What explains party preference? Ideology and values do but these explanations are undertheorized. We offer grid-group cultural theory (CT) to provide a theory of ideology and values to explain party preference. We aim to demonstrate the value of an operationalization of CT that includes rejection of cultural bias (rejection of political values and beliefs) to explain party preference. Our study builds on research that recognizes the importance of negative partisanship and of rejecting cultural biases and other values in party choice. We analyze the influence of cultural biases on party preference in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. We find that respondents’ top two cultural biases explain up to a third of the variation in respondents’ party support in these Nordic multi-party systems and that rejection of cultural biases is an important determinant of party preference. We discuss how our analysis can be extended to other party systems including those with only two major parties.
6PSwedlowB (2016) Introduction to the symposium: in institutional theory of cultural biases, public administration and public policy. Public Administration94(4): 867–880.
2.
AardalBBerghJKarlsenR (2015) Hvorfor stemmer velgerne som de gjør? In: AardalBBerghJ (eds) Valg og Velgere: En Studie av Stortingsvalget 2013. Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
3.
AbramowitzAIWebsterSW (2016) The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies41: 12–22, DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.001.
4.
AbramowitzAIWebsterSW (2018) Negative partisanship: why Americans dislike parties but behave like rabid partisans. Advances in Political Psychology39(1): 119–135, DOI: 10.1111/pops.12479.
5.
BerglundSLindströmU (1978) The Scandinavian Party System(s). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
6.
BovensMTrappenburgM (2006) Segregation through anti-discrimination: how the Netherlands got divided again. In: MarcoVThompsonM (eds) Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World: Governance, Politics, and Plural Perceptions. London: Palgrave/ Macmillan, 86–104.
7.
BradyHSnidermanP (1985) Attitude attribution: a group basis for political reasoning. American Political Science Review79(4): 1061–1078.
8.
CarminesEGD’AmicoNJ (2015) The new look in political ideology research. Annual Review of Political Science18: 205–216.
9.
CaruanaNJMcGregorRMStephensonLB (2014) The power of the dark side: negative partisanship and political behaviour in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science48(4): 771–789, DOI: 10.1017/S0008423914000882.
10.
ChaiS-KWildavskyA (1998) Cultural change, party ideology, and electoral outcomes. In: ChaiSSwedlowB (eds). Culture and Social Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 299–316.
11.
CoughlinRMLockhartC (1998) Grid-group theory and political ideology: a consideration of their relative strengths and weaknesses for explaining the structure of mass belief systems. Journal of Theoretical Politics10(1):33–58, DOI: 10.1177/0951692898010001002.
12.
CoyleDJ (1994) “This land is my land, this land is your land”: cultural conflict in environmental and land use regulation. In: CoyleDJEllisR (eds) Politics, Policy, and Culture.Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 33–50.
13.
DouglasM (1999) Four cultures: the evolution of a parsimonious model. Geo Journal47(3): 411–415. doi:10.1023/A:1007008025151.
14.
EstradaLM (2005) Party Identification in Mexico. PhD Thesis. University of California, San Diego.
15.
FavreMSwedlowBVerweijM (2019) A cultural theory and model of power relations. Journal of Political Power. DOI: 10.1080/2158379X.2019.1624060
16.
FeldmanSHuddyL (2014) Not so simple: the multidimensional nature and diverse origins of political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences37(3): 312–313.
17.
FeldmanSZuckermanAS (1982) Partisan attitudes and the vote moving beyond party identification. Comparative Political Studies15(2): 197–222.
GastilJBramanDKahanD, et al. (2011) The cultural orientation of mass political opinion. PS: Political Science and Politics44(4): 711–714.
20.
GilljamMOscarssonH (1996) Mapping the Nordic party space. Scandinavian Political Studies19(1): 25–44, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.1996.tb00379.x.
21.
GorenP (2005) Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science49(4): 881–896.
22.
GorenPFedericoCMKittilsonMC (2009) Source cues, partisan identities, and political value expression. American Journal of Political Science53(4): 805–820.
23.
GrendstadG (1999) A political cultural map of Europe. A survey approach. GeoJournal47(3): 463–475.
24.
GrendstadG (2003a) Comparing political orientations: grid-group theory versus the left-right dimension in the five Nordic countries. European Journal of Political Research42(1): 1–21. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00072.
25.
GrendstadG (2003b) Reconsidering nordic party space. Scandinavian Political Studies26(3): 190–217.
26.
GrendstadGJensenLKristinssonG, et al. (1999) Nordic Cultures Measurement, Consequences and Comparisons: Study Description and Frequencies. Bergen: LOS-senteret.
27.
GrendstadGSelleP (1997) Cultural theory, postmaterialism, and environmental attitudes. In: EllisRJThompsonM (eds) Culture Matters: Essays in Honor of Aaron Wildavsky.Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 151–168.
28.
