How does democratic transition affect party polarization? While previous literature on party politics in post-transition environments describes a fragmented political system marked by multi-partism and the rise of weakly institutionalized parties, party polarization in young democracies is underexplored. We argue that democratic transition reduces party polarization by introducing a new set of parties which have not consolidated their issue positions yet. The ambiguity of party positions makes ideological attributes less salient and renders a less polarized party politics. To assess the impact of the party polarization in young democracies, we employ a fuzzy regression discontinuity design (RDD). We use the Manifesto Project data on right-left positions of parties from 58 countries to measure party polarization and the Varieties of Democracy (V-DEM) data on regime transition to identify democratic transitions. Our findings suggest that party polarization on right-left issue position decreases on average, following the democratic transition.
Abou-ChadiTKrauseW (2018) The causal effect of radical right success on mainstream parties’ policy positions: a regression discontinuity approach. British Journal of Political Science50(3): 1–19.
2.
AbramowitzAISaundersKL (2008) Is polarization a myth?Journal of Politics70(2): 542–555.
3.
ArbatliERosenbergD (2021) United we stand, divided we rule: how political polarization erodes democracy. Democratization28(2): 285–307.
4.
BaderM (2008) Fluid party politics and the challenge for democracy assistance in Georgia. Caucasian Review of International Affairs2(2): 1–10.
5.
BaleT (2007) Are bans on political parties bound to turn out badly? A comparative investigation of three ‘intolerant’ democracies: Turkey, Spain, and Belgium. Comparative European Politics5: 141–157.
6.
BandaKKCluveriusJ (2018) Elite polarization, party extremity, and affective polarization. Electoral Studies56: 90–101.
7.
BernhardM (2001) Democratization in Germany: a reappraisal. Comparative Politics33(4): 379–400.
8.
BetzHG (1999) Contemporary right-wing radicalism in Europe. Contemporary European History8(2): 299–316.
9.
BielasiakJ (2005) Party competition in emerging democracies: representation and effectiveness in post-communism and beyond. Democratization12(3): 331–356.
10.
BoixCStokesS (2003) Endogenous democratization. World Politics55: 517–549.
11.
BoltJVan ZandenJL (2020) Maddison Style Estimates of the Evolution of the World Economy. A New 2020 Update. Maddison Project Database. Version 2020. Groningen: Groningen Growth and Development Centre at the University of Groningen.
12.
BornschierS (2016) Historical polarization and representation in South American party systems, 1900-1990. British Journal of Political Science49(1): 153–179.
13.
BrumbergD (2002) Democratization in the Arab world? The trap of liberalized autocracy. Journal of Democracy13: 56–68.
14.
CalvoEHellwigT (2011) Centripetal and centrifugal incentives under different electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science55(1): 27–41.
15.
CapocciaG (2005) Defending Democracy: Reactions to Extremism in Interwar Europe. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
16.
CapocciaGZiblattD (2010) The historical turn in democratization studies: a new research agenda for Europe and beyond. Comparative Political Studies43: 931–968.
17.
CarothersT (2002) The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy13(1): 5–21.
18.
Casal BértoaFBourneA (2017) Prescribing democracy? Party proscription and party system stability in Germany, Spain, and Turkey. European Journal of Political Research56(2): 440–465.
19.
CattaneoMDTitiunikRVazquez-BareG (2020) Analysis of regression-discontinuity designs with multiple cutoffs or multiple scores. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata20(4): 866–891.
20.
CoxGW (1990) Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science34(4): 903–935.
21.
CuriniLHinoA (2012) Missing links in party-system polarization: how institutions and voters matter. The Journal of Politics74(2): 460–473.
22.
DaltonRJ (2008) The quantity and the quality of party systems: party system polarization, its measurement, and its consequences. Comparative Political Studies41(7): 899–920.
23.
DiamondL (2002) Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy13(2): 21–35.
24.
DiamondL (2010) Democracy’s past and future: why are there no Arab democracies?Journal of Democracy21(1): 93–112.
25.
DiMaggioPEvansJBrysonB (1996) Have Americans’ social attitudes become more polarized?American Journal of Sociology102(3): 690–755.
26.
DjuveVLKnutsenCHWigT (2022) V-Dem Codebook v12. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
27.
DunningT (2012) Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
EndersAM (2021) Issues versus affect: how do elite and mass polarization compare?The Journal of Politics83(4): 1872–1877.
29.
EpsteinDLBatesRGoldstoneJ, et al. (2006) Democratic transitions. American Journal of Political Science50: 551–569.
30.
EzrowL (2007) The variance matters: how party systems represent the preferences of voters. The Journal of Politics69(1): 182–192.
31.
EzrowLTavitsMHomolaJ (2014) Voter polarization, strength of partisanship, and support for extremist parties. Comparative Political Studies47(11): 1558–1583.
32.
FiorinaMPAbramsSJPopeJC (2005) Culture War? the Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.
33.
