Electoral stability has been viewed as an essential condition for the healthy functioning of representative democracy. However, there is little agreement in the literature about what shapes the stability of the electorate in general nor much attention paid to that of the Asian electorates in particular. We propose historical legacies, uniquely testable in Asia, as central determinants, but also test for conventional factors examined in other regions. By analyzing more than 150 elections in 19 post-WWII Asian democracies, we find that certain types of authoritarian (military or personalist) and colonial (non-British) legacies have a detrimental impact on the stabilization of the electorate, while some of the findings from other regions apply also to Asia. Our additional finding that such effects of historical legacies, particularly authoritarian interludes, are attenuated and cease to be significant with sufficient maturation of democracy, has important implications for the way party systems develop and democracies consolidate.
AbernethyDB (2000) The Dynamics of Global Dominance: European Overseas Empires, 1415–1980. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
AdeneyK (2017) Dataset on Electoral Volatility in India: 1952–2014. Unpublished
3.
AspinallEHickenAScambaryJ, et al. (2018) Timor-leste votes: Parties and patronage. Journal of Democracy29(1): 153–167.
4.
BartoliniSMairP (1990) Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilization of European Electorates 1885–1985. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BaumJR (2011) Responsive Democracy: Increasing State Accountability in East Asia. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
6.
BellD (2015) The China Model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BernhardM.KarakoçE. (2011) Moving west or going south? Economic transformation and institutionalization in post- communist party systems. Comparative Politics44(1): 1–20.
8.
BernhardMReenockCNordstromT (2004) The legacy of western overseas colonialism on democratic survival. International Studies Quarterly48(1): 225–250.
9.
BirchS (2003) Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Basingstoke.
10.
BirnirJK (2007) Divergence in diversity? The dissimilar effects of cleavages on electoral politics in new democracies. African Journal of Paediatric Surgery: AJPS51(3): 602–619.
11.
Casal BértoaF (2017) “Separation, divorce or harakiri? The ‘crisis’ of Asian democracies in comparative perspective. Journal of Northeast Asian History14(2): 63–94.
12.
Casal BértoaFRamaJ (2020) Party decline or social transformation? economic, institutional and sociological change and the rise of anti-political-establishment parties in Western Europe. European Political Science Review12(4): 503–523.
13.
ChengT-JHsuY-M (2015) “Long in the making: Taiwan’s institutionalized party system. In: AllenHKuhontaEM (ed) Party System Institutionalization in Asia: Democracies, Autocracies and the Shadows of the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CohenMJSalles KobilanskiFEZechmeisterEJ (2018) Electoral volatility in latin America. The Journal of Politics80(3): 1017–1022.
15.
ConversePE (1969) Of time and partisan stability. Comparative Political Studies2(2): 139–171.
16.
CroissantAVölkelP (2012) Party system types and party system institutionalization: Comparing new democracies in East and Southeast Asia. Party Politics18(2): 235–265.
17.
CunninghamS (2021) Causal Inference. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
DassonnevilleRHoogheM (2017) Economic indicators and electoral volatility: Economic effects on electoral volatility in Western Europe, 1950–2013. Comparative European Politics15(6): 919–943.
19.
DicksonB (2016) The Dictator’s Dilemma: The Chinese Communist Party’s Strategy for Survival. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20.
DixR (1992) Democratization and the institutionalization of latin American political parties. Comparative Political Studies24(1): 488–496.
21.
DoolotkeldievaAWoltersA (2017) Uncertainty perpetuated? The pitfalls of a weakly institutionalized party system in Kyrgyzstan. Central Asian Affairs4(1): 26–50.
22.
EnyediZCasal BértoaF (2018) Institutionalization and de-institutionalization in post-communist party systems. East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures32(3): 422–450.
23.
EnyediZCasal BértoaF (2020) Party Systems: Types, Dimensions and Explanations.In: ZugriffBU (ed) Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
24.
EpperlyB (2011) Institutions and legacies: electoral volatility in the postcommunist world. Comparative Political Studies44(7): 829–853.
25.
FaulknerW (1951) Requiem for a Nun. New York, NY: Vintage.
26.
FerreeKE (2010) The social origins of electoral volatility in Africa. British Journal of Political Science40(4): 759–779.
27.
FritzV (2008) Mongolia: The rise and travails of a deviant democracy. Democratization15(4): 766–788.
28.
GeddesBWrightJFrantzE (2014) Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new data set. Perspectives on Politics12(2): 313–331.
29.
GinsburgTHugA (2019) How to Save A Constitutional Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
HadeniusA (1992) Democracy and Development. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
31.
HickenAKuhontaEM (eds) (2015) Introduction: Rethinking party system institutionalization in Asia. In: Party System Institutionalization in Asia: Democracies, Autocracies and the Shadows of the Past. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32.
HickenAKuhontaEM (2015) Party and party system institutionalization in the Philippines. In: HickenA (ed). Party System Institutionalization in Asia: Democracies, Autocracies and the Shadows of the Past. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
33.
HuntingtonSP (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
KitscheltHMansfeldováZMarkowskiR, et al. (1999) Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35.
KitscheltH (1995) Formation of party cleavages in post-communist democracies. Party Politics1(4): 447–472.
36.
KuenziMTumanJPRissmannMPGM, et al (2019) The economic determinants of electoral volatility in Africa. Party Politics25(4): 621–631.
37.
