Explaining ideological conflict has always been a classic theme of studies of party organizations. The aim of this paper is to re-examine May's law, based on rational choice theory, which suggests that due to differential incentives sub-leaders are likely to prove the most extreme stratum in party organizations, while non-leaders are the most moderate, and top leaders are located equidistant between these groups. The study, based on large-scale surveys of politicians, local constituency officers, party members and voters in the 1992 British general election, throws considerable doubt on this proposition.
Bennie, Lynn, G. , Curtice, John and Rudig, Wolfgang (1993) `Liberal, Social Democrat or Liberal Democrat? Political Identity and the British Center Party Politics', paper presented at EPOP Conference, Lancaster, September.
2.
Butler, David (1960) `The Paradox of Party Difference', American Behavioral Scientist4(3).
3.
Constantini, E. (1963) `Intraparty Attitude Conflict: Democratic Party Leadership in California', Western Political Quarterly16: 956-972.
4.
Dalton, Russell (1985) `Political Parties and Political Representation: Party Supporters and Party Elites in Nine Nations', Comparative Political Studies18: 267-299.
5.
Drucker, Henry (1979) Doctrine and Ethos in the Labour Party. London: Allen and Unwin.
6.
Duverger, Maurice (1964) Political Parties. London: Methuen.
7.
Eldersveld, S. J. (1964) Political Parties: A Behavioral Analysis. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
8.
Epstein, Leon (1967) Political Parties in Western Democracies. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
9.
Finer, S. E. (1980) The Changing British Party System 1945-1979. Washington, DC: AEI.
10.
Hall, Stuart (1988) The Hard Road to Renewal. London: Verso.
11.
Harrison, Martin (1982) Trade Unions and the Labour Parties since 1945. London: Allen and Unwin.
12.
Hauss, C. and Maisel, L.S. (1986) `Extremist Delegates: Myth and Reality', in R. B. Rapoport, A. I. Abramowitz and J. McGlennon (eds) The Life of Parties. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
13.
Heath, Anthony and McMahon, Dorren (1991) `Consensus and Dissensus', in Roger Jowell, Lindsay Brook and Bridget Taylor, with Gillian Prior (eds) British Social Attitudes: The 8th Report, pp. 1-21. Aldershot, Hants: Dartmouth for SCPR.
14.
Herrera, Richard and Taylor, Melanie (1994) `The Structure of Opinion in American Political Parties', unpublished paper, Arizona State University.
15.
Iversen, Torben (1994) `The Logics of Electoral Politics: Spatial, Directional, and Mobilization Effects'. Comparative Political Studies27(July): 155-189.
16.
Jackson, J. S. , Brown, B. L. and Bositis, D. (1982) `Herbert McClosky and Friends Revisited: 1980 Democratic and Republican Party Elites Compared with the Mass Public', American Politics Quarterly10: 158-180.
17.
Janosik, Eric (1968) Constituency Labour Parties in Britain. London: Pall Mall.
18.
Jessop, Bob , Bonnett, Kevin, Bromley, Simon and Ling, Tom (1988) Thatcherism. Oxford: Polity Press.
19.
Kirkpatrick, Jean (1976) The New Presidential Elite: Men and Women in National Politics. New York: Russell Sage.
20.
Kitschelt, H. (1989) `The Internal Politics of Parties: The Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited', Political Studies37: 400-421.
21.
Kogan, David and Kogan, Maurice (1982) The Battle for the Labour Party. London: Kogan Page.
22.
Lowell, A. L. (1908) The Government of England, Vol. 1. New York.
23.
May, John D. (1973) `Opinion Structure of Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity', Political Studies21(2): 135-151.
24.
McAllister, Ian (1991a) `Party Elites, Voters and Political Attitudes: Testing Three Explanations for Mass-Elite Differences', Canadian Journal of Political ScienceXXIV(2).
25.
McAllister, Ian (1991b) `The Political Attitudes of Australian Voters and Candidates', Australian Journal of Social Issues26(3): 163-190.
26.
McCloskey, Herbert , Hoffman, Paul and O'Hara, Rosemary (1960) `Issue Conflict and Consensus Among Party Leaders and Followers', American Political Science Review54: 406-427.
27.
McKenzie, R. T. (1964) British Political Parties. London: Mercury Books.
28.
Merkl, Peter (1980) `Attitudes, Ideology and Politics of Party Members', in Peter H. Merkl (ed.) Western European Party Systems. New York: Free Press.
29.
Michels, Robert (1949) Political Parties. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
30.
Miller, Warren E. , Jennings, M. Kent with Farah, Barbara G. (1986) Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
31.
Miller, Warren (1988) Without Consent: Mass-Elite Linkages in Presidential Politics. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
32.
Minkin, L. (1978) The Labour Party Conference: A Study in the Politics of Intra-Party Democracy. London: Allen Lane.
33.
New York Times/CBS (1992) `Delegate Survey', The New York Times, 13 July.
34.
Norris, Pippa (1994) `Labour party factionalism and extremism', in Anthony Heathet al. (eds) Labour's Last Chance? The 1992 Election and Beyond. Aldershot, Hants: Dartmouth.
35.
Norris, Pippa and Crewe, Ivor (1994) `Did the British Marginals Vanish? Proportionality and Exaggeration in the British Electoral System Revisited', Electoral Studies13(3): 201-221.
36.
Norris, Pippa and Lovenduski, Joni (1994) Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Norris, Pippa , Vallance, Elisabeth and Lovenduski, Joni (1992) `Do Candidates Make a Difference? Gender, Race, Ideology and Incumbency', Parliamentary Affairs45(4): 496-517.
38.
Ostrogorski, Mosei (1964) Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. New York: Anchor Books.
39.
Polsby, Nelson (1983) Consequences of Electoral Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
Polsby, Nelson W. and Wildavsky, Aaron (1991) Presidential Elections: Contemporary Strategies of American Electoral Politics, 8th edn, pp. 144-158. New York: Free Press.
41.
Rapoport, R. B. , Abramowitz, A. I. and McGlennon, J., eds (1986) The Life of the Parties: Activists in Presidential Politics. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
42.
Robertson, David (1976) A Theory of Party Competition. Chichester: Wiley.
43.
Rose, Richard (1962) `The Political Ideas of British Party Activists', American Political Science Review56(June): 360-371.
44.
Rose, Richard (1974) `The Ideas of Activists', in R. Rose (ed.) The Problem of Party Government, pp. 205-209. New York: Free Press.
45.
Rudig, Wolfgang , Bennie, Lynn G. and Franklin, Mark N. (1991) Green Party Members: A Profile. Glasgow: Delta Publications.
46.
Seyd, Patrick (1987) The Rise and Fall of the Labour Left. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
47.
Seyd, Patrick and Whiteley, Paul (1991) `Political Ideology and Party Activism in the Labour Party', paper presented at the Political Studies Association Annual Conference, Lancaster University.
48.
Seyd, Patrick and Whiteley, Paul F. (1992) Labour's Grass Roots: The Politics of Labour Party Membership. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
49.
Shaw, Eric (1988) Discipline and Discord in the Labour Party. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
50.
Turner, John (1978) Labour's Doorstep Politics in London. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
51.
Whiteley, Paul , Seyd, Patrick and Richardson, Jeremy (1993) `Thatcherism and the Conservative Party', paper presented at the EPOP Conference, Lancaster, September.
52.
Yates, I. (1960) `Power in the Labour Party', Political Quarterly31(3).
