What explains women’s underrepresentation in first-past-the-post compared to at-large elections? While existing studies emphasize candidate experience or party nomination to competitive districts, we argue that local party selectors are more likely to desire women to have a type of political experience that signals their connection to the national party. To test our argument, we use a novel dataset of over 10,000 local candidates nominated by South Africa’s African National Congress party. In South Africa’s Mixed Member Proportional system, we find that compared to men, women are more likely to be nominated in FPTP elections after having previous experience as PR councillors. Previous PR experience is distinct from other forms of experience such as incumbency, and contextual factors such as pre-electoral intra-party violence do not explain women’s nomination to FPTP seats. These findings contribute to our understanding of how electoral systems impact parties’ nomination of female candidates at the local level.
AnziaSFBernhardR (2022) Gender stereotyping and the electoral success of women candidates: new evidence from local elections in the United States. British Journal of Political Science52(1): 1544–1563.
2.
BauerNM (2020) Running local: gender stereotyping and female candidates in local elections. Urban Affairs Review56(1): 96–123.
3.
BauerGDarkwahAK (2020) We would rather be leaders than parliamentarians: women and political office in Ghana. European Journal of Politics and Gender3(1): 101–119.
4.
BernickEMHeidbrederB (2018) Disproportionately overrepresented: women in local elected offices. State and Local Government Review50(3): 165–176.
BjarnegardE (2023) The continuum of election violence: gendered candidate experiences in the Maldives. International Political Science Review44(1): 107–121.
7.
BjarnegardEZetterbergP (2011) Removing quotas, maintaining representation: overcoming gender inequalities in political party recruitment. Representation47(2): 187–199.
8.
BjarnegrdEHåkanssonSZetterbergP (2022) Gender and violence against political candidates: lessons from Sri Lanka. Politics and Gender18(1): 33–61.
9.
BooysenS (2012) Local Elections in South Africa: Parties, People, Politics. Bloemfontein: African Sun Media.
10.
BrittonHE (2008) Challenging traditional thinking on electoral systems. Women and legislative representation: Electoral systems, political parties, and sex quotas111–122.
11.
BrittonHE (2020) Ending Gender-Based Violence: Justice and Community in South Africa. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
12.
BruceD (2016) A provincial concern? Political killings in South Africa. South African Crime Quarterly45: 13–24.
13.
CareyJMShugartMS (1995) Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: a rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies14(4): 417–439.
14.
ClaytonAZetterbergP (2021) Gender and party discipline: evidence from Africa’s emerging party systems. American Political Science Review115(3): 869–884.
15.
ClaytonARobinsonALJohnsonMC, et al. (2020) How) do voters discriminate against women candidates? Experimental and qualitative evidence from Malawi. Comparative Political Studies53(3–4): 601–630.
16.
DarracqV (2008) The African national congress (ANC) organization at the grassroots. African Affairs107(429): 589–609.
17.
Davidson-SchmichLK (2010) Gender quota compliance and contagion in the 2009 Bundestag election. German Politics and Society28(3): 132–155.
18.
DawsonSCharronNJustesenMK (2023) Electoral competition, political parties and clientelism: evidence from local elections in South Africa. Democratization30(3): 479–500.
19.
DeenRELittleTH (1999) Getting to the top: factors influencing the selection of women to positions of leadership in state legislatures. State and Local Government Review31(2): 123–134.
20.
Du ToitPde JagerN (2014) South Africa’s dominant-party system in comparative perspective. Taiwan Journal of Democracy10(2): 149–170.
21.
EaglyAHKarauSJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review109(3): 573–598.
22.
EdgellAB (2018) Vying for a man seat: gender quotas and sustainable representation in Africa. African Studies Review61(1): 185–214.
23.
FaroleSA (2023) Local electoral institutions and the dynamic motivations of ethnic party candidate nominations in South Africa. Comparative Politics55(3): 497–519.
24.
FoxRLLawlessJL (2010) If only they’d ask: gender, recruitment, and political ambition. The Journal of Politics72(2): 310–326.
25.
FranceschetSPiscopoJM (2012) Gender and political backgrounds in Argentina. In: The Impact of Gender Quotas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 43–56.
26.
GiollabhuíSM (2013) How things fall apart: candidate selection and the cohesion of dominant parties in South Africa and Namibia. Party Politics19(4): 577–600.
HardingR (2012) Democracy, Urbanization, and Rural Bias: Explaining Urban/rural Differences in Incumbent Support across Africa. Accra: Afrobarometer Working Paper.
29.
HinojosaM (2012) Selecting Women, Electing Women: Political Representation and Candidate Selection in Latin America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
30.
HinojosaMFranceschetS (2012) Separate but not equal: the effects of municipal electoral reform on female representation in Chile. Political Research Quarterly65(4): 758–770.
31.
HuangC-L (2016) Reserved for whom? The electoral impact of gender quotas in Taiwan. Pacific Affairs89: pp. 325–343.