FishMSAbramsNA (2020) The polarization paradox. Journal of Democracy31(2): 182–185.
34.
GarandJC (2010) Income inequality, party polarization, and roll-call voting in the U.S. senate. The Journal of Politics72(No.4): 1109–1128.
35.
GelmanAImbensG (2019) Why high-order polynomials should not be used in regression discontinuity designs. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics37(3): 447–456.
36.
GemenisK (2013) What to do (and not to do) with the comparative manifestos project data. Political Studies61(1_suppl): 3–23.
37.
GlennJK (2003) Parties out of movements: party emergence in post-communist Eastern Europe. In: GoldstoneJA (ed), States, Parties, and Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
HagopianF (2007) Parties and voters in emerging democracies. In: BoixCStokesSC (eds), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 582–603.
39.
HaleHE (2013) Regime change cascades: what we have learned from the 1848 revolutions to the 2011 Arab uprisings. Annual Review of Political Science16: 331–353.
40.
HeX (2019) China's electrification and rural labor: analysis with fuzzy regression discontinuity. Energy Economics81: 650–660.
41.
HeoUStocktonH (2005) The impact of democratic transition on elections and parties in South Korea. Party Politics11(6): 674–688.
42.
HigleyJBurtonMG (1989) The elite variable in democratic transitions and breakdowns. American Sociological Review54: 17–32.
43.
HigleyJBurtonMG (2006) Elite Foundations of Liberal Democracy. Washington: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
44.
HopkinJ (2009) Party matters: devolution and party politics in Britain and Spain. Party Politics15(2): 179–198.
45.
HuntingtonSP (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
46.
ImbensGWLemieuxT (2008) Regression discontinuity designs: a guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics142(2): 615–635.
47.
ImbensGKalyanaramanK (2012) Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. The Review of Economic Studies79(3): 933–959.
48.
IyengarSWestwoodSJ (2015) Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science59(3): 690–707.
49.
JacobRZhuPSomersMA, et al. (2012) A Practical Guide to Regression Discontinuity. New York: MDRC.
50.
KarpatK (2010) Türk Demokrasi Tarihi: Sosyal, Kültürel, Ekonomik Temeller. İstanbul: Timaş Yayınları.
51.
KatzRSMairP (1996) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics1(1): 5–28.
52.
KimyaF (2021) Authoritarian Legacies, Weakness of Political Parties, and Prospects for Tunisian Democracy. Al Sharq Strategic Research.
53.
KuenziMLambrightG (2001) Party system institutionalization in 30 African Countries. Party Politics7(4): 437–468.
54.
KuranT (1991) Now out of never: the element of surprise in the East European revolution of 1989. World Politics44(1): 7–48.
55.
LaymanGCCarseyTMHorowitzJM (2006) Party polarization in American politics: characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science9: 83–110.
56.
Le BasA (2006) Polarization as craft: party formation and state violence in Zimbabwe. Comparative Politics38(4): 419–438.
57.
Le BasA (2018) Can polarization be positive? Conflict and institutional development in Africa. American Behavioral Scientist62(1): 59–74.
58.
LeeD S (2008) Randomized experiments from non-random selection in US House elections. Journal of Econometrics142(2): 675–697.
59.
LelkesY (2016) Mass polarization: manifestations and measurements. Public Opinion Quarterly80: 392–410.
60.
LevitskySMurilloMV (2009) Variation in institutional strength. Annual Review of Political Science12: 115–133.
61.
LevitskySWayL (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
LinzJJ (1990) The transition to democracy. The Washington Quarterly13(3): 143–164.
63.
LinzJJStepanA C (1996) Toward consolidated democracies. Journal of Democracy7(2): 14–33.
64.
LuebbertG (1991) Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
LupuNRiedlRB (2012) Political parties and uncertainty in developing democracies. Comparative Political Studies46(11): 1339–1365.
66.
LupuN (2015) Party polarization and mass partisanship: a comparative perspective. Political Behavior37: 331–356.
67.
LupuN (2016) Building party brands in Argentina and Brazil. In: LevitskySLoxtonJVan DyckB, et.al. (eds), Challenges of Party-Building Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
MainwaringSScullyTR (1995) Introduction: party systems in Latin America. In: MainwaringSScullyT (eds), Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 1–36.
69.
McCoyJRahmanTSomerM (2018) Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. American Behavioral Scientist62(1): 16–42.
70.
MeguidB (2005) Competition between unequals: the role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review99(3): 347–359.
71.
MerrittRL (1995) Democracy Imposed: U.S. Occupation Policy and the German Public, 1945-1949. New Haven: Yale University Press.
72.
MerklP (1968) Allied strategies of effecting political change and their reception in occupied Germany. Public Policy17: 102–103.
73.
MerkelW (1998) The consolidation of post-autocratic democracies: a multi-level model. Democratization5(3): 33–67.
74.
Mete-DokucuHJustA (2021) Party system polarization in developing democracies: the case of Turkey, 1950–2018. Turkish Studies23(3): 331–353.