GrendstadGSelleP (1999) The formation and transformation of preferences: cultural theory and postmaterialism compared. In: GrendstadGSellePThompsonM (eds) Cultural Theory as Political Science.London, UK: Routledge, 43–58.
29.
HammerDC (1994) Cultural theory and historical change: the development of town and church in Puritan New England. In: CoyleDJEllisRJ (eds) Politics, Policy, and Culture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 137–156.
30.
HeathAMartinJ (1997) Why are there so few formal measuring instruments in social and political science research? In: LybergLBiemerPCollinsM, et al. (eds) Survey Measurement and Process Quality. New York: Wiley.
31.
HetheringtonMJWeilerJD (2009) Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
HornungJBandelowNC (2021) Party identification and cultural theory in Europe: methodologically advancing comparative studies of the advocacy coalition framework.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, Pdfahead of print 14 February 2021. DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2021.1891834.
33.
IntriligatorMDWedelJRLeeCH (2006) What Russia can learn from China in its transition to a market economy. In: VerweijMThompsonM (eds) Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World: Governance, Politics, and Plural Perceptions. London: Palgrave/ Macmillan, 105–131.
34.
IvarsflatenE (2008) What unites Right-Wing populists in Western Europe? re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies41 (1):3–23.
35.
JacksonNM (2014) A theory of preference formation among ideologues and nonideologues. Social Science Quarterly96(1): 1–18.
36.
JacobyWG (2006) Value choices and American public opinion. American Journal of Political Science50: 706–723.
37.
JacobyWG (2014) Is there a culture war? conflicting value structures in American public opinion. American Political Science Review108(4): 754–771.
38.
JohnsonBBSwedlowB (2019b) Comparing cultural theory and cultural cognition theory survey measures to each other and as explanations for judged risk. Journal of Risk Research. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2019.1646310.
39.
JohnsonBBSwedlowB (2019a) Cultural theory’s contributions to risk analysis: a thematic review with directions and resources for further research. Risk Analysis. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13299.
40.
JohnsonBBSwedlowBMayorgaM (2019) Cultural theory and cultural cognition theory survey measures: confirmatory factoring and predictive validity of factor scores for judged risk. Journal of Risk Research. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2019.1687577.
41.
JohnsonBBBrandtMTurner-ZwinkelsFM, et al. (2021) How alike are political values measures? Comparing measures of Universal Values, Moral Foundations, Cultural Theory, and Cultural Cognition Theory. Working Paper, Decision Research, Michigan State University, Tilburg University, and Northern Illinois University.
42.
KarlsenRAardalB (2016) Political values count but issue ownership decides? how stable and dynamic factors influence party set and vote choice in multiparty systems. International Political Science Review37(2): 261–276.
43.
KeeleLWolakJ (2006) Value conflict and volatility in party identification. British Journal of Political Science36(4): 671–690.
44.
KissSJMontpetitÉLachapelleE (2020) Beyond regions and ideology: cultural theory and risk perception in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science53(2):1–22. DOI: 10.1017/S0008423920000177.
45.
KnutsenO (1995) Value orientations, political conflicts and left-right identification: a comparative study. European Journal of Political Research28(1): 63–93.
46.
KnutsenO (2014) Methodological and substantive issues in analyses of a dependent nominal level variable in comparative research: the case of party choice. In: 23rd world congress of political science, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 19-23 July 2014.
47.
KnutsenO (2017a) Political parties and party systems. In: KnutsenO (ed) The Nordic Models in Political Science. Challenged, but Still Viable?Oslo: Fagbokforlaget, 45–76.
48.
KnutsenO (2017b) Social cleavages and political value conflicts. In: KnutsenO (ed) The Nordic Models in Political Science. Challenged, but Still Viable?Oslo: Fagbokforlaget, 77–103.
49.
KnutsenO (ed) (2017c) The Nordic Models in Political Science. Challenged, but Still Viable?Oslo: Fagbokforlaget. ISBN 978-82-450-2175-2.
50.
LipsetSMRokkanS (eds) (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspective.New York: Free Press.
51.
MalekiAde JongM (2014) A proposal for clustering the dimensions of national culture. Cross-Cultural Research48(2): 107–143.
52.
MamadouhV (1999a) National political cultures in the European Union. In: ThompsonMGrendstadGSelleP (eds). Cultural Theory as Political Science. London: Routledge, 138–153.
53.
MamadouhV (1999b) A political-cultural map of Europe. Family structures and the origins of differences between national political cultures in the European Union. GeoJournal47(3): 477–486.
54.
McGregorRMCaruanaNJStephensonLB (2015) Negative partisanship in a multi-party system: the case of Canada. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties25(3):300–316, DOI:10.1080/17457289.2014.997239.
55.