32.
HuddyLTerkildsenN (1993) Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates. American Journal of Political Science37(1): 119–147.
JonesMP (1998) Gender quotas, electoral laws, and the election of women: lessons from the Argentine provinces. Comparative Political Studies31(1): 3–21.
KrookMLSaninJR (2020) The cost of doing politics? Analyzing violence and harassment against female politicians. Perspectives on Politics18(3): 740–755. Cambridge University Press.
38.
KunovichSPaxtonP (2005) Pathways to power: the role of political parties in women’s national political representation. American Journal of Sociology111(2): 505–552.
39.
LawlessJL (2004) Women, war, and winning elections: gender stereotyping in the post-September 11th era. Political Research Quarterly57(3): 479–490.
40.
LeeY-I (2019) The leaky pipeline and sacrificial lambs: gender, candidate nomination, and district assignment in South Korea’s national legislative elections. Electoral Studies59(1): 27–38.
41.
LiebermanEMartinPMcMurryN (2021) When do strong parties “throw the bums out”? competition and accountability in South African candidate nominations. Studies in Comparative International Development56(3): 316–342.
42.
LodgeT (2003) Politics in South Africa: From Mandela to Mbeki. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
MatlandRE (1998) Women’s representation in national legislatures: Developed and developing countries. Legislative Studies Quarterly23(1): 109–125.
46.
MatlandREStudlarDT (1996) The contagion of women candidates in single-member district and proportional representation electoral systems: Canada and Norway. The Journal of Politics58(3): 707–733.
MitchellNKMonroeB (2014) Where do women run? A case for the study of “women friendly districts” in state legislative primaries. Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications2(4): 37–57.
MurrayRKrookMLOpelloKA (2012) Why are gender quotas adopted? Party pragmatism and parity in France. Political Research Quarterly65(3): 529–543.
52.
MurrayRMuriaasRWangV (2023) Editorial introduction: gender and political financing. International Political Science Review44(1): 3–12.
53.
NdenzeB (2011) ANC, DA get into gear for local polls. Cape Times January27.
54.
NivenD (1998) Party elites and women candidates: the shape of bias. Women and Politics19(2): 57–80.
55.
NivenD (2006) Throwing your hat out of the ring: negative recruitment and the gender imbalance in state legislative candidacy. Politics and Gender2(4): 473–489.
56.
NorrisP (1996) Mobilising the ‘women’s vote’: The gender-generation gap in voting behaviour. Parliamentary Affairs49(2): 333–342.
57.
NorrisP (2004) Electoral engineering: Voting rules and political behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
ParadzaGMokwenaLRichardsR (2010) Assessing the Role of Councillors in Service Delivery at Local Government Level in South Africa: Research Report No 125. Johannesburg: Centre for Policy Studies (CPS).
59.
PiperL (2012) Further from the people–bipartisan “nationalisation” thwarting the electoral system. Local Elections in South Africa: Parties, People, Politics. Bloemfontein: African Sun Media, 31–44.
60.
PiscopoJM (2016) State capacity, criminal justice, and political rights. Rethinking violence against women in politics. Politica y Gobierno23(2): 437–458.
61.
ReederBWSeebergMB (2018) Fighting your friends? A study of intra-party violence in sub-Saharan Africa. Democratization25(6): 1033–1051.
62.
RuleW (1994) Women’s underrepresentation and electoral systems. PS: Political Science & Politics27(4): 689–692.
63.
SeebergMBWahmanMSkaaningS (2018) Candidate nomination, intra-party democracy, and election violence in Africa. Democratization25(6): 959–977.
64.
ShinK (2014) Women’s sustainable representation and the spillover effect of electoral gender quotas in South Korea. International Political Science Review35(1): 80–92.
ThomasMBodetMA (2013) Sacrificial lambs, women candidates, and district competitiveness in Canada. Electoral Studies32(1): 153–166.
68.
ValdiniME (2013) Electoral institutions and the manifestation of bias: the effect of the personal vote on the representation of women. Politics and Gender9(1): 76–92.
69.
Von BorzyskowskiIWahmanM (2021) Systematic measurement error in election violence data: Causes and consequences. British Journal of Political Science51(1): 230–252.
70.
WangVMuriaasRLBauerG (2021) Funding demands and gender in political recruitment: what parties do in Cabo Verde and Ghana. International Political Science Review44(1): 77–90.
71.
WarrenS (2019) Sacrificial Lambs: Female Candidates in New Democracies. Washington, D.C.: AmericanPolitical Science Association Annual Meeting. Working Paper presented at the 2019 meeting.
72.
WegnerE (2016) Local-level accountability in a dominant party system. Government and Opposition53(1): 51–75.
73.
YoonMY (2013) Special seats for women in parliament and democratization: The case of Tanzania. Women’s Studies International Forum41(2): 143–149.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
