealignment and the personalisation of politics in West European parliamentary democracies, 1961–2018. West European Politics45(2): 311–334.
18.
GolderM (2016) Far right parties in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science19: 477–497.
19.
GyárfášováOHlatkyR (2023) Personalized politics: evidence from the Czech and Slovak republics. Electoral Studies81: 102567.
20.
HaslamSAReicherSDPlatowMJ (2020) The New Psychology of Leadership: Identity, Influence and Power. London: Routledge.
21.
HayesD (2009) Has television personalized voting behavior?Political Behavior31: 231–260.
22.
HolianDPrysbyC (2014) Candidate Character Traits in Presidential Elections. London: Routledge.
23.
JohnstonR (2002) Prime ministerial contenders in Canada. In: KingA (ed) Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
KarvonenL (2010) The Personalisation of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: Ecpr Press.
25.
KeffordGMcDonnellD (2018) Inside the personal party: leader-owners, light organizations and limited lifespans. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations20(2): 379–394.
26.
Kestilä-KekkonenESöderlundP (2014) Party, leader or candidate? Dissecting the right-wing populist vote in Finland. European Political Science Review6(4): 641–662.
27.
KinderD (1983) Presidential traits. In: Pilot Study Report to the 1984 NES Planning Committee and NES Board. Washington, DC.
28.
KinderDRPetersMDAbelsonRP, et al. (1980) Presidential prototypes. Political Behavior2(4): 315–337.
29.
KingA (ed) (2002) Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
LauRR (1985) Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior. American Journal of Political Science29(1): 119–138.
31.
LaustsenLBorA (2017) The relative weight of character traits in political candidate evaluations: warmth is more important than competence, leadership and integrity. Electoral Studies49: 96–107.
32.
LoboMC (2008) Parties and leader effects: impact of leaders in the vote for different types of parties. Party Politics14(3): 281–298.
33.
LoboMCCurticeJ (2014) Personality Politics?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
LodgeMMcGrawKMStrohP (1989) An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review83(2): 399–419.
35.
LubbersMGijsbertsMScheepersP (2002) Extreme right-wing voting in western Europe. European Journal of Political Research41(3): 345–378.
36.
McGrawKM (2011) Candidate impression and evaluations. In: DruckmanJNGreenDPKuklinskiJH, et al. (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 187–200.
37.
MényYSurelY (2002) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
MichelEGarziaDFerreira da SilvaF, et al. (2020) Leader effects and voting for the populist radical right in Western Europe. Swiss Political Science Review26: 273–295.
39.
MolsFJettenJ (2020) Understanding support for populist radical right parties: toward a model that captures both demand-and supply-side factors. Frontiers in Communication5.
40.
MolsFHaslamSAPlatowMJ, et al. (2023) The social identity approach to political leadership. In: HuddyLSearsDOLevyJS, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
MuddeC (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
MuddeCRovira KaltwasserC (2013) Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary populism: comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition48(2): 147–174.
43.
QuinlanSMcAllisterI (2022) Leader or party? Quantifying and exploring behavioral personalization 1996–2019. Party Politics28(1): 24–37.
44.
RahatG (2024) Party types in the Age of personalized politics. Perspective on politics22(1): 213–228.
45.
RooduijnM (2015) The rise of the populist radical right in Western Europe. European view14(1): 3–11.
46.
SartoriG (1966) Opposition and control: problems and prospects. Government and Opposition1(2): 149–154.
47.
SteffensNKMolsFHaslamSA, et al. (2016) True to what we stand for: championing collective interests as a path to authentic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly27(5): 726–744.
48.
Van der BrugWMughanA (2007) Charisma, leader effects and support for right-wing populist parties. Party Politics13(1): 29–51.
49.
Van der EijkCFranklinMF (2009) Elections and voters. In: Hampshire. Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
Van der EijkCVan der BrugWKrohH, et al. (2006) Rethinking the dependent variable in voting behavior: on the measurement and analysis of electoral utilities. Electoral Studies25(3): 424–447.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