LaaksoMTaageperaR (1979) ‘Effective’ number of parties. A measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies12(1): 3–27.
38.
LangeMK (2004) British colonial legacies and political development. World Development32(6): 905–922.
39.
LeeDSSchulerP (2020) Testing the “China model” of meritocratic promotions: Do democracies reward less competent ministers than autocracies?Comparative Political Studies53(3–4): 531–566.
40.
LeeASchultzKA (2012) Comparing british and french colonial legacies: A discontinuity analysis of cameroon. Quarterly Journal of Political Science7(4): 365–410.
41.
LeeDS (2018a) Executive capacity to control legislatures and presidential choice of cabinet ministers in East Asian democracies. Governance31(4): 777–795.
42.
LeeDS (2018b) Portfolio allocation as the president’s calculations: Loyalty, copartisanship, and political context in South Korea. Journal of East Asian Studies18(3): 345–365.
43.
LeeDS (2020) Executive control of bureaucracy and presidential cabinet appointments in East Asian democracies. Regulation & Governance14(1): 82–101.
44.
LijphartA (2012) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. 2nd edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
45.
LinzJJStepanA (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
46.
MadridR (2005) Ethnic cleavages and electoral volatility in Latin America. Comparative Politics38: 1–20.
47.
MainwaringSTorcalM. 2006. Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization. In: KatzRSCrottyJW (ed) Handbook of Party Politics. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
48.
MainwaringSZocoE (2007) Political sequences and the stabilization of interparty competition. Party Politics13(2): 155–178.
49.
MainwaringSGervasoniCEspaña-NajeraA (2017) Extra- and within-system electoral volatility. Party Politics23(6): 623–635.
50.
MainwaringS (2018) Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay and Collapse. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
51.
MainwaringSScullyT (1995) Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America. Stanford Univ Press
MarxK (1852) The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York, NY: Mondial.
54.
Meyer-SahlingJ-H (2009) Varieties of legacies: a critical review of legacy explanations of public administration reform in East Central Europe. International Review of Administrative Sciences75(3): 509–528.
55.
MorlinoL (1998) Democracy Between Consolidation and Crisis: Parties, Groups, and Citizens in Southern Europe. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
56.
NohlenDGrotzFHartmannC (2001a) Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook: Volume I: Middle East, Central Asia, and South Asia. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
57.
NohlenDGrotzFHartmannC (2001b) Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook: Volume II: South East Asia, East Asia, and the South Pacific. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
58.
O’DwyerC (2006) Runaway State-Building: Patronage Politics and Democratic Development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
59.
PedersenMN (1979) The dynamics of European party systems: Changing patterns of electoral volatility. European Journal of Political Research7(1): 1–26.
60.
Pop-ElechesG (2007) Historical legacies and post-communist regime change. The Journal of Politics69(4): 908–926.
61.
PowellENTuckerJA (2014) Revisiting electoral volatility in post-communist countries: New data, new results and new approaches. British Journal of Political Science44(1): 123–147.
62.
PridhamG (2000) Confining conditions and breaking with the past: Historical legacies and political learning in transitions to democracy. Democratization7(2): 36–64.
63.
ReuterOJRobertsonGB (2012) Subnational appointments in authoritarian regimes: Evidence from Russian gubernatorial appointments. The Journal of Politics74(4): 1023–1037.
64.
RiedlRB (2014) Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Party Systems in Africa. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
65.
RiggerS (1999) Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Democracy. London: Routledge.
66.
RobbinsJWHunterLY (2012) Impact of electoral volatility and party replacement on voter turnout levels. Party Politics18(6): 9190939.
67.
RobbinsJW (2010) Party system institutionalization and government spending. Comparative Politics42(2): 229–248.
68.
RobertsKMWibbelsE (1999) Party systems and electoral volatility in latin America: A test of economic, institutional, and structural explanations. American Political Science Review93(3): 575–590.
69.
SavageL (2016) Party system institutionalization and government formation in new democracies. World Politics68(3): 499–537.
70.
ShugartMS (2006) Comparative executive-legislative relations. In: RhodesRAWBinderSARockmanBA (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
71.
SikkA (2005) How unstable? Volatility and the genuinely new parties in Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research44: 391–412.
72.
TanP (2006) Indonesia seven years after soeharto: Party system institutionalization in a new democracy. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs28(1): 88–114.
73.
TavitsM (2005) The development of stable party support: Electoral dynamics in post-communist Europe. African Journal of Paediatric Surgery: AJPS49(2): 283–298.
74.
ThayerCA (2010) Political legitimacy in Vietnam: Challenge and response. Politics & Policy38(3): 423–444.
75.
TommasiM (2006) The institutional foundations of public policy. Economía6(2): 1–36.
76.
UfenA (2008) Political party and party system institutionalization in Southeast Asia: Lessons for democratic consolidation in Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand. The Pacific Review21(3): 327–350.
77.
WeghorstKRBernhardM (2014) From formlessness to structure? The institutionalization of competitive party systems in Africa. Comparative Political Studies47(12): 1707–1737.
78.
WhitingS (2004) The cadre evaluation system at the grass roots: The paradox of party rule. In: NaughtonBJYangDL (eds), Holding China Together: Diversity and National Integration in the Post-Deng Era. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
79.
ZaryckiTNowakA (2000) Hidden dimensions: The stability and structure of regional political cleavages in Poland. Communist and Post-Communist Studies33(3): 331–354.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