75.
MeyerTMMillerB (2015) The niche party concept and its measurement. Party Politics21(2): 259–271.
76.
Mierzejewski-VoznyakMG (2014) Party politics after the colour revolutions: party institutionalisation and democratisation in Ukraine and Georgia. East European Politics30(1): 86–104.
77.
MillerM (2012) Economic development, violent leader removal, and democratization. American Journal of Political Science56: 1002–1020.
78.
MooreB (1966) Social Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
79.
MoraesJA (2015) The Electoral Basis of Ideological Polarization in Latin America. The Kellogg Institute for International Studies. Working Paper 403.
80.
MoralMBestR (2022) On the relationship between party polarization and citizen polarization. Party Politics29: 229–247.
81.
MøllerJSkaaningSE (2013) Democracy and Democratization in Comparative Perspective: Conceptions, Conjunctures, Causes, and Consequences. New York: Routledge.
82.
MuddeC (2000) Extreme-right parties in Eastern Europe. Patterns of Prejudice34(1): 5–27.
83.
MuisJImmerzeelT (2017) Causes and consequences of the rise of populist radical right parties and movements in Europe. Current Sociology. La Sociologie Contemporaine65(6): 909–930.
84.
NiclaussK (1982) Political reconstruction at bonn. In: HerzJH (ed), From Dictatorship to Democracy: Coping with the Legacies of Authoritarianism and Totalitarianism. Westport: Greenwood Press.
85.
NugentER (2020) After Repression: How Polarization Derails Democratic Transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
86.
O’DonellGA (1994) Delegative democracy. Journal of Democracy5(1): 55–69.
87.
ÖzbudunE (2013) Party Politics & Social Cleavages in Turkey. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
88.
PelizzoRBabonesS (2007) The political economy of polarized pluralism. Party Politics13(1): 53–67.
89.
PrzeworskiA (1991) Some problems in the study of the transition to democracy. In: O’DonnellGSchmitterP (eds), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
90.
SamkharadzeN (2022) What does the polarization in Georgia look like and how to measure it?Policy Memo No. 60Georgian Institute of Politics, pp. 1–13.
91.
SartoriG (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Volume I.
92.
SchedlerA (1995) Under and Overinstitutionalization. The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies.
93.
SchedlerA (2013) The politics of uncertainty: sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism. In: Oxford studies in democratization. First Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
94.
SeawrightJ (2012) Party-System Collapse: The Roots of Crisis in Peru and Venezuela. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
95.
ShangHFanJFanB, et al. (2022) Economic effects of ecological compensation policy in Shiyang River Basin: empirical research based on DID and RDD models. Sustainability14(5): 2999.
96.
StepanA (1997) Democratic opposition and democratization theory. Government and Opposition32(4): 657–678.
97.
StiglerMQuastB (2022) Package ‘rddtools’.
98.
SvolikM (2019) Polarization versus democracy. Journal of Democracy30(3): 20–32.
99.
SzczerbiakA (2006) Power without love? Patterns of party politics in Post-1989 Poland. In: Jungerstam-MuldersS (ed), Post-Communist EU Member States. New York: Routledge.
100.
TaylorMHermanVM (1971) Party systems and government stability. American Political Science Review65(1): 28–37.
101.
ThoemmesFLiaoWJinZ (2017) The analysis of the regression-discontinuity design in R. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics42(3): 341–360.
102.
TworzeckiH (2019) Poland: a case of top-down polarization. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science681: 97–119.
103.
ValentimVRuipérez NúñezADinasE (2021) Regression discontinuity designs: a hands-on guide for practice. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica51(2): 250–268.
104.
VolkensABurstTKrauseW, et.al. (2021) The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2021a.” Berlin: Wissenschaftszen-trum Berlin fur Sozialforschung(WZB). DOI: 10.25522/manifesto.mpds.2021a.
105.
Von BeymeK (1988) Right-wing extremism in post-war Europe. West European Politics11(2): 1–18.
106.
WaldnerDLustE (2016) Parties in transitional democracies: authoritarian legacies and post-authoritarian challenges in the Middle East and North Africa. In: YasharDBermeoN (eds), Parties, Movements, and Democracy in the Developing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
107.
WilfordAM (2017) Polarization, number of parties, and voter turnout: explaining turnout in 26 OECD countries. Social Science Quarterly98(5): 1391–1405.
108.
Yardımcı-GeyikçiŞTürÖ (2018) Rethinking the Tunisian miracle: a party politics view. Democratization25(5): 787–803.
109.
ZhangZCaiWFengX (2017) How do urban households in China respond to increasing block pricing in electricity? Evidence from a fuzzy regression discontinuity approach. Energy Policy105: 161–172.
110.
ZiblattD (2017) Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
111.
ZingalesL (2003) For Iraq, A Plan Worthy of Zambia. The Washington Post.
112.
ZürcherEJ (2004) Turkey: A Modern History. London: I.B. Tauris.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
