In several world regions, democracy is in retreat. This retreat is taking place amid growing polarization in many countries, and analysts are increasingly concerned with the role that deepening political divisions play in processes of democratic decline. This article investigates the relationship between partisan polarization and deteriorating public support for democratic institutions. It leverages the case of Indonesia, a major third-wave democracy now in the midst of a democratic regression. Indonesia’s political landscape has become more ideologically polarized in recent years, despite the strength of clientelist networks and low levels of party identification. Using four survey experiments, we find that Indonesians embrace illiberal interventions and abandon democratic institutions when exposed to party and leadership cues. These results suggest that political polarization may prompt citizens to abandon democratic norms even in democracies without strong partisan identities.
AspinallE (2010) Indonesia: the irony of success. Journal of Democracy21(2): 20–34.
2.
AspinallEMietznerM (2019) Southeast Asia’s troubling elections: nondemocratic pluralism in Indonesia. Journal of Democracy30(4): 104–118.
3.
AspinallEMietznerMTomsaD (2015) The Yudhoyono Presidency: Indonesia’s Decade of Stability and Stagnation. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
4.
BermeoN (2003) Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
BermeoN (2016) On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy27(1): 5–19.
6.
CarothersTO’DonohueA (2019) Introduction. In: CarothersTO’DonohueA (eds) Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. pp. 1–16.
7.
FachrudinAA (2019) Jokowi and NU: the view from the Pesantren. New Mandala11.
8.
FossatiD (2019) The resurgence of ideology in Indonesia: political Islam, Aliran and political behavior. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs38(2): 119–148.
9.
FossatiDAspinallEMuhtadiB, et al. (2020) Ideological representation in clientelistic democracies: the Indonesian case. Electoral Studies63: 102111.
10.
FossatiDMartinez i ComaF (2020) Exploring citizen turnout and invalid voting in Indonesia: Two sides of the same coin?Contemporary Politics26(2): 125–146.
11.
GlasiusM (2018) What authoritarianism is…and is not: a practice perspective. International Affairs94(3): 515–533.
12.
GrahamMH (2020) Does partisan identity reduce support for electoral fairness? An experimental test. Prepared for the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association.
13.
GrahamMHSvolikMW (2020) Democracy in America? Partisanship, polarization, and the robustness of support for democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review114(2): 392–409.
14.
HadizVR (2017) Indonesia’s year of democratic setbacks: Towards a new phase of deepening illiberalism?Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies53(3): 261–278.
15.
HeBWagenaarH (2018) Authoritarian deliberation revisited. Japanese Journal of Political Science19(4): 622–629.
16.
HelmkeGLevitskyS (2006) Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17.
HickenA (2020) Indonesia’s democracy in comparative perspective. In: PowerTWarburtonE (eds) Democracy in Indonesia: From Stagnation to Regression?Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 23–44.
KitscheltHWilkinsonSI (2007) Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20.
LevitskySZiblattD (2018) How Democracies Die. New York, NY: Broadway Books.
21.
LührmannALindbergSI (2019) A third wave of autocratization is here: What is new about it?Democratization27(7): 1095–1113.
22.
LussierDNFishMS (2012) Indonesia: the benefits of civic engagement. Journal of Democracy23(1): 70–84.
23.
MainwaringSTorcalM (2006) Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization. Handbook of party politics11(6): 204–227.
24.
McCoyJRahmanTSomerM (2018) Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. American Behavioral Scientist62(1): 16–42.
25.
MechkovaVLührmannALindbergSI (2017) How much democratic backsliding?Journal of Democracy28(4): 162–169.
26.
MietznerM (2019) Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization27(6): 1021–1036.
27.
MuhtadiB (2019) Vote Buying in Indonesia: The Mechanics of Electoral Bribery. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
MujaniSLiddleRWAmbardiK (2018) Voting Behavior in Indonesia Since Democratization: Critical Democrats. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
NuraniyahN (2020) Divided Muslims: militant pluralism, polarisation and democratic backsliding. In: PowerTWarburtonE (eds) Democracy in Indonesia: From Stagnation to Regression?Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 23–44.
30.
NyhanBHelmkeGSandersM, et al. (2020) Who will defend democracy? Evaluating tradeoffs in candidate support among partisan donors and voters. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. Epub ahead of print 07 July 2020. DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2020.1790577
31.
PisaniEBuehlerM (2017) Why do Indonesian politicians promote shari’a laws? An analytic framework for Muslim-majority democracies. Third World Quarterly38(3): 734–752.
32.
PowerT (2018) Jokowi’s authoritarian turn and Indonesia’s democratic decline. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies54(3): 307–338.
33.
PowerTWarburtonE (eds) (2020) Democracy in Indonesia: From Stagnation to Regression?Singapore: ISEAS.
34.
SartoriG (1976) Parties and Party systems: A Framework for Analysis. Colchester: ECPR Press.
35.
SlaterDArugayAA (2018) Polarizing figures: executive power and institutional conflict in Asian democracies. American Behavioral Scientist62(1): 92–106.
36.
StepanALinzJ (1978) The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
37.
StolleDGidengilEBergeron-BoutinO (2019) Partisanship and support for democratic backsliding: observational and experimental evidence from the United States and Canada. Prepared for presentation at the Seventh Annual Toronto Political Behavior Workshop at the Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, University of Toronto.
38.
SvolikM (2018) When polarization trumps civic virtue: partisan conflict and the subversion of democracy by incumbents. Available at: SSRN 3243470 (accessed 27 January 2021).
39.
SvolikMW (2019) Polarization versus democracy. Journal of Democracy30(3): 20–32.
40.
WarburtonE (2019) Polarisation and democratic decline in Indonesia. In: CarothersTO’DonohueA (eds) Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization. Washington, DC: Brooking Institution Press.
41.
WarburtonEAspinallE (2019) Explaining Indonesia’s democratic regression: structure, agency and popular opinion. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs41(2): 255–285.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
