The remoteness of democratic representation

Abstract

Democratic representation is increasingly remote from citizens. Many institutions exacerbate this remoteness, but the shrinking ratio of legislative representatives to citizens is perhaps the most obvious. Around the world, the number of representatives has not kept pace with growing populations. To what extent does this distance, between citizens and their elected politicians, explain our current democratic malaise? Relying on both quantitative and historical evidence, this article maps the remoteness of democratic representation and considers its causes, consequences, and potential remedies. Strongly associated with economic inequality and rural elites, the remoteness of representation has far-flung implications, ranging from deficits of diversity and accountability in political representation to the weakened capacity of citizens to engage in political collective action.

Keywords

assemblies representativeness accountability inequality landed elites

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acemoglu

Johnson

Robinson

(2005) Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth. In: Aghion

Durlauf

(eds). Handbook of Economic Growth. Elsevier, 385–472. doi: 10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3.

Albertus

(2017) Landowners and democracy. World Politics 69(2): 233–276.

Annenberg Public Policy Center (2016) Americans’ knowledge of the branches of government is declining. In: The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. Available at: https://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/americans-knowledge-of-the-branches-of-government-is-declining/(accessed on 5 June 2020).

Ardanaz

Scartascini

(2013) Inequality and personal income taxation. Comparative Political Studies 46(12): 1636–1663.

Auriol

Gary-Bobo

(2012) On the optimal number of representatives. Public Choice 153(3–4): 419–445. Springer.

Beck

Katz

(1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review 89: 634–647. JSTOR.

Bell

Fairbrother

Jones

(2019) Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice. Quality & Quantity 53(2): 1051–1074. Springer.

Berman

(2019) Democracy and Dictatorship in Europe: From the Ancien Régime to the Present Day. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bhatti

Hansen

(2019) Voter turnout and municipal amalgamations-evidence from Denmark. Local Government Studies 45(5): 697–723.

10.

Blom‐Hansen

Houlberg

Serritzlew

(2021) Jurisdiction size and local government effectiveness: assessing the effects of municipal amalgamations on performance. European Journal of Political Research 60(1): 153–174.

11.

Boone

Wahman

(2015) Rural bias in African electoral systems: legacies of unequal representation in African democracies. Electoral Studies 40: 335–346. Elsevier.

12.

Brady

Witting

(2020) Germany Seeks Electoral Reform to Avoid XXL Bundestag. DW.COM, 25 August. Available at: https://www.dw.com/en/germany-seeks-electoral-reform-to-avoid-xxl-bundestag/a-54694043 (accessed on 30 December 2020).

13.

Carey

Hix

(2011) The electoral sweet spot: low‐magnitude proportional electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science 55(2): 383–397.

14.

Chen

Malhotra

(2007) The law of k/n: the effect of chamber size on government spending in bicameral legislatures. American Political Science Review 101(4): 657–676. Cambridge University Press.

15.

Cinelli

Hazlett

(2020) Making sense of sensitivity: Extending omitted variable bias. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 82(1): 39–67. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12348.

16.

Coppedge

Gerring

Knutsen

, et al. (2021) “V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v11.1”. Varieties of Democracy Project. doi: 10.23696/VDEMDS21.

17.

Cox

McCubbins

(2001) The institutional determinants of economic policy. In: Haggard

McCubbins

(eds), Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy. Cambridge, UK New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–63.

18.

Easterly

(2007) Inequality does cause underdevelopment: insights from a new instrument. Journal of Development Economics 84(2): 755–776. Elsevier.

19.

Eaton

(2014) Recentralization and the left turn in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 47(8): 1130–1157. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Sage CA.

20.

Elkins

Ginsburg

(2021) Characteristics of national constitutions. version 3.0. Available at: comparativeconstitutionsproject.org

21.

Ensley

Tofias

De Marchi

(2009) District complexity as an advantage in congressional elections. American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 990–1005. Wiley Online Library.

22.

Gallagher

(1991) Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems. Electoral Studies 10(1): 33–51. Elsevier.

23.

Gallagher

(2019) Election Indices Dataset. Retrieved from http://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/people/michael_gallagher/ElSystems/index.php

24.

Gandhi

Lust-Okar

(2009) Elections under authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 403–422.

25.

Gerring

Veenendaal

(2020) Population and Politics: The Impact of Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Gilligan

Matsusaka

(2001) Fiscal policy, legislature size, and political parties: evidence from state and local governments in the first half of the 20th century. National Tax Journal The University of Chicago Press, 54(1): 57–82. The University of Chicago Press.

27.

Hayes

Lawless

(2018) The decline of local news and its effects: new evidence from longitudinal data. The Journal of Politics 80(1): 332–336. The University of Chicago Press.

28.

Inter-Parliamentary Union (2019) Inter-parliamentary union data. Retrieved from https://data.ipu.org/content/list-fields

29.

Kedar

Harsgor

Sheinerman

(2016) Are voters equal under proportional representation? American Journal of Political Science 60(3): 676–691. Wiley Online Library.

30.

Landemore

(2013) Deliberation, cognitive diversity, and democratic inclusiveness: an epistemic argument for the random selection of representatives. Synthese 190(7): 1209–1231. Springer.

31.

Lijphart

(1994) Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990. Comparative European Politics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

32.

Lijphart

(2012) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. 2nd edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

33.

Manin

(1997) The Principles of Representative Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Margaritondo

(2021) Size of national assemblies: the classic derivation of the cube-root law is conceptually flawed. Frontiers in PhysicsFrontiers 8: 606.

35.

Marland

(2019) Fewer politicians and smaller assemblies: how party elites rationalise reducing the number of seats in a legislature - lessons from Canada. The Journal of Legislative Studies 25(2): 149–168. Taylor and Francis.

36.

Mignozzetti

Cepaluni

(2019) Legislature size and welfare: evidence from Brazil. preprint, 14 October. SocArXiv. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/8r97e.

37.

Moore

Jr (1966) Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.

38.

Nicolau

(1997) As distorções na representação dos estados na câmara dos deputados brasileira. Dados 40(3): 441–464.

39.

Ostwald

Courtin

(2020) Malapportionment in Myanmar’s elections: a slumbering menace. Contemporary Southeast Asia 42(2): 145–173. ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute.

40.

Pettersson-Lidbom

(2012) Does the size of the legislature affect the size of government? Evidence from two natural experiments. Journal of Public Economics 96(3–4): 269–278. Elsevier.

41.

Powell

(2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

42.

Revel

Lin

Halpern

(2021) The Optimal Size of an Epistemic Congress. arXiv:2107.01042 [cs]. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.01042.

43.

Santos

(1986) Sessenta E Quatro: Anatomia Da Crise. São Paulo: Vértice.

44.

Shah

(2021) What if we selected our leaders by lottery? Democracy by sortition, liberal elections and communist revolutionaries. Development and Change 52(4): 687–728.

45.

Solt

(2020) Measuring income inequality across countries and over time: the standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly 101(3): 1183–1199. Wiley Online Library.

46.

Taagepera

(1972) The size of national assemblies. Social Science Research 1(4): 385–401. Elsevier.

47.

Taagepera

Shugart

(1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.

48.

Weyland

(1998) The politics of corruption in Latin America. Journal of Democracy. Johns Hopkins University Press, 9(2): 108–121.

49.

Wooldridge

(2019) Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels. Journal of Econometrics, 211(1): 137–150. Elsevier.

50.

World Bank (2021) World Development Indicators. Washington, DC.

51.

Zucco

Power

(2021) Fragmentation without cleavages? Endogenous fractionalization in the Brazilian party system. Comparative Politics 53(3): 477–500.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.76 MB