MedeirosMNoëlA (2014) The forgotten side of partisanship: negative party identification in four Anglo-American democracies. Comparative Political Studies47(7): 1022–1046. DOI: 10.1177/0010414013488560
56.
NowlinMCRabovskyTM (2019) A cultural theory of partisanship and policy attitudes. Social Science Quarterly. DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12750.
57.
OlliE (1999) Rejection of cultural biases and effects on party preference. In: ThompsonMGrendstadGSelleP (eds) Cultural Theory as Political Science. London and New York: Routledge, 57–71.
58.
OlliE (2012) Rejected Cultural Biases Shape our Political Views: A Migrant Household Study and Two Large-Scale Surveys. PhD Thesis. University of Bergen, Norway.
59.
OscarssonHGilljamMGranbergD (1997) The concept of party set - a viable approach or just another way to cut the same cheese? In: Annual meeting of the Swedish Political Science Association, Uppsala, Sweden, 5-7 October 1997.
60.
PetersenMBSlothuusRTogebyL (2010) Political parties and value consistency in public opinion formation. Public Opinion Quarterly74(3): 530–550.
61.
RidgeHM (2020) Enemy mine: negative partisanship and satisfaction with democracy. Political Behavior, DOI: 10.1007/s11109-020-09658-7
62.
RipbergerJTSongGNowlinMC, et al. (2012) Reconsidering the relationship between cultural theory, political ideology, and political knowledge. Social Science Quarterly93(3): 713–731.
63.
RipbergerJTSwedlowB (2021) Fatalists for Trump? A cultural theory of authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and presidential vote. In: 117th annual conference of the American Political Science Association, Seattle, WA, 30 September– 3 October, 2021.
64.
RobinsonR (2014) Culture and legal policy punctuations in the Supreme Court’s gender discrimination cases. Policy Studies Journal42(4): 555–589.
65.
RobinsonR (2016) Cultural change and subsystem collapse: revisiting the fall of the atomic energy commission. Public Administration. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12215.
66.
RoseRMishlerW (1998) Negative and positive party identification in post-communist countries. Electoral Studies17(2): 217–234, DOI: 10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00016-X.
67.
SotirovMSwedlowB (2021) Using cultural theory to specify sources and dynamics of core beliefs, advocacy coalitions, exploitive coalitions, and policy learning in the advocacy coalition framework: a theoretical synthesis. In: International Conference on Public Policy, Barcelona, Spain, 5–9 July 2021.
68.
SwedlowB (2008) Beyond liberal and conservative: two-dimensional conceptions of ideology and the structure of political attitudes and values. Journal of Political Ideologies13(2): 155–178.
69.
SwedlowB (2011) Introduction: cultural theory’s contributions to political science. PS: Political Science & Politics44(4): 703–710.
70.
SwedlowB (2014) Advancing policy theory with cultural theory: an introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal42(4): 465–483.
71.
SwedlowB (2017) Three cultural boundaries of science, institutions, and policy: a cultural theory of coproduction, boundary-work, and change. Review of Policy Research34(6): 827–853.
72.
SwedlowBWyckoffML (2009) Value preferences and ideological structuring of attitudes in American public opinion. American Politics Research37(6): 1048–1087.
73.
SwedlowBRipbergerJTLiuL, et al. (2016) Culture war? A theory and evidence of cultural conflict, coalition, and change in the US. In: 112th annual conference of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, 1–4 September 2016.
SwedlowBRipbergerJTLiuL, et al. (2020) Construct validity of cultural theory survey measures. Social Science Quarterly101(6): 2332–2383. DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12859.
76.
SwedlowBRipbergerJ (2021) A Cultural Theory of the Culture Wars. Working Paper. University of Oklahoma and Northern Illinois University.
77.
ThompsonMEllisRWildavskyA (1990) Cultural Theory. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
78.
VerweijMAlexandrovaPJacobsenH, et al. (2020) Four galore? The overlap between Mary Douglas’s Grid-Group typology and other highly cited social science classifications. Sociological Theory38(3): 263–294.
79.
WebsterSWAbramowitzAI (2017) The ideological foundations of affective polarization in the US electorate. American Politics Research45(4): 621–647, DOI: 10.1177/1532673X17703132.
80.
WildavskyA (1987) Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: a cultural theory of preference formation. American Political Science Review81(1): 3–21.
81.
WildavskyA (2001) In: SwedlowB (ed). Budgeting and Governing. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
82.
WildavskyA (2006) In: SwedlowB (ed). Cultural Analysis: Politics, Public Law, and Administration.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
83.
WildavskyADakeK (1990) Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why?Daedalus119(4): 41–60.
84.
XueWHineDWLoiNM, et al. (2014) Cultural worldviews and environmental risk perceptions: a meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology40: 249–258.
85.
XueWHineDWMarksADG, et al. (2016) Cultural worldviews and climate change: a view from China. Asian Journal of Social Psychology19: 134–144.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